What is the primary objective of **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The primary objective of CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) is to establish a nationwide statutory framework governing network security, data localization, and cybersecurity governance for all entities processing data in Chinese jurisdiction.** Enacted on **June 1, 2017**, with 69 articles, it mandates technical safeguards like firewalls and SOC monitoring (**network security**), storage of **Critical Information Infrastructure (CII)** and **important data** in Mainland China with security assessments for cross-border transfers (**data localization & PIP**), and senior executive accountability with incident reporting (**cybersecurity governance**).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**All network operators, CII operators, data processors holding important data, and foreign enterprises serving Chinese users must comply with CSL (Cyber Security Law of China).** This includes entities owning networks for public services (e.g., **Tencent Cloud**, **Alibaba Cloud**), operating systems critical to national security or public welfare (e.g., power grids, banking cores), processing large-scale personal or **important data** per State Council lists (e.g., e-commerce platforms like JD.com), and foreign services like **Microsoft 365** or **Zoom** touching Chinese users.

Does **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) requires external security assessments and government-approved evaluations, including third-party certification for CII operators.** **Article 20** mandates penetration testing and vulnerability scanning; CII operators must submit **Security Protection Capability Test (SPCT)** reports to **MIIT** via certified agencies, with options like **China Information Security Certification (CISC)** for audit readiness.

How often should an assessment for **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be performed?

**CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) assessments must be conducted periodically, with security testing per Article 20, annual compliance reporting, and re-assessments within 60 days of regulatory amendments.** Ongoing monitoring via **SIEM** and **KPI dashboards** (e.g., % data localized) ensures continuous compliance, alongside quarterly training and incident drills within the **24-hour reporting window** of **Article 31**.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**Non-compliance with CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) results in fines up to 5% of annual revenue, business license suspension, service shutdowns, and operational disruptions.** Per 2022 amendments, examples include CNY 150 million fines for data non-localization (2020 streaming platform) and API blocks for cloud providers; additional risks encompass reputational damage, lawsuits under PIPL, and key seizures.

Can **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) can be mapped to international frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST for aligned controls.** Implementation frameworks reference **ISO 27001 Annex A** for policy suites and audits, **NIST** for risk models, enabling hybrid strategies like **Zero-Trust Architecture** while embedding CSL-specific mandates such as **SM algorithms** and data localization.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The first step to implement CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) is Phase 0: secure executive sponsorship and conduct regulatory baseline mapping.** Establish a C-suite charter, cross-functional steering committee, and catalog applicable **CSL articles** (e.g., **Article 21** network security, **Article 30** reporting) cross-referenced to PIPL/DSL, preventing scope creep.

What is the primary objective of **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The primary objective of MLPS 2.0 is to establish a graded cybersecurity protection system for all network operators in China, ensuring security controls match the potential harm from system compromise to national security, social order, public interests, and citizens' rights.** Operationalized under Article 21 of the 2017 Cybersecurity Law, it requires classification into five levels (1-5) based on impact severity, with controls defined in GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), and GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**All 'network operators' in mainland China must comply with MLPS 2.0, broadly defined to include any entity operating networks or information systems.** This encompasses domestic enterprises, foreign multinationals with China operations, cloud providers, IoT platforms, and critical infrastructure in sectors like finance and energy. Virtually no size threshold exists; even small systems qualify if networked.

Does **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 requires external expert review and third-party evaluation for systems at Level 2 and above, conducted by licensed Chinese firms per GB/T 28448-2019.** Evaluations score compliance (typically ≥75/100) across technical and management controls; PSBs approve filings. Level 1 needs only self-assessment; higher levels demand periodic certified audits.

How often should an assessment for **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be performed?

**Assessments under MLPS 2.0 must be performed biennially for Level 2 systems, annually for Level 3, semi-annually for Level 4, and as mandated for Level 5, plus upon major changes.** Self-inspections are ongoing; third-party evaluations and PSB verifications align with these cycles to ensure continuous compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**Non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 results in administrative fines (e.g., RMB 50,000–223 million in cases), operational suspensions, blacklisting, and intensified PSB inspections.** Enforcement since 2017 includes over 6,400 investigations; severe cases lead to network shutdowns, license revocations, and personal liability for managers.

Can **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 controls can be mapped to frameworks like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF, leveraging shared domains such as governance, access management, and monitoring.** However, MLPS adds China-specific elements like data localization, PSB filings, and graded impact-based classification, requiring targeted gap closure.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The first step in implementing MLPS 2.0 is to conduct a comprehensive inventory of grading objects (networks, systems, applications) and perform preliminary self-classification into Levels 1-5 using GB/T 22239-2019 impact matrices.** Document boundaries, assets, and harm scenarios, then file with local PSBs within 30 days for Level 2+ systems.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Standards Comparison

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Mandatory

N/A

China's regulation for network security and data localization

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory

N/A

China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection scheme

Quick Verdict

CSL mandates broad cybersecurity for all Chinese network operators, emphasizing data localization and governance. MLPS 2.0 operationalizes CSL via graded protection levels with technical controls. Companies adopt them for legal compliance and market access in China.

Standard

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandates data localization for CII and important data in China
Requires real-time network monitoring and security testing
Imposes cybersecurity responsibilities on senior executives
Enforces 24-hour incident reporting to authorities
Binds foreign entities serving Chinese users extraterritorially

Standard

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Five graded protection levels based on impact
Mandatory classification and PSB registration
Technical controls for cloud, IoT, big data
Separation of duties and personnel vetting
Annual third-party evaluations for Level 3+

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

What It Is

The Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China (CSL), enacted on June 1, 2017, is a nationwide regulation comprising 69 articles. It governs network operators, data processors, and entities handling Chinese user data, emphasizing risk-based safeguards for network security, data protection, and governance.

Key Components

**Three pillarsNetwork Security (safeguards, monitoring), Data Localization & PIP (local storage for CII/important data), Cybersecurity Governance (executive duties, reporting).
Applies to CII operators, important data handlers, foreign services.
Core requirements: 24-hour incident reporting, SM cryptography, zero-trust architectures.
Compliance via assessments, no central certification but MIIT evaluations.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for compliance to avoid fines up to 5% of revenue, shutdowns, reputational harm. Drives trust, efficiency through modern tech (SOAR, edge computing), innovation via local R&D. Enhances market access, stakeholder confidence in regulated sectors like finance, healthcare.

Implementation Overview

Phased: alignment, gap analysis, redesign (localization, SIEM, IAM), governance/training, testing/audits. Targets network operators, MNCs with Chinese users; demands high resources, suits mid-to-large firms across industries.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

What It Is

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's mandatory cybersecurity regulation operationalizing Article 21 of the 2017 Cybersecurity Law. It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, public order, and rights, implementing graded technical and management controls.

Key Components

Domains: physical security, network/host protection, data security, security management.
Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (basics), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
Built on impact-based grading; compliance via self-assessment, expert review (Level 2+), PSB filing.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal obligation enforced by PSBs with fines, inspections.
Rationalizes investments, strengthens posture, integrates with ISO 27001/NIST.
Builds trust, avoids sanctions, enables market access in China.

Implementation Overview

Phased: inventory/grading, gap analysis, remediation, third-party evaluation, ongoing monitoring.
Applies to all China network operators; higher levels need annual audits.

Key Differences

Aspect	CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)	MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Scope	Network security, data localization, governance	Graded protection for all networks/systems
Industry	All network operators in China	All network operators, graded by impact
Nature	Mandatory nationwide law	Mandatory graded scheme under CSL
Testing	Security assessments, incident reporting	Level-based third-party evaluations
Penalties	Fines up to 5% revenue	Fines, inspections, operational suspension