LGPD
Brazil's comprehensive regulation for personal data protection
NIST 800-171
U.S. standard for protecting CUI in nonfederal systems.
Quick Verdict
LGPD mandates personal data protection for Brazilian residents with fines up to 2% revenue, while NIST 800-171 requires CUI safeguards for US federal contractors via SSPs and assessments. Companies adopt LGPD for legal compliance in Brazil; NIST for contract eligibility.
LGPD
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law 13.709/2018)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope targeting Brazilian residents globally
- Ten legal bases including credit protection and public policy
- Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue capped at R$50 million
- Mandatory DPO appointment for controllers with public disclosure
- Ten core principles expanding GDPR with prevention, non-discrimination
NIST 800-171
NIST SP 800-171 Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems
Key Features
- Scoped CUI protection via security domains
- 110 requirements in 17 control families (Rev 3)
- SSP and POA&M documentation mandates
- SP 800-171A assessment procedures
- DFARS contractual enforcement and scoring
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
LGPD Details
What It Is
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. It governs collection, processing, and transfer of personal data, with extraterritorial scope for any processing targeting Brazilian residents. Adopts a risk-based approach emphasizing accountability, minimization, and data subject rights, enforced by ANPD.
Key Components
- **Ten core principlespurpose limitation, adequacy, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability, plus free access and data quality.
- Ten legal bases for processing, including consent, legitimate interest, credit protection.
- Data subject rights: access, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization.
- Mandatory records (RoPA), DPIAs for high-risk activities, DPO for controllers; compliance via governance and audits, no formal certification but ANPD oversight.
Why Organizations Use It
LGPD compliance avoids fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap), operational suspensions, litigation. Builds trust, enables market access, reduces AI risks, drives efficiency via data inventories. Strategic for e-commerce, fintech, healthcare targeting Brazil.
Implementation Overview
Phased risk-based methodology: governance, data mapping, policies, controls, DSRs, monitoring. Applies to all sizes processing Brazilian data; involves cross-functional teams, vendor DPAs, training. Ongoing program with ANPD guidance updates.
NIST 800-171 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-171 (Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations) is a U.S. government cybersecurity framework providing recommended security requirements for safeguarding CUI confidentiality. Tailored from NIST SP 800-53 Moderate baseline, it uses a control-based approach focused on nonfederal systems processing, storing, or transmitting CUI.
Key Components
- 17 families in Rev 3 (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management), with ~97-110 requirements.
- Built on FIPS 200 and SP 800-53; includes SSP, POA&M, and SP 800-171A assessment procedures (examine/interview/test).
- Compliance via self-assessment or third-party (e.g., CMMC Level 2).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal contractors via DFARS 252.204-7012; enables DoD contract eligibility.
- Reduces breach risk, builds supply chain trust, supports FedRAMP equivalence.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scope CUI enclave, gap analysis, implement controls (MFA, SIEM), document SSP/POA&M. Applies to contractors globally; audits via SPRS/CMMC. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | LGPD | NIST 800-171 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection, processing rules, rights | CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems |
| Industry | All sectors processing Brazilian data, extraterritorial | DoD contractors, federal supply chain, US-focused |
| Nature | Mandatory regulation, ANPD enforcement, fines | Contractual security requirements, NIST guidance |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk, ANPD audits | SSP/POA&M, SP 800-171A assessments, CMMC |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue, R$50M cap | Contract loss, ineligibility, no direct fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about LGPD and NIST 800-171
LGPD FAQ
NIST 800-171 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs IFS Food
CSL vs IFS Food: China's Cybersecurity Law data rules vs global food safety standard. Master compliance risks, strategies, pillars & phased guides for MNCs. Comply smarter now!
NIST CSF vs 23 NYCRR 500
Expert comparison: NIST CSF vs 23 NYCRR 500—key differences, overlaps, mappings & strategies for seamless NYDFS compliance. Strengthen your program today!
TOGAF vs ISO 56002
Compare TOGAF vs ISO 56002: EA framework for IT governance battles innovation system for value creation. Gain insights on alignment, ADM phases & PDCA to drive transformation. Choose your edge!