Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for financial sector digital operational resilience

    VS

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's regulation for network security and data localization

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance firms via testing and oversight, while CSL enforces data localization and network security for China operators. Companies adopt DORA for regulatory compliance and systemic risk reduction; CSL for market access and avoiding severe fines.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks proportionally
    • Requires 4-hour initial major incident reporting
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
    • Oversees critical third-party ICT providers by ESAs
    • Harmonizes resilience standards across 27 EU states
    Standard

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory data localization for CII and important data
    • Real-time network security monitoring and testing
    • Senior executive cybersecurity protection responsibilities
    • Incident reporting within 24 hours to authorities
    • Security assessments for cross-border data transfers

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    DORA, formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation mandating digital operational resilience for the financial sector against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. Applicable from January 17, 2025, it covers 20 financial entity types and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), using a risk-based, proportional approach to harmonize rules across 27 member states.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, annual reviews overseen by management.
    • **Incident ReportingClassification, 4-hour initial/72-hour updates/1-month root-cause for major incidents.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
    • **Third-Party Risk OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Compliance via RTS/ITS, self-assessment, authority reporting; no central certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legally required to avoid up to 2% global turnover fines. Bolsters resilience amid 74% ransomware hits, ensures continuity (RTO <4 hours), fosters info sharing. Builds trust, drives cybersecurity investments (€10-15B EU-wide).

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses, develop frameworks/policies, perform tests/vendor reviews. Tailored by size/complexity for ~22,000 EU entities; integrates legacy systems. Ongoing monitoring, ESAs oversight from 2025.

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

    What It Is

    The Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL), enacted June 1, 2017, is a national regulation governing network operators and data processors in China. Comprising 69 articles, it mandates security for information systems with a control-based approach emphasizing technical safeguards, data protection, and governance.

    Key Components

    • **Three PillarsNetwork Security (monitoring, testing), Data Localization & PIP (local storage for CII/important data), Cybersecurity Governance (executive responsibilities, incident reporting).
    • Focuses on risk-classified protections for Critical Information Infrastructure (CII).
    • Compliance via self-assessments, government evaluations, and audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for entities serving Chinese users to avoid fines up to 5% of revenue, disruptions. Builds trust, enhances efficiency through modern architectures, enables innovation via local R&D and regulatory sandboxes. Strengthens risk management and market competitiveness.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: alignment, gap analysis, redesign (data centers, Zero-Trust), governance, testing. Targets network operators, CII, MNCs. Requires continuous monitoring, adaptation to PIPL/DSL. (178 words)

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    DORA FAQ

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages