Standards Comparison

    ENERGY STAR

    Voluntary
    1992

    U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security capability.

    Quick Verdict

    ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings across US markets, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security governance for Australian financial entities. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for cost savings and branding; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance and cyber resilience.

    Energy Efficiency

    ENERGY STAR

    U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory third-party certification and verification testing
    • Performance thresholds exceeding federal minimum standards
    • Standardized DOE test procedures across categories
    • Portfolio Manager benchmarking for buildings and plants
    • Strict brand governance and mark usage rules
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
    • Systematic independent testing and assurance
    • 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
    • Third-party and group-wide obligations

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ENERGY STAR Details

    What It Is

    ENERGY STAR is a U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program established in 1992. It sets category-specific performance thresholds for products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants, using standardized DOE test procedures and a 75+ ENERGY STAR score for certification.

    Key Components

    • Performance thresholds above federal minima (e.g., 15% better for refrigerators)
    • Third-party certification by EPA-recognized labs and bodies
    • Post-market verification testing (5-20% annually)
    • Portfolio Manager for benchmarking
    • Strict brand governance via Brand Book

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since inception), emissions (4B tons avoided), unlocks rebates/procurement advantages, builds consumer trust (90% recognition), supports ESG goals and regulatory compliance like benchmarking laws.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: assess gaps, test/certify products or benchmark buildings, deploy with labeling, maintain via verification. Applies to manufacturers, builders, facility managers across U.S.; requires ongoing data reporting and audits. (178 words)

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, proportionality, and assurance.

    Key Components

    • **Governance and accountabilityBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles.
    • **Core requirementsAsset classification, commensurate controls, systematic testing, incident response, third-party oversight.
    • No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes with internal audit assurance.
    • Compliance via evidence of testing, remediation, and 72-hour/10-day APRA notifications.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid enforcement.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces incident impacts, builds trust.
    • Strategic benefits: competitive edge, better vendor terms, cost avoidance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset register, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes in APRA sectors (Australia); requires ongoing assurance, no formal certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ENERGY STAR
    Energy efficiency in products, buildings, plants
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security, cyber resilience for assets

    Industry

    ENERGY STAR
    All sectors, consumer/commercial, US-focused
    APRA CPS 234
    Financial services (banks, insurers), Australia-only

    Nature

    ENERGY STAR
    Voluntary certification, labeling program
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential standard, enforceable regulation

    Testing

    ENERGY STAR
    Third-party lab tests, post-market verification
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent testing, annual reviews

    Penalties

    ENERGY STAR
    Delisting, loss of certification/label
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, fines, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ENERGY STAR and APRA CPS 234

    ENERGY STAR FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages