Standards Comparison

    EMAS

    Voluntary
    1993

    EU voluntary scheme for environmental management and audit

    VS

    CIS Controls

    Voluntary
    2021

    Prioritized cybersecurity controls framework for cyber resilience.

    Quick Verdict

    EMAS drives voluntary environmental performance via verified reporting for EU organizations, while CIS Controls provide prioritized cybersecurity hygiene worldwide. Companies adopt EMAS for eco-credibility and efficiency; CIS for breach prevention and compliance mapping.

    Environmental Management

    EMAS

    Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 (EMAS III)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory validated public environmental statement
    • Verified legal compliance with environmental laws
    • Demonstrable continuous environmental performance improvement
    • Core indicators across six environmental areas
    • Independent verification by accredited environmental verifiers
    Cybersecurity

    CIS Controls

    CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
    • Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
    • Offense-informed from real attack data
    • Mappings to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS
    • Free Benchmarks and tools for automation

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    EMAS Details

    What It Is

    EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme), established by Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 (EMAS III), is a voluntary EU environmental management framework. It promotes continuous improvement in environmental performance through structured systems, evaluation, and transparent reporting. EMAS uses a PDCA cycle enhanced with verified compliance and public disclosure.

    Key Components

    • Initial environmental review covering direct/indirect aspects
    • EMS aligned to ISO 14001 plus EMAS specifics
    • Six core performance indicators (energy, materials, water, waste, biodiversity, emissions)
    • Internal audits, management review, public environmental statement
    • Independent verification by accredited verifiers and registration with Competent Bodies

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Demonstrates verified legal compliance, reducing regulatory risks
    • Drives resource efficiency and cost savings
    • Enhances credibility for procurement, ESG reporting, stakeholder trust
    • Supports CSRD/ESRS synergies and competitive differentiation

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: review, policy/programme, EMS rollout, audits, verification, registration. Applies to all sectors/sizes; SMEs have derogations. Requires annual validated statements and periodic renewal.

    CIS Controls Details

    What It Is

    CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1 is a community-driven cybersecurity framework of prioritized, actionable best practices. It focuses on reducing cyber risk through 18 controls and 153 safeguards, using an offense-informed, risk-based approach scalable via Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3).

    Key Components

    • 18 Controls covering asset inventory, data protection, access management, vulnerability management, monitoring, and incident response.
    • 153 Safeguards grouped into IG1 (56 essentials), IG2, IG3 for maturity scaling.
    • Built on real-world attack data; maps to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS.
    • No formal certification; self-assessed compliance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates 85% of common attacks, cuts breach costs, accelerates compliance.
    • Builds resilience, efficiency, market trust; supports insurance discounts.
    • Voluntary but referenced in regulations for 'reasonable security'.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: governance, gap analysis, IG1 execution, expansion, validation.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; tools like Benchmarks, Navigator aid.
    • Involves automation, metrics, cross-functional teams; 12-18 months typical.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    EMAS
    Environmental management, performance, reporting
    CIS Controls
    Cybersecurity best practices, asset protection

    Industry

    EMAS
    All EU sectors, voluntary environmental focus
    CIS Controls
    All industries worldwide, cybersecurity focus

    Nature

    EMAS
    Voluntary EU regulation, certification scheme
    CIS Controls
    Voluntary prioritized cybersecurity framework

    Testing

    EMAS
    Independent verifier audits, annual validation
    CIS Controls
    Self-assessment, maturity testing, pen testing

    Penalties

    EMAS
    Registration suspension or deletion
    CIS Controls
    No formal penalties, risk of breaches

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about EMAS and CIS Controls

    EMAS FAQ

    CIS Controls FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages