What is the primary objective of **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The primary objective of CSL is to establish a nationwide statutory framework for securing information systems, enforcing network security, data localization, and cybersecurity governance for all entities processing data in China.** Enacted on **June 1, 2017**, with 69 articles, it mandates technical safeguards like firewalls and real-time monitoring, requires **Critical Information Infrastructure (CII)** and **important data** storage in Mainland China, and imposes senior executive accountability under its three pillars.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**CSL applies to all network operators, CII operators, data processors of important data, and foreign enterprises serving Chinese users.** This includes **network operators** like cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud), **CII operators** in power grids or banking, processors of large-scale personal data (e.g., e-commerce like JD.com), and foreign services (e.g., Microsoft 365) with Chinese digital footprints.

Does **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, CSL requires government-approved security evaluations and certifications, such as the Security Protection Capability Test (SPCT) for CII operators submitted to MIIT, and China Information Security Certification (CISC) where applicable.** **Article 20** mandates penetration testing and vulnerability scanning; CII entities must use certified testing agencies for attestation.

How often should an assessment for **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be performed?

**CSL assessments must be conducted periodically, with security testing required ongoing and full re-assessments triggered within 60 days of regulatory amendments.** Real-time monitoring via SIEM is mandatory, alongside annual compliance reports, quarterly training, and incident-response drills to meet **Article 21** and **Article 31** reporting within 24 hours.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**Non-compliance with CSL incurs fines up to 5% of annual revenue per the 2022 amendment, business license suspension, service shutdowns, and operational disruptions.** Examples include a CNY 150 million fine for data non-localization in 2020 and API blocks for cloud providers; reputational damage and PIPL lawsuits add further exposure.

Can **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CSL can be mapped to international frameworks by aligning its controls, such as Annex A of ISO 27001, to CSL articles like network security (Article 21).** Implementation frameworks recommend such mappings for audit readiness, integrating data localization with global standards while embedding CSL-specific requirements like SM cryptography.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The first step for CSL implementation is Phase 0: securing executive sponsorship and conducting regulatory baseline mapping.** Establish a C-suite charter, cross-functional steering committee, and catalog of applicable CSL articles cross-referenced to related laws, preventing scope creep and aligning resources.

What is the primary objective of **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 requires regulated entities to maintain an information security capability commensurate with vulnerabilities and threats to information assets.** This minimises the likelihood and impact of incidents on confidentiality, integrity, or availability (**CIA**) of information assets, including those managed by related parties or third parties (paragraphs 1, 15-16). Effective from 1 July 2019, it ensures continued sound operation of the entity.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **APRA CPS 234**?

**APRA CPS 234 applies to all APRA-regulated entities, including authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs), general insurers, life companies, private health insurers, and RSE licensees.** It covers Heads of groups on a group-wide basis, extending to non-regulated group entities (paragraphs 2-4). Foreign ADIs, Category C insurers, and eligible foreign life insurance companies comply only for Australian branch operations (paragraph 3).

Does **APRA CPS 234** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**APRA CPS 234 does not mandate external audit or third-party certification.** It requires internal audit to review design and operating effectiveness of information security controls, including those of related parties and third parties, using appropriately skilled personnel (paragraphs 32-34). Entities may rely on third-party assurance if internal audit assesses its sufficiency for material-impact assets (paragraph 34).

How often should an assessment for **APRA CPS 234** be performed?

**APRA CPS 234 requires the testing program to be reviewed at least annually or upon material change to information assets or the business environment.** Systematic testing of control effectiveness must occur with frequency commensurate with vulnerability/threat change rates, asset criticality/sensitivity, incident consequences, and exposure to untrusted environments (paragraphs 27, 31). Internal audit provides ongoing assurance (paragraph 32).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **APRA CPS 234**?

**Non-compliance with APRA CPS 234 exposes entities to APRA's prudential enforcement powers under relevant Acts.** These include directions for remediation, heightened supervision, or other actions (paragraph 11). Entities must notify APRA within **72 hours** of material incidents or **10 business days** of unremediable material control weaknesses (paragraphs 35-36), triggering potential regulatory intervention.

Can **APRA CPS 234** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, APRA CPS 234's outcomes-based requirements can be mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework.** Its focus on governance, commensurate controls, systematic testing, and third-party oversight aligns with ISO 27001's ISMS and NIST's Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover functions, enabling operationalisation while meeting Board accountability and notification timelines (paragraphs 13, 27-36).

What is the first step to begin implementing **APRA CPS 234**?

**The first step is for the Board to assume ultimate responsibility and approve an information security governance framework (paragraph 13).** This includes defining roles/responsibilities (paragraph 14), identifying/classifying information assets by criticality and sensitivity (paragraph 20), and establishing a policy framework commensurate with threats (paragraphs 18-19).

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs APRA CPS 234

Standards Comparison

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Mandatory

N/A

China's regulation for network security and data localization

APRA CPS 234

Mandatory

2019

Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

Quick Verdict

CSL mandates data localization and network security for China operations, while APRA CPS 234 requires board-accountable cyber resilience for Australian finance. Companies adopt CSL for China market access, CPS 234 for regulatory compliance and operational resilience.

Standard

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandates data localization for CII and important data
Requires real-time network security monitoring and testing
Assigns cybersecurity responsibilities to senior executives
Enforces 24-hour incident reporting to authorities
Imposes fines up to 5% of annual revenue

Information Security

APRA CPS 234

Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board ultimate responsibility for information security
72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
Third-party managed assets fully in scope
Systematic risk-based testing and assurance
Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

What It Is

Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL), enacted June 1, 2017, is a nationwide statutory regulation comprising 69 articles. It governs network operators, Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) operators, and data processors in China. Primary purpose: secure information systems, protect data, and ensure national cybersecurity. Approach: baseline requirements across network security, data protection, and governance.

Key Components

Three pillars: Network Security (safeguards, testing), Data Localization & PIP (local storage, assessments), Cybersecurity Governance (executive duties, reporting).
Applies to broad entities like cloud platforms, apps.
Core principles: mandatory compliance, incident cooperation.
Compliance via assessments, no formal certification but audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal obligation with fines to 5% revenue; mitigates disruptions, lawsuits. Builds consumer/enterprise trust, enables efficiency via modern architectures. Strategic edge in China's market through innovation, regulatory alignment.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, architectural redesign (local data centers, SIEM), governance, testing. For organizations with Chinese users/operations, all sizes. Requires MIIT evaluations for CII; ongoing monitoring.

APRA CPS 234 Details

What It Is

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds) to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance, controls, testing, and notification.

Key Components

**11 core requirementsBoard accountability, role definitions, capability maintenance, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit, APRA notifications (72 hours for incidents, 10 days for weaknesses).
Built on CIA triad principles; no fixed control count, but commensurate with risk.
Compliance via evidence-based assurance, no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, enforcement.
Enhances cyber resilience, third-party oversight, stakeholder trust.
Reduces operational risks, supports sound operations.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, governance/policies, asset classification, controls/testing, incident plans.
Applies to all sizes in APRA sectors (Australia); internal audit/testing required. (178 words)