SOC 2 vs ISO 14064
SOC 2
AICPA framework for service controls attestation
ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification.
Quick Verdict
SOC 2 provides trust services criteria for data security in tech services, while ISO 14064 enables GHG emissions accounting and verification across industries. Companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise sales acceleration; ISO 14064 for regulatory compliance and decarbonization strategy.
SOC 2
System and Organization Controls 2
Key Features
- Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
- Type 2 reports prove operating effectiveness
- Independent CPA firm attestation reports
- Flexible scoping for service organizations
- Maps to ISO 27001 and GDPR
ISO 14064
ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases specification and guidance
Key Features
- Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
- Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Scope 1-3 emission categorization and boundary setting
- Risk-based validation/verification with materiality assessment
- Alignment with GHG Protocol and regulatory frameworks
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
SOC 2 Details
What It Is
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework by the AICPA for service organizations. It assesses controls under Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy—focusing on data handling security via risk-based, principles-driven audits.
Key Components
- Five TSC domains, Security via Common CC1-CC9) requiring 50-100 controls.
- Built on COSO principles for control environments.
- Type 1 (point-in-time design) or Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).
- CPA-audited reports with management assertions.
Why Organizations Use It
- Market-driven for SaaS/cloud; accelerates enterprise sales by 15-30%.
- No legal mandate but essential for vendor risk management.
- Reduces breach liability, builds operational resilience.
- Competitive moat unlocking partnerships, higher ACVs.
- Enhances investor confidence, stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-8 weeks), deployment/monitoring (3-6 months), audit.
- Leverage automation (Vanta, Drata) for evidence.
- Suits all sizes in tech/fintech; US-centric, global adaptable.
- Annual Type 2 recertification.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. It is a modular framework for organizational inventories (Part 1), project-level reductions (Part 2), and validation/verification (Part 3), emphasizing a principle-based approach with five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.
Key Components
- Three interdependent parts: Organizational GHG inventories, project quantification, and assurance processes.
- Core principles mirror GHG Protocol; no fixed controls but requirements for boundaries, data quality, uncertainty, and audit trails.
- Compliance via self-reporting or third-party verification under ISO 14064-3, often paired with ISO 14065 accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables credible reporting for regulations (CSRD, SB-253), investors, and carbon markets.
- Drives risk mitigation, operational efficiencies, and stakeholder trust through verifiable data.
- Supports decarbonization strategies and competitive differentiation in green finance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: governance, boundary setting, data systems, reporting, verification.
- Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized firms.
- Optional third-party assurance enhances credibility.
Key Differences
| Aspect | SOC 2 | ISO 14064 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, integrity | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification |
| Industry | SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally | All sectors with GHG footprints worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary AICPA attestation framework | Voluntary ISO standard family for GHG accounting |
| Testing | Type 1/2 audits by CPA firms annually | Independent validation/verification per ISO 14064-3 |
| Penalties | Market exclusion, lost deals, no legal fines | Regulatory fines in mandatory jurisdictions, reputational damage |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 14064
SOC 2 FAQ
ISO 14064 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments
Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how SOC 2 and ISO 14064 compare against other standards