DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
AS9110C
Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft maintenance organizations.
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms against cyber threats, while AS9110C certifies quality management for global aviation MROs ensuring airworthiness. Financial entities adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; aerospace providers pursue AS9110C for market access and safety.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (Digital Operational Resilience Act)
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aircraft Maintenance
Key Features
- Configuration management and traceability controls
- Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
- Risk-based thinking in operations
- Human factors and product safety focus
- Regulatory alignment with FAA/EASA Part-145
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulatory framework bolstering ICT resilience for financial entities against disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party risks. It uses a risk-based, proportional approach, covering 20 entity types and critical ICT providers (CTPPs), effective January 17, 2025.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks with identification, mitigation, and annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates for major incidents.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests; triennial TLPT for critical functions.
- **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, contracts, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Built on harmonization; mandates compliance without formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Legally required to avoid 2% turnover fines; reduces systemic risks from threats like ransomware (74% affected). Enhances resilience, stakeholder trust, and cross-border operations amid rising incidents like CrowdStrike outage.
Implementation Overview
Gap analyses, framework setup, testing programs, vendor mapping. Applies EU-wide to ~22,000 entities; proportional by size. Authority oversight via RTS/ITS; preparation since 2023.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based thinking (RBT) and PDCA approach focused on safety, airworthiness, and traceability.
Key Components
- Core clauses (4-10) covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Maintenance-specific domains: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, release controls.
- Built on Annex SL HLS; requires documented information, competence, and internal audits.
- Certification via accredited registrars with Stage 1/2 audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part-145).
- Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework/AOG events.
- Enhances market access, operational efficiency (5-12% cost savings), supplier confidence.
- Builds stakeholder trust through proven QMS maturity.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, pilot, rollout, audits.
- 6-12 months typical; suits MROs globally.
- Involves training, eQMS, internal audits pre-certification. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital operational resilience in finance | Quality management for aviation MRO |
| Industry | EU financial entities and ICT providers | Global aerospace maintenance organizations |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover fines | Loss of certification, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and AS9110C
DORA FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)
Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PDPA vs ISO 20000
Compare PDPA (Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan) vs ISO 20000: Decode key differences in data privacy laws & service management standards. Align compliance for secure, efficient ops now!
RoHS vs ISO 30301
Compare RoHS vs ISO 30301: Master hazardous substances limits in EEE & records management systems for compliance. Reduce risks, boost efficiency—explore now!
PDPA vs J-SOX
PDPA vs J-SOX: Compare Singapore's data privacy law with Japan's financial controls. Uncover key differences, compliance roadmaps & strategies to master both frameworks now! (148 characters)