What is the primary objective of **DORA**?

**The primary objective of DORA is to strengthen the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector against ICT disruptions, including cyberattacks, system failures, and third-party risks.** Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 mandates proactive ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and third-party oversight for 20 types of financial entities and critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs), entering full application on January 17, 2025.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **DORA**?

**DORA applies to approximately 22,000 EU-regulated financial entities across 20 types, including credit institutions, insurance undertakings, investment firms, payment institutions, and crypto-asset service providers, plus critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs).** Critical providers like cloud and data analytics firms face direct ESA oversight, with designation expected by end-2025.

Does **DORA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**DORA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires independent digital operational resilience testing, including annual basic tests and triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical entities.** Testing must be risk-based, with results reported to authorities; third-party oversight includes contractual audit rights for CTPPs.

How often should an assessment for **DORA** be performed?

**DORA requires annual basic ICT resilience tests for all in-scope entities and triennial advanced threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) for critical or designated entities.** ICT risk management frameworks must undergo annual reviews, with testing tailored proportionally to size, complexity, and risk exposure per ESAs' RTS.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **DORA**?

**Non-compliance with DORA can result in administrative fines up to 2% of total global annual turnover for firms or €5 million (or 10% of annual salary) for individuals, imposed by ESAs or competent authorities.** Additional penalties include oversight fees up to €1 million annually for CTPPs and reputational damage from public reporting.

Can **DORA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, DORA's ICT risk management, incident reporting, testing, and third-party oversight elements can be mapped to other international frameworks, leveraging existing compliance for efficiency.** Financial entities often align DORA's proportional controls and reporting timelines with prior EBA guidelines or sector-specific rules like Solvency II.

What is the first step to begin implementing **DORA**?

**The first step to implement DORA is to conduct a gap analysis against the ESAs' Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) on ICT risk frameworks, published January 17, 2024.** This identifies deficiencies in ICT strategies, incident classification, third-party dependencies, and testing plans ahead of the January 17, 2025, application date.

What is the primary objective of **TOGAF**?

**TOGAF's primary objective is to provide a vendor-neutral methodology and framework for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise architecture to improve business efficiency.** The **Architecture Development Method (ADM)** enables iterative development across business, data, application, and technology domains, supported by the **Content Framework**, **Enterprise Continuum**, and **Architecture Capability Framework** for consistent standards, reuse, and alignment of strategy with IT execution.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **TOGAF**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with TOGAF, as it is a voluntary, vendor-neutral standard developed by The Open Group.** Professionally, large enterprises, government agencies, and regulated sectors (e.g., finance, defense) adopt it for enterprise architecture governance; leading organizations use it to standardize practices, with over 1 million certified practitioners ensuring consistent application.

Does **TOGAF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**TOGAF does not require external audits or third-party certification for framework compliance.** Organizations establish internal **Architecture Boards** for governance and **compliance reviews** via the **Architecture Capability Framework**; The Open Group offers practitioner certifications (e.g., TOGAF 9.2, 10th Edition) to build skills, but these are optional for capability maturity.

How often should an assessment for **TOGAF** be performed?

**TOGAF assessments, via the Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM), should be performed initially during the Preliminary Phase and repeated quarterly or annually.** **Phase H (Architecture Change Management)** mandates ongoing monitoring of change triggers, with iterative ADM cycles ensuring continual adaptation; maturity re-assessments track progress across nine elements like governance and business linkage.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **TOGAF**?

**Non-compliance with TOGAF results in no legal penalties, as it is not a mandated regulation.** Internally, it leads to fragmented architectures, duplicated efforts, vendor lock-in, failed transformations, increased technical debt, and poor ROI; without **ADM governance** and **reuse via Enterprise Continuum**, organizations face higher costs, integration risks, and misaligned IT investments.

Can **TOGAF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, TOGAF can be mapped to other frameworks through its modular structure and integration guidance in the 10th Edition.** The **ADM** and **Content Metamodel** align with complementary standards via tailored phases and **Enterprise Continuum**, enabling consistent governance while avoiding proprietary lock-in.

What is the first step to begin implementing **TOGAF**?

**The first step to implement TOGAF is the Preliminary Phase to establish architecture capability.** Define **architecture principles**, tailor the framework, set up the **Architecture Repository**, form the **Architecture Board**, and produce a Request for Architecture Work to scope and prepare the organization.

DORA vs TOGAF | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

DORA

Mandatory

2023

EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

TOGAF

Voluntary

2022

Vendor-neutral standard for enterprise architecture methodology

Quick Verdict

DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance firms with testing and fines, while TOGAF provides voluntary EA methodology for global enterprises to align business and IT. Firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance, TOGAF for strategic efficiency.

Digital Operational Resilience

DORA

Digital Operational Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Harmonized EU-wide ICT risk management frameworks
4-hour initial reporting for major ICT incidents
Mandatory triennial threat-led penetration testing
Oversight of critical third-party ICT providers
Proportionality principle by entity size and risk

Enterprise Architecture

TOGAF

The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM) lifecycle
Content Framework and Metamodel for artifacts
Enterprise Continuum for asset classification and reuse
Reference models like TRM, SIB, and III-RM
Architecture Capability Framework with governance board

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

DORA Details

What It Is

Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulation enhancing digital operational resilience of the financial sector against ICT risks like cyberattacks and failures. It targets 20 financial entity types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs) across 27 member states. Employs a risk-based, proportional approach with comprehensive ICT strategies.

Key Components

**ICT Risk Management FrameworksStrategies for risk identification, mitigation, and annual reviews.
**Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour intermediate, 1-month root-cause reports.
**Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
**Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Compliance enforced via RTS/ITS, penalties up to 2% global turnover.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated for ~22,000 entities to avoid fines, bolster resilience amid 74% ransomware exposure. Enhances continuity, stakeholder trust, and integrates with EBA/NIS2 rules. Drives cybersecurity innovation and systemic risk mitigation.

Implementation Overview

Conduct gap analyses, develop frameworks, implement testing/vendor management. Applies EU-wide proportionally by size/complexity; full enforcement January 17, 2025. Authority audits and ongoing reviews required.

TOGAF Details

What It Is

TOGAF® Standard (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework and methodology. It provides a proven, iterative approach for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change across business and IT. At its core is the Architecture Development Method (ADM), a cyclical lifecycle.

Key Components

**ADM phases10 phases from Preliminary to Change Management, spanning business, information systems, and technology domains.
**Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks, and metamodel for structured outputs.
Enterprise Continuum and reference models (TRM, SIB, III-RM) for reuse.
Architecture Capability Framework for governance. Practitioner certification available, no organizational certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns strategy with execution for efficiency, ROI, and reduced duplication.
Enables risk management, agility, and vendor neutrality.
Voluntary adoption drives competitive advantages like faster transformations and stakeholder trust.

Implementation Overview

Phased rollout with maturity assessment, tailoring, governance setup, pilots. Ideal for large enterprises across industries; requires training, tools, iterative ADM application.

Key Differences

Aspect	DORA	TOGAF
Scope	Digital operational resilience in finance	Enterprise architecture across business/IT
Industry	EU financial sector only	All industries worldwide
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation	Voluntary methodology/framework
Testing	Annual basic, triennial TLPT	Iterative ADM maturity assessments
Penalties	Up to 2% global turnover fines	No legal penalties

Scope

DORA

Digital operational resilience in finance

TOGAF

Enterprise architecture across business/IT

Industry

DORA

EU financial sector only

TOGAF

All industries worldwide

Nature

DORA

Mandatory EU regulation

TOGAF

Voluntary methodology/framework

Testing

DORA

Annual basic, triennial TLPT

TOGAF

Iterative ADM maturity assessments

Penalties

DORA

Up to 2% global turnover fines

TOGAF

No legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about DORA and TOGAF

DORA FAQ

TOGAF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COPPA vs GRI

Explore COPPA vs GRI: Child privacy law meets sustainability standards. Key diffs, FTC fines ($170M YouTube), OHS metrics, compliance tips for apps & reports. Act now!

LEED vs NERC CIP

Discover LEED vs NERC CIP: Green building certification meets grid cybersecurity standards. Unlock strategies, pitfalls, implementation frameworks, and ROI for resilient energy ops. Dive in!

RoHS vs GRI

Compare RoHS vs GRI: EU rules restricting 10 hazardous substances in electronics vs global sustainability reporting standards for HES impacts. Master compliance strategies now. (152 characters)

DORA

TOGAF

Quick Verdict

DORA

Key Features

TOGAF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

DORA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

TOGAF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

DORA FAQ

What is the primary objective of DORA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with DORA?

Does DORA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for DORA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with DORA?

Can DORA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing DORA?

TOGAF FAQ

What is the primary objective of TOGAF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with TOGAF?

Does TOGAF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for TOGAF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with TOGAF?

Can TOGAF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing TOGAF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COPPA vs GRI

LEED vs NERC CIP

RoHS vs GRI