DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
BREEAM
Global framework for sustainable building certification
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities against cyber threats, while BREEAM certifies sustainable building performance voluntarily worldwide. Financial firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; developers pursue BREEAM for market value, ESG credibility, and operational savings.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Requires comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks with annual reviews
- Mandates 4-hour initial reporting for major ICT incidents
- Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
- Implements direct oversight of critical third-party providers
- Harmonizes rules across 22,000 EU-regulated financial entities
BREEAM
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method
Key Features
- Third-party audited certification by BRE
- Credit-weighted scoring across 10 categories
- Lifecycle coverage: new, refurb, in-use, infrastructure
- Knowledge Base for continuous compliance updates
- Alignment with net-zero and EU Taxonomy
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation bolstering digital resilience in the financial sector against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. It applies from January 17, 2025, to 20 financial entity types and critical ICT providers, using a risk-based, proactive approach for harmonized oversight.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentify, assess, mitigate risks with management oversight and proportionality.
- **Incident ReportingLog, classify, report major incidents within 4 hours initially, 72 hours intermediate, 1-month root cause.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical functions.
- **Third-Party Risk OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Built on four pillars; compliance via penalties up to 2% turnover, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU financial firms (~22,000 entities) to avoid fines, mitigate systemic cyber risks (74% ransomware hit), enhance resilience post-outages like CrowdStrike. Builds trust, streamlines cross-border compliance, drives cybersecurity investments (€10-15B EU-wide).
Implementation Overview
Conduct gap analyses per RTS/ITS, develop frameworks/tools, train staff, test resilience. Tailored by size/complexity; ongoing for all EU financial entities/third-parties. Authorities enforce via audits, reporting by 2025 deadline.
BREEAM Details
What It Is
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it assesses environmental, social, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities. Its credit-based methodology organizes requirements into categories, weighted by impact, yielding ratings from Pass to Outstanding.
Key Components
- Core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation (10 main).
- Credits earned via evidenced compliance; weighted scores determine ratings (e.g., Excellent ≥70%).
- Built on technical manuals, KBCNs for updates, and third-party assurance.
- **Certification modelLicensed assessors submit evidence; BRE audits and certifies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction), asset value uplift (up to 30%), ESG alignment.
- Mitigates regulatory, financial, reputational risks; supports EU Taxonomy.
- Builds stakeholder trust via independent verification; enhances market differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, certification, In-Use monitoring.
- Early assessor/AP appointment key; applies globally to all sizes/sectors.
- Requires training, evidence management; BRE certification valid 3 years for In-Use. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | BREEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital operational resilience in finance | Sustainability performance of built environment |
| Industry | EU financial sector and ICT providers | Construction, real estate, infrastructure worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement | Voluntary third-party certification framework |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT by authorities | Assessor-led audits, BRE quality assurance |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover fines | No legal penalties, loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and BREEAM
DORA FAQ
BREEAM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
J-SOX vs AS9120B
Compare J-SOX vs AS9120B: Master key differences in financial controls and aerospace quality standards. Unlock compliance strategies, risks, and implementation tips for success. Dive in now!
EMAS vs GRI
Discover EMAS vs GRI: EU's verified eco-management scheme meets global impact reporting standards. Compare compliance, benefits & strategies for ESG excellence today.
EMAS vs NERC CIP
EMAS vs NERC CIP: EU voluntary eco-management scheme vs US grid cyber-reliability standards. Key diffs, compliance tips & strategies for leaders. Compare now!