What is the primary objective of **DORA**?

**DORA's primary objective is to strengthen the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector against ICT disruptions, including cyberattacks, system failures, and third-party risks.** Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 mandates proactive ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and third-party oversight for 20 types of financial entities and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), applying fully from January 17, 2025.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **DORA**?

**DORA legally requires compliance from approximately 22,000 EU-regulated financial entities across 20 types, including credit institutions, insurance undertakings, investment firms, payment institutions, and crypto-asset service providers, plus critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs).** CTPPs, such as cloud and data analytics firms, face direct ESA oversight, with ~1,000+ providers in the EU landscape subject to designation by end-2025.

Does **DORA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**DORA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires risk-based digital operational resilience testing, including independent annual basic tests and triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical entities.** Testing may involve external providers, with results reported to authorities; third-party oversight includes contractual audit rights for CTPPs.

How often should an assessment for **DORA** be performed?

**DORA mandates annual basic ICT resilience tests, such as vulnerability assessments, for all in-scope entities, with triennial advanced TLPT for critical or designated entities.** ICT risk management frameworks require annual reviews, proportional to entity size, complexity, and risk exposure, integrating recovery time objectives (RTOs) below 4 hours for critical services.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **DORA**?

**Non-compliance with DORA incurs administrative fines up to 2% of total global annual turnover for firms or €5 million (or 10% of annual salary) for individuals, imposed by ESAs or competent authorities.** Additional penalties include oversight fees up to €1 million annually for CTPPs, remediation orders, and public naming for severe breaches.

Can **DORA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**DORA's ICT risk management, incident reporting, testing, and third-party oversight elements can be mapped to international frameworks, though it stands as a harmonized EU-specific regime.** Its principles align with global resilience standards, enabling gap analyses for entities with existing programs, per ESAs' RTS on ICT frameworks published January 17, 2024.

What is the first step to begin implementing **DORA**?

**The first step for DORA implementation is conducting a gap analysis against the ICT risk management framework RTS to identify, assess, and prioritize ICT risks.** Establish a comprehensive framework overseen by the management body, mapping dependencies on CTPPs and integrating proportionality based on entity size, with full application required by January 17, 2025.

What is the primary objective of **TISAX**?

**TISAX's primary objective is to standardize information security assessments and enable secure exchange of results across the automotive supply chain.** Developed by the ENX Association using the VDA ISA catalog version 5.0.4 (updated to 6.0 in 2023), it verifies protection of sensitive data like IP, prototypes, and personal information against cyber threats via three maturity levels: Basic, Significant, and Very High.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **TISAX**?

**TISAX is a contractual requirement, not legal, for automotive OEMs, Tier 1/Tier 2 suppliers, service providers, and logistics firms handling sensitive data.** Mandated by OEMs like Volkswagen and BMW in RFPs, it applies to any entity processing OEM IP, prototypes, or ADAS software, scalable from SMEs (self-assessments) to multinationals.

Does **TISAX** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, TISAX requires external audits by ENX-accredited providers like DQS or TÜV for Significant and Very High levels.** AL1 is self-assessment (no label); AL2 involves remote plausibility checks; AL3 mandates on-site audits with interviews and facility inspections, resulting in a TISAX Label valid for three years, uploaded to the ENX portal.

How often should an assessment for **TISAX** be performed?

**TISAX assessments must be fully repeated every three years to renew the Label.** No annual surveillance audits are required, but organizations conduct internal audits, tabletop exercises, and quarterly reviews using PDCA for continuous monitoring; reassess scopes after major changes like new OEM contracts.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **TISAX**?

**Non-compliance results in contractual termination, lost OEM portal access, and revenue forfeiture up to €10-50 million annually for mid-tier suppliers.** ENX-partnered OEMs impose penalties up to 5% of contract value, plus €20,000-€100,000 re-audit costs, reputational damage, and production halts in just-in-time chains.

Can **TISAX** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, TISAX maps extensively to ISO 27001, using its ISMS structure and Annex A controls as the VDA ISA base.** It incorporates 70+ automotive-specific controls across seven groups (Policy, Access, Operations), enabling 20-30% efficiency in joint implementations via shared evidence and integrated audits.

What is the first step to begin implementing **TISAX**?

**The first step is registering on the ENX portal (tisax.org) and defining the Assessment Scope and Leadership Profile (ASLP).** Collaborate with OEMs to classify protection needs (Normal/High/Very High), download VDA ISA Excel for gap analysis across 70+ controls, and assemble a cross-functional team.

DORA vs TISAX | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

DORA

Mandatory

2023

EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

TISAX

Mandatory

2017

Automotive framework for standardized information security assessments

Quick Verdict

DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance against cyber threats via testing and reporting, while TISAX standardizes voluntary security assessments for automotive suppliers protecting prototypes and IP. Firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance, TISAX for contracts and trust.

Digital Operational Resilience

DORA

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks overseen by management
Enforces 4-hour initial major incident reporting timelines
Requires triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
Oversees critical third-party ICT providers via ESAs
Harmonizes resilience across 20 financial entity types

Cybersecurity

TISAX

Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange (TISAX)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

ENX portal enables secure sharing of assessment results
Three risk-based assessment levels (AL1-AL3)
VDA ISA catalog with 70+ automotive controls
Specialized prototype protection modules
Reduces duplicate audits across supply chain

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

DORA Details

What It Is

Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulatory framework enhancing digital resilience against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and third-party failures. Applicable from January 17, 2025, it uses a risk-based, proportional approach for 20 financial entity types and CTPPs.

Key Components

DORA comprises four pillars:

**ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks for identifying, mitigating risks with annual reviews.
**Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour intermediate notifications for major events.
**Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT.
**Third-Party OversightContractual clauses, monitoring, ESA supervision via JETs. Compliance follows RTS/ITS standards.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for EU finance to avoid 2% turnover fines. Mitigates systemic risks (74% ransomware hit), boosts resilience post-outages like CrowdStrike, enhances trust, drives €10-15B cybersecurity investments.

Implementation Overview

Gap analyses, policy builds, testing programs, vendor due diligence. Tailored by size/complexity for ~22,000 entities; authority oversight, no certification, urgent pre-2025 deadline.

TISAX Details

What It Is

TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an industry-specific assessment framework developed by the ENX Association on behalf of the VDA, tailored for the automotive supply chain. Its primary purpose is to verify and exchange information security capabilities, protecting sensitive data like IP, prototypes, and personal information against cyber threats. It employs a risk-based approach with maturity levels tied to protection needs (normal, high, very high).

Key Components

VDA ISA catalog (version 5.0.4/6.0): 70+ controls across 7 groups (policy, organization, access, operations, etc.).
**Assessment levelsAL1 (self-assessment), AL2 (remote audit), AL3 (on-site audit).
Built on ISO 27001 with automotive-specific modules like prototype protection.
ENX portal for label sharing; labels valid 3 years.

Why Organizations Use It

Contractual mandates from OEMs (e.g., BMW, VW) prevent revenue loss.
Reduces duplicate audits (70-90% efficiency), enhances market access.
Mitigates risks (breaches cost €4.5M avg.), builds trust.
Strategic ROI: resilience, innovation in EVs/ADAS.

Implementation Overview

Phased (6-18 months): scope/gap analysis, control remediation, audits by accredited providers (e.g., TÜV, DQS). Scalable for SMEs/enterprises in automotive ecosystem; tabletop exercises key. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	DORA	TISAX
Scope	ICT risk mgmt, resilience testing, third-party oversight	Info sec, prototype protection, supply chain controls
Industry	EU financial sector only	Automotive supply chain globally
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation	Voluntary industry assessment
Testing	Annual basic, triennial TLPT	AL1 self, AL2 remote, AL3 onsite audits
Penalties	Up to 2% global turnover fines	Contract loss, no legal fines

Scope

DORA

ICT risk mgmt, resilience testing, third-party oversight

TISAX

Info sec, prototype protection, supply chain controls

Industry

DORA

EU financial sector only

TISAX

Automotive supply chain globally

Nature

DORA

Mandatory EU regulation

TISAX

Voluntary industry assessment

Testing

DORA

Annual basic, triennial TLPT

TISAX

AL1 self, AL2 remote, AL3 onsite audits

Penalties

DORA

Up to 2% global turnover fines

TISAX

Contract loss, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about DORA and TISAX

DORA FAQ

TISAX FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GRI vs IATF 16949

Compare GRI vs IATF 16949: GRI excels in impact materiality for sustainability & HES reporting, while IATF ensures automotive QMS with core tools like APQP/FMEA. Master differences for compliance success—explore now!

HIPAA vs BRC

Compare HIPAA vs BRC: Master healthcare privacy/security rules & food safety standards. Unlock risk analysis, compliance strategies & best practices to safeguard PHI/ePHI now!

PDPA vs REACH

Discover PDPA vs REACH: Compare Asia's data privacy laws (Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan PDPA) with EU chemicals regulation. Unlock compliance strategies for global ops success.

DORA

TISAX

Quick Verdict

DORA

Key Features

TISAX

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

DORA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

TISAX Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

DORA FAQ

What is the primary objective of DORA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with DORA?

Does DORA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for DORA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with DORA?

Can DORA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing DORA?

TISAX FAQ

What is the primary objective of TISAX?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with TISAX?

Does TISAX require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for TISAX be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with TISAX?

Can TISAX be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing TISAX?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GRI vs IATF 16949

HIPAA vs BRC

PDPA vs REACH