What is the primary objective of **DORA**?

**The primary objective of DORA is to strengthen the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector against ICT disruptions, including cyberattacks, system failures, and third-party risks.** Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 mandates proactive ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and third-party oversight for 20 types of financial entities and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), entering full application on January 17, 2025.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **DORA**?

**DORA legally requires compliance from approximately 22,000 EU-regulated financial entities across 20 types, including credit institutions, insurance undertakings, investment firms, payment institutions, and crypto-asset service providers, plus critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs).** CTPPs, such as cloud and data analytics firms, face direct ESA oversight, with ~1,000+ providers in the EU landscape; proportionality applies based on size, complexity, and risk exposure.

Does **DORA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**DORA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires independent digital operational resilience testing, including annual basic tests and triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical entities.** Testing must be risk-based, with results reported to authorities; third-party oversight includes contractual audit rights for CTPPs, enforced via Joint Examination Teams (JETs).

How often should an assessment for **DORA** be performed?

**DORA mandates annual basic ICT resilience tests, such as vulnerability assessments, for all in-scope entities, with triennial advanced threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical or designated entities.** ICT risk management frameworks require annual reviews, integrated with incident response simulations and third-party risk assessments to maintain proportionality and evolving threat alignment.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **DORA**?

**Non-compliance with DORA incurs administrative fines up to 2% of total global annual turnover for firms or €5 million (or 10% of annual salary) for individuals, imposed by ESAs or competent authorities.** Additional penalties include oversight fees up to €1 million annually for CTPPs, remediation orders, and public naming, with enforcement starting post-January 17, 2025.

An **DORA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, DORA's ICT risk management, incident reporting, testing, and third-party oversight pillars can be mapped to other international frameworks, leveraging existing controls for efficiency.** Financial entities often align DORA's proportional requirements—such as 4-hour incident notifications and TLPT—with global standards, though finance-specific harmonization via 2024 RTS/ITS ensures tailored implementation.

What is the first step to begin implementing **DORA**?

**The first step to implement DORA is conducting a gap analysis against the ICT risk management framework outlined in Batch 1 RTS (published January 17, 2024).** This identifies deficiencies in strategies for ICT risks, incident classification (>5% user impact or €100,000+ losses), third-party dependencies, and testing plans, prioritizing management body approval ahead of the January 17, 2025 deadline.

What is the primary objective of **LEED**?

**LEED's primary objective is to provide a globally recognized framework for designing, constructing, and operating healthy, efficient, and cost-effective green buildings.** Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), it translates sustainability goals into verifiable prerequisites and credits across categories like Energy and Atmosphere (EA, up to 35 points), Sustainable Sites (SS, 26 points), and Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), enabling certification at tiers: Certified (40–49 points), Silver (50–59), Gold (60–79), or Platinum (80+ of 110 total points).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LEED**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with LEED, as it is a voluntary rating system.** Professionally, it applies to project owners, developers, architects, and facility managers pursuing certification for new construction (BD+C), interiors (ID+C), operations (O+M), neighborhoods (ND), residential, or cities projects to achieve market differentiation, ESG reporting, incentives, and verified performance benchmarks.

Does **LEED** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, LEED requires third-party certification by Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI).** Projects register via Arc (LEED v5) or LEED Online (v4/v4.1), submit documentation for prerequisites and credits, undergo phased GBCI reviews (preliminary and final), and may use Credit Interpretation Rulings (CIRs) for guidance, ensuring credible verification beyond self-reporting.

How often should an assessment for **LEED** be performed?

**Initial LEED assessment occurs during design/construction for BD+C/ID+C or over a performance period (e.g., 3–24 months) for O+M; recertification is recommended every 5 years or annually via O+M pathways.** O+M requires at least one year of operational data with continuous performance periods and overlap rules to demonstrate sustained compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LEED**?

**Non-compliance with LEED results in certification denial or revocation, loss of market credibility, and forfeited incentives.** Prerequisites (e.g., minimum energy performance, IAQ) must be met; failures invalidate projects despite earned credits, potentially causing rework costs, missed ESG claims, and reputational harm without legal penalties as it is voluntary.

An **LEED** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LEED can be mapped to other frameworks, though specifics vary by version and project type.** Its categories (e.g., EA to energy codes like ASHRAE 90.1, IEQ to WELL) align with ESG reporting, net-zero goals, and regional standards, using scorecards for crosswalks; USGBC provides resources like credit libraries for integration without formal equivalency.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LEED**?

**The first step is to select the appropriate rating system (e.g., BD+C, O+M) and version (v5, v4.1), confirm Minimum Program Requirements (MPRs), and register the project in Arc or LEED Online.** Develop an initial scorecard targeting certification tiers, prioritizing high-impact credits like EA via early gap analysis and team charrette.

DORA vs LEED | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

DORA

Mandatory

2023

EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

LEED

Voluntary

1998

Global green building certification for sustainable performance.

Quick Verdict

DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms against cyber threats, while LEED voluntarily certifies sustainable buildings worldwide for energy efficiency and health. Financial entities comply with DORA to avoid fines; developers pursue LEED for cost savings, market value, and ESG leadership.

Digital Operational Resilience

DORA

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
Requires 4-hour major incident reporting timelines
Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing
Oversees critical third-party ICT providers directly
Harmonizes resilience across 20 financial entity types

Green Building

LEED

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Third-party verification by GBCI for credibility
Point-based scoring with prerequisites and credits
Tailored rating systems for project types
Heavy weighting on energy and atmosphere
Recertification pathways for operations

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

DORA Details

What It Is

Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is a transformative EU regulation for bolstering ICT resilience in finance. It addresses disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures via a risk-based, proportional approach, applying to 20 financial entity types (e.g., banks, insurers) and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs). Enacted 2022, full application January 17, 2025.

Key Components

**ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks for identifying, mitigating risks with annual reviews.
**Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates, 1-month analyses for major events.
**Resilience TestingAnnual basic ICT tests; triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
**Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, ESA supervision of CTPPs. Built on harmonization, enforced by ESAs without formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance avoids fines up to 2% global turnover.
Mitigates cyber risks (74% firms affected by ransomware).
Enhances systemic resilience, stakeholder trust.
Drives tool innovation, integrates with NIS2/Solvency II.

Implementation Overview

Gap analyses, policy updates, testing programs, vendor strategies. Proportional to size/complexity; ~22,000 EU entities. Large firms leverage existing frameworks; SMEs face challenges. Key activities: simulations, reporting tools, audits. Typical timeline: 18-24 months.

LEED Details

What It Is

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is a voluntary green building certification framework developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). Its primary purpose is to promote sustainable design, construction, and operations across building types and lifecycle phases. LEED uses a performance-based approach with prerequisites, credits, and third-party verification.

Key Components

Core categories: Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy & Atmosphere, Materials & Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality, Innovation, Regional Priority.
Up to 110 points total; certification tiers: Certified (40-49), Silver (50-59), Gold (60-79), Platinum (80+).
Rating systems: BD+C, ID+C, O+M, ND, Residential, Cities.
Prerequisites ensure baselines; credits reward improvements.

Why Organizations Use It

Reduces operating costs, enhances asset value, mitigates risks.
Meets ESG goals, attracts tenants/investors.
Builds reputation via credible third-party certification.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, design, construction, verification.
Applies to all sizes/industries; GBCI audits required.
O+M enables recertification for sustained performance.

Key Differences

Aspect	DORA	LEED
Scope	Digital operational resilience in finance	Green building sustainability performance
Industry	EU financial entities and ICT providers	Global building owners and developers
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement	Voluntary third-party certification
Testing	Annual basic, triennial TLPT by authorities	Commissioning, energy modeling, verification
Penalties	Up to 2% global turnover fines	Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Scope

DORA

Digital operational resilience in finance

LEED

Green building sustainability performance

Industry

DORA

EU financial entities and ICT providers

LEED

Global building owners and developers

Nature

DORA

Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement

LEED

Voluntary third-party certification

Testing

DORA

Annual basic, triennial TLPT by authorities

LEED

Commissioning, energy modeling, verification

Penalties

DORA

Up to 2% global turnover fines

LEED

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about DORA and LEED

DORA FAQ

LEED FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks

Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 37301 vs POPIA

Compare ISO 37301 certifiable CMS vs POPIA privacy law: leadership, risk planning, security & rights. Align for integrated compliance & UN SDGs. Optimize now!

LEED vs EU AI Act

Compare LEED certification vs EU AI Act: sustainability standards meet AI risk rules. Master compliance strategies for green buildings & high-risk systems. Boost ESG now.

LGPD vs NIST 800-171

Explore LGPD vs NIST 800-171: Brazil's GDPR-like privacy law vs US CUI security std. Uncover key diffs, compliance risks, strategies & global implementation tips now.

DORA

LEED

Quick Verdict

DORA

Key Features

LEED

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

DORA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

LEED Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

DORA FAQ

What is the primary objective of DORA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with DORA?

Does DORA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for DORA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with DORA?

An DORA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing DORA?

LEED FAQ

What is the primary objective of LEED?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LEED?

Does LEED require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LEED be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LEED?

An LEED be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LEED?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 37301 vs POPIA

LEED vs EU AI Act

LGPD vs NIST 800-171