DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
AS9110C
Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft maintenance organizations.
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms against cyber threats, while AS9110C certifies quality management for global aviation MROs ensuring airworthiness. Financial entities adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; aerospace providers pursue AS9110C for market access and safety.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (Digital Operational Resilience Act)
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aircraft Maintenance
Key Features
- Configuration management and traceability controls
- Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
- Risk-based thinking in operations
- Human factors and product safety focus
- Regulatory alignment with FAA/EASA Part-145
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulatory framework bolstering ICT resilience for financial entities against disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party risks. It uses a risk-based, proportional approach, covering 20 entity types and critical ICT providers (CTPPs), effective January 17, 2025.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks with identification, mitigation, and annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates for major incidents.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests; triennial TLPT for critical functions.
- **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, contracts, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Built on harmonization; mandates compliance without formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Legally required to avoid 2% turnover fines; reduces systemic risks from threats like ransomware (74% affected). Enhances resilience, stakeholder trust, and cross-border operations amid rising incidents like CrowdStrike outage.
Implementation Overview
Gap analyses, framework setup, testing programs, vendor mapping. Applies EU-wide to ~22,000 entities; proportional by size. Authority oversight via RTS/ITS; preparation since 2023.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based thinking (RBT) and PDCA approach focused on safety, airworthiness, and traceability.
Key Components
- Core clauses (4-10) covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Maintenance-specific domains: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, release controls.
- Built on Annex SL HLS; requires documented information, competence, and internal audits.
- Certification via accredited registrars with Stage 1/2 audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part-145).
- Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework/AOG events.
- Enhances market access, operational efficiency (5-12% cost savings), supplier confidence.
- Builds stakeholder trust through proven QMS maturity.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, pilot, rollout, audits.
- 6-12 months typical; suits MROs globally.
- Involves training, eQMS, internal audits pre-certification. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital operational resilience in finance | Quality management for aviation MRO |
| Industry | EU financial entities and ICT providers | Global aerospace maintenance organizations |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover fines | Loss of certification, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and AS9110C
DORA FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMC vs SQF
CMMC vs SQF: DoD cybersecurity (NIST 800-171 Levels 1-3) vs GFSI food safety (HACCP/GMP Modules). Compare audits, costs, pitfalls & strategies for defense/food compliance now.
AS9110C vs Basel III
Discover AS9110C vs Basel III: Aerospace QMS standards vs banking reforms. Key compliance diffs, risk mgmt, & strategies revealed. Optimize now!
FISMA vs EMAS
FISMA vs EMAS: Compare US federal cybersecurity law & EU environmental scheme. Uncover frameworks, compliance strategies & benefits for resilient ops. Boost expertise now!