DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities against cyber threats, while ISO 13485 provides voluntary QMS certification for medical device makers ensuring safety and regulatory compliance. Firms adopt DORA for legal compliance, ISO 13485 for market access and quality assurance.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks overseen by management body
- Enforces 4-hour initial reporting for major ICT incidents
- Requires triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical functions
- Establishes direct ESAs oversight of critical ICT third-party providers
- Harmonizes digital resilience standards across 27 EU member states
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based controls for QMS processes
- Design and development controls with validation
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Supplier evaluation and purchasing controls
- Traceability via medical device files
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulatory framework enhancing digital operational resilience against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. It applies to 20 financial entity types and critical ICT providers (~22,000 entities), using a risk-based, proportional methodology integrated with business strategies.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks for risk identification, mitigation, and annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour notifications, 72-hour updates for major incidents (>5% impact or €100k+ losses).
- **Resilience TestingAnnual vulnerability scans; triennial TLPT for critical operations.
- **Third-Party OversightContractual controls, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Compliance via RTS/ITS standards, reporting, no certification but mandatory audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for EU finance to avert 2% turnover fines, amid 74% ransomware exposure. Builds resilience, harmonizes rules, boosts trust, spurs €10-15B cybersecurity investments.
Implementation Overview
Gap analysis, framework/policy development, testing/vendor programs. Targets EU financial sector; proportionality for SMEs. Full application January 17, 2025; ongoing ESAs oversight.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It provides a certifiable framework for risk-based QMS tailored to medical devices across their lifecycle, from design to post-market surveillance.
Key Components
- Organized into Clauses 4–8 covering QMS, management responsibility, resources, product realization, and measurement/improvement.
- Emphasizes documented processes, validation, traceability, supplier controls, and ISO 14971 risk integration.
- Requires quality manual, medical device files, and certification via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026) and reduces regulatory risks.
- Drives patient safety, cost savings via fewer recalls, and supply chain resilience.
- Builds stakeholder trust and competitive edge in partnerships.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, validation, audits.
- Suited for manufacturers, suppliers, all sizes; global applicability.
- Culminates in Stage 1/2 certification audits, ongoing surveillance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital operational resilience against ICT disruptions | Quality management for medical device lifecycle |
| Industry | EU financial sector and critical ICT providers | Global medical device manufacturers and suppliers |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement | Voluntary certification standard for compliance |
| Testing | Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT | Internal audits, process validation, certification audits |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover fines | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and ISO 13485
DORA FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting
Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r
From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring
Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and
Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UAE PDPL vs NIST 800-53
Compare UAE PDPL vs NIST 800-53: Gaps in breach timelines, DPIAs, DPOs & transfers. Align PDPL's GDPR-like rules with NIST controls for UAE compliance. Expert guide unlocks synergies—optimize now!
SOC 2 vs ISO 14064
Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 14064: SOC 2 secures data via Trust Criteria for SaaS; ISO 14064 quantifies GHG emissions for sustainability. Unlock compliance insights—read now!
ENERGY STAR vs ISA 95
Compare ENERGY STAR vs ISA 95: EPA's trusted energy efficiency cert for products, homes & buildings meets ISA's enterprise-control integration std. Boost savings & ops—explore now!