Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global framework for sustainable building certification

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities against cyber threats, while BREEAM certifies sustainable building performance voluntarily worldwide. Financial firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; developers pursue BREEAM for market value, ESG credibility, and operational savings.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Requires comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks with annual reviews
    • Mandates 4-hour initial reporting for major ICT incidents
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
    • Implements direct oversight of critical third-party providers
    • Harmonizes rules across 22,000 EU-regulated financial entities
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Third-party audited certification by BRE
    • Credit-weighted scoring across 10 categories
    • Lifecycle coverage: new, refurb, in-use, infrastructure
    • Knowledge Base for continuous compliance updates
    • Alignment with net-zero and EU Taxonomy

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation bolstering digital resilience in the financial sector against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. It applies from January 17, 2025, to 20 financial entity types and critical ICT providers, using a risk-based, proactive approach for harmonized oversight.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentify, assess, mitigate risks with management oversight and proportionality.
    • **Incident ReportingLog, classify, report major incidents within 4 hours initially, 72 hours intermediate, 1-month root cause.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical functions.
    • **Third-Party Risk OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Built on four pillars; compliance via penalties up to 2% turnover, no formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU financial firms (~22,000 entities) to avoid fines, mitigate systemic cyber risks (74% ransomware hit), enhance resilience post-outages like CrowdStrike. Builds trust, streamlines cross-border compliance, drives cybersecurity investments (€10-15B EU-wide).

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses per RTS/ITS, develop frameworks/tools, train staff, test resilience. Tailored by size/complexity; ongoing for all EU financial entities/third-parties. Authorities enforce via audits, reporting by 2025 deadline.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it assesses environmental, social, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities. Its credit-based methodology organizes requirements into categories, weighted by impact, yielding ratings from Pass to Outstanding.

    Key Components

    • Core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation (10 main).
    • Credits earned via evidenced compliance; weighted scores determine ratings (e.g., Excellent ≥70%).
    • Built on technical manuals, KBCNs for updates, and third-party assurance.
    • **Certification modelLicensed assessors submit evidence; BRE audits and certifies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction), asset value uplift (up to 30%), ESG alignment.
    • Mitigates regulatory, financial, reputational risks; supports EU Taxonomy.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via independent verification; enhances market differentiation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, certification, In-Use monitoring.
    • Early assessor/AP appointment key; applies globally to all sizes/sectors.
    • Requires training, evidence management; BRE certification valid 3 years for In-Use. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    BREEAM
    Sustainability performance of built environment

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial sector and ICT providers
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure worldwide

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement
    BREEAM
    Voluntary third-party certification framework

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT by authorities
    BREEAM
    Assessor-led audits, BRE quality assurance

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    BREEAM
    No legal penalties, loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and BREEAM

    DORA FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages