GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/SOC 2 vs ISO 14064
    Standards Comparison

    SOC 2 vs ISO 14064

    SOC 2

    Voluntary
    2010

    AICPA framework for service controls attestation

    VS

    ISO 14064

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification.

    Quick Verdict

    SOC 2 provides trust services criteria for data security in tech services, while ISO 14064 enables GHG emissions accounting and verification across industries. Companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise sales acceleration; ISO 14064 for regulatory compliance and decarbonization strategy.

    Cybersecurity / Trust

    SOC 2

    System and Organization Controls 2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
    • Type 2 reports prove operating effectiveness
    • Independent CPA firm attestation reports
    • Flexible scoping for service organizations
    • Maps to ISO 27001 and GDPR
    Greenhouse Gas Accounting

    ISO 14064

    ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases specification and guidance

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
    • Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
    • Scope 1-3 emission categorization and boundary setting
    • Risk-based validation/verification with materiality assessment
    • Alignment with GHG Protocol and regulatory frameworks

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SOC 2 Details

    What It Is

    SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework by the AICPA for service organizations. It assesses controls under Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy—focusing on data handling security via risk-based, principles-driven audits.

    Key Components

    • Five TSC domains, Security via Common CC1-CC9) requiring 50-100 controls.
    • Built on COSO principles for control environments.
    • Type 1 (point-in-time design) or Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).
    • CPA-audited reports with management assertions.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Market-driven for SaaS/cloud; accelerates enterprise sales by 15-30%.
    • No legal mandate but essential for vendor risk management.
    • Reduces breach liability, builds operational resilience.
    • Competitive moat unlocking partnerships, higher ACVs.
    • Enhances investor confidence, stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-8 weeks), deployment/monitoring (3-6 months), audit.
    • Leverage automation (Vanta, Drata) for evidence.
    • Suits all sizes in tech/fintech; US-centric, global adaptable.
    • Annual Type 2 recertification.

    ISO 14064 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. It is a modular framework for organizational inventories (Part 1), project-level reductions (Part 2), and validation/verification (Part 3), emphasizing a principle-based approach with five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.

    Key Components

    • Three interdependent parts: Organizational GHG inventories, project quantification, and assurance processes.
    • Core principles mirror GHG Protocol; no fixed controls but requirements for boundaries, data quality, uncertainty, and audit trails.
    • Compliance via self-reporting or third-party verification under ISO 14064-3, often paired with ISO 14065 accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables credible reporting for regulations (CSRD, SB-253), investors, and carbon markets.
    • Drives risk mitigation, operational efficiencies, and stakeholder trust through verifiable data.
    • Supports decarbonization strategies and competitive differentiation in green finance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: governance, boundary setting, data systems, reporting, verification.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized firms.
    • Optional third-party assurance enhances credibility.

    Key Differences

    AspectSOC 2ISO 14064
    ScopeSecurity, availability, confidentiality, privacy, integrityGHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification
    IndustrySaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globallyAll sectors with GHG footprints worldwide
    NatureVoluntary AICPA attestation frameworkVoluntary ISO standard family for GHG accounting
    TestingType 1/2 audits by CPA firms annuallyIndependent validation/verification per ISO 14064-3
    PenaltiesMarket exclusion, lost deals, no legal finesRegulatory fines in mandatory jurisdictions, reputational damage

    Scope

    SOC 2
    Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, integrity
    ISO 14064
    GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification

    Industry

    SOC 2
    SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally
    ISO 14064
    All sectors with GHG footprints worldwide

    Nature

    SOC 2
    Voluntary AICPA attestation framework
    ISO 14064
    Voluntary ISO standard family for GHG accounting

    Testing

    SOC 2
    Type 1/2 audits by CPA firms annually
    ISO 14064
    Independent validation/verification per ISO 14064-3

    Penalties

    SOC 2
    Market exclusion, lost deals, no legal fines
    ISO 14064
    Regulatory fines in mandatory jurisdictions, reputational damage

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 14064

    SOC 2 FAQ

    ISO 14064 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

    ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan

    Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

    Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

    Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles

    Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

    Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

    Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

    Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how SOC 2 and ISO 14064 compare against other standards

    Other SOC 2 Comparisons

    • SOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • SOC 2 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • SOC 2 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • OSHA vs SOC 2
    • AEO vs SOC 2

    Other ISO 14064 Comparisons

    • ISO 14064 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • ISO 14064 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • ISO 14064 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • NIST 800-171 vs ISO 14064
    • FSSC 22000 vs ISO 14064
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved