ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security capability.
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings across US markets, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security governance for Australian financial entities. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for cost savings and branding; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance and cyber resilience.
ENERGY STAR
U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and verification testing
- Performance thresholds exceeding federal minimum standards
- Standardized DOE test procedures across categories
- Portfolio Manager benchmarking for buildings and plants
- Strict brand governance and mark usage rules
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
- Systematic independent testing and assurance
- 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
- Third-party and group-wide obligations
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is a U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program established in 1992. It sets category-specific performance thresholds for products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants, using standardized DOE test procedures and a 75+ ENERGY STAR score for certification.
Key Components
- Performance thresholds above federal minima (e.g., 15% better for refrigerators)
- Third-party certification by EPA-recognized labs and bodies
- Post-market verification testing (5-20% annually)
- Portfolio Manager for benchmarking
- Strict brand governance via Brand Book
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since inception), emissions (4B tons avoided), unlocks rebates/procurement advantages, builds consumer trust (90% recognition), supports ESG goals and regulatory compliance like benchmarking laws.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: assess gaps, test/certify products or benchmark buildings, deploy with labeling, maintain via verification. Applies to manufacturers, builders, facility managers across U.S.; requires ongoing data reporting and audits. (178 words)
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, proportionality, and assurance.
Key Components
- **Governance and accountabilityBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles.
- **Core requirementsAsset classification, commensurate controls, systematic testing, incident response, third-party oversight.
- No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes with internal audit assurance.
- Compliance via evidence of testing, remediation, and 72-hour/10-day APRA notifications.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid enforcement.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident impacts, builds trust.
- Strategic benefits: competitive edge, better vendor terms, cost avoidance.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset register, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes in APRA sectors (Australia); requires ongoing assurance, no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency in products, buildings, plants | Information security, cyber resilience for assets |
| Industry | All sectors, consumer/commercial, US-focused | Financial services (banks, insurers), Australia-only |
| Nature | Voluntary certification, labeling program | Mandatory prudential standard, enforceable regulation |
| Testing | Third-party lab tests, post-market verification | Systematic independent testing, annual reviews |
| Penalties | Delisting, loss of certification/label | Regulatory sanctions, fines, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and APRA CPS 234
ENERGY STAR FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)
Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
LEED vs NERC CIP
Discover LEED vs NERC CIP: Green building certification meets grid cybersecurity standards. Unlock strategies, pitfalls, implementation frameworks, and ROI for resilient energy ops. Dive in!
K-PIPA vs PIPEDA
Compare K-PIPA vs PIPEDA: South Korea's consent-heavy regime vs Canada's 10 principles. Unlock compliance strategies, breach rules & global tips. Navigate risks now!
BRC vs ISO 56002
Compare BRC vs ISO 56002: Food safety certification meets innovation management. Key differences, structures, benefits & implementation for compliance, quality & growth. Dive in now!