What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates controls over systems handling customer data, with **Security (CC1-CC9)** mandatory and others optional based on services provided.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework driven by market demands from enterprise customers.** It professionally targets **service organizations** like SaaS, cloud, and fintech providers that store, process, or transmit customer data, especially those pursuing deals with ACV $5K+ where buyers mandate Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 assesses control design at a point in time; Type 2 verifies design and **operating effectiveness** over 3-12 months via evidence testing, including penetration tests and sampling.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture full control cycles and maintain trust.** Bridge letters from management can extend validity up to 3 months between audits, confirming no material changes during the gap period.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with SOC 2 results in lost enterprise deals, as 70-80% of SaaS contracts require Type 2 reports, extending sales cycles by 3-6 months and inflating CAC by 20-50%.** It heightens breach liability under laws like CCPA, reputational damage, and exclusion from marketplaces like Salesforce AppExchange.

Can **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps effectively to other frameworks, with 80% control overlap enabling shared evidence.** AICPA TSC like CC series align with ISO 27001 (114 controls), NIST CSF, and GDPR/HIPAA, streamlining multi-compliance without dual certifications.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria.** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and TSC (starting with mandatory Security), then engage a CPA for readiness assessment to prioritize 50-100 controls.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 14064**?

**ISO 14064 provides requirements and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals.** The standard family comprises three parts: **ISO 14064-1:2018** for organizational-level inventories, **ISO 14064-2:2019** for project-level reductions/removals, and **ISO 14064-3:2019** for validation/verification. It enforces five core principles—**relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy**—to ensure credible, comparable GHG statements supporting regulatory reporting, investor disclosure, and climate finance.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 14064**?

**No organization is legally mandated to comply with ISO 14064, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It is professionally required for entities preparing credible GHG inventories, including companies in energy-intensive sectors, project developers (e.g., renewable energy, CCS), governments, NGOs, and verification bodies. Stakeholders such as investors, regulators (e.g., under CSRD or SB-253), and carbon market participants demand ISO 14064-aligned reporting for auditability and comparability.

Does **ISO 14064** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 14064 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** Parts 1 and 2 specify quantification and reporting requirements, while **ISO 14064-3** provides optional guidance for validation/verification by competent, impartial bodies (often aligned with **ISO 14065:2020**). In practice, third-party assurance at limited or reasonable levels enhances credibility for market participation, though it remains voluntary.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 14064** be performed?

**ISO 14064 assessments should be performed annually to maintain consistency and track performance against a selected base year.** Organizational inventories under **ISO 14064-1** cover a defined reporting period (typically calendar or fiscal year), with base-year recalculations for significant structural changes (e.g., acquisitions). Project monitoring under **ISO 14064-2** follows the defined plan, often continuous or periodic, to quantify net GHG benefits.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 14064**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 14064 carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect consequences include rejected GHG claims in carbon markets, failed stakeholder assurances, regulatory scrutiny under disclosure regimes (e.g., CSRD fines), investor distrust, and greenwashing risks. Poorly prepared inventories may yield adverse verification opinions under **ISO 14064-3**, eroding credibility.

Can **ISO 14064** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 14064 aligns closely with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, sharing identical principles (relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy).** It supports interoperability for Scopes 1-3, base-year adjustments, and Scope 3 categories, facilitating dual reporting without violating independence rules.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 14064**?

**The first step is defining organizational and operational boundaries per ISO 14064-1.** Select consolidation approach (**equity share** or **control**—financial/operational), identify emission sources/sinks across Scopes 1-3, and document relevance criteria to reflect economic reality.

SOC 2 vs ISO 14064

Standards Comparison

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service controls attestation

ISO 14064

Voluntary

2018

International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification.

Quick Verdict

SOC 2 provides trust services criteria for data security in tech services, while ISO 14064 enables GHG emissions accounting and verification across industries. Companies adopt SOC 2 for enterprise sales acceleration; ISO 14064 for regulatory compliance and decarbonization strategy.

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
Type 2 reports prove operating effectiveness
Independent CPA firm attestation reports
Flexible scoping for service organizations
Maps to ISO 27001 and GDPR

Greenhouse Gas Accounting

ISO 14064

ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases specification and guidance

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, verification
Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
Scope 1-3 emission categorization and boundary setting
Risk-based validation/verification with materiality assessment
Alignment with GHG Protocol and regulatory frameworks

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary attestation framework by the AICPA for service organizations. It assesses controls under Trust Services Criteria (TSC)—Security (mandatory), Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy—focusing on data handling security via risk-based, principles-driven audits.

Key Components

Five TSC domains, Security via Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) requiring 50-100 controls.
Built on COSO principles for control environments.
Type 1 (point-in-time design) or Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months).
CPA-audited reports with management assertions.

Why Organizations Use It

Market-driven for SaaS/cloud; accelerates enterprise sales by 15-30%.
No legal mandate but essential for vendor risk management.
Reduces breach liability, builds operational resilience.
Competitive moat unlocking partnerships, higher ACVs.
Enhances investor confidence, stakeholder trust.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-8 weeks), deployment/monitoring (3-6 months), audit.
Leverage automation (Vanta, Drata) for evidence.
Suits all sizes in tech/fintech; US-centric, global adaptable.
Annual Type 2 recertification.

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. It is a modular framework for organizational inventories (Part 1), project-level reductions (Part 2), and validation/verification (Part 3), emphasizing a principle-based approach with five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.

Key Components

**Three interdependent partsOrganizational GHG inventories, project quantification, and assurance processes.
Core principles mirror GHG Protocol; no fixed controls but requirements for boundaries, data quality, uncertainty, and audit trails.
Compliance via self-reporting or third-party verification under ISO 14064-3, often paired with ISO 14065 accredited bodies.

Why Organizations Use It

Enables credible reporting for regulations (CSRD, SB-253), investors, and carbon markets.
Drives risk mitigation, operational efficiencies, and stakeholder trust through verifiable data.
Supports decarbonization strategies and competitive differentiation in green finance.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: governance, boundary setting, data systems, reporting, verification.
Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized firms.
Optional third-party assurance enhances credibility.

Key Differences

Aspect	SOC 2	ISO 14064
Scope	Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, integrity	GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification
Industry	SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally	All sectors with GHG footprints worldwide
Nature	Voluntary AICPA attestation framework	Voluntary ISO standard family for GHG accounting
Testing	Type 1/2 audits by CPA firms annually	Independent validation/verification per ISO 14064-3
Penalties	Market exclusion, lost deals, no legal fines	Regulatory fines in mandatory jurisdictions, reputational damage

Scope

SOC 2

Security, availability, confidentiality, privacy, integrity

ISO 14064

GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification

Industry

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, tech service organizations globally

ISO 14064

All sectors with GHG footprints worldwide

Nature

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA attestation framework

ISO 14064

Voluntary ISO standard family for GHG accounting

Testing

SOC 2

Type 1/2 audits by CPA firms annually

ISO 14064

Independent validation/verification per ISO 14064-3

Penalties

SOC 2

Market exclusion, lost deals, no legal fines

ISO 14064

Regulatory fines in mandatory jurisdictions, reputational damage

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about SOC 2 and ISO 14064

SOC 2 FAQ

ISO 14064 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation

Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000

Compare MLPS 2.0 (China's graded cyber regime) vs ISO 28000 supply chain security. Uncover key gaps, compliance strategies & best practices for global ops in China. (152 characters)

FSSC 22000 vs ISO 27701

Compare FSSC 22000 food safety certification vs ISO 27701 privacy management. Key differences in requirements, audits & benefits for compliance. Choose wisely—read now!

GMP vs TISAX

Compare GMP vs TISAX: Pharma quality controls meet automotive cybersecurity. Uncover differences, overlaps & strategies for compliance in manufacturing. Secure your supply chain now!

SOC 2

ISO 14064

Quick Verdict

SOC 2

Key Features

ISO 14064

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

Can SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

ISO 14064 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 14064?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 14064?

Does ISO 14064 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 14064 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 14064?

Can ISO 14064 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 14064?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000

FSSC 22000 vs ISO 27701

GMP vs TISAX