ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings
AS9100
International standard for aerospace quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR certifies energy-efficient products and buildings via voluntary benchmarking and testing, slashing costs and emissions. AS9100 mandates rigorous quality systems for aerospace firms, ensuring safety and traceability. Companies adopt them for market access, compliance, and performance gains.
ENERGY STAR
U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and ongoing verification testing
- Category-specific efficiency thresholds above federal minima
- Portfolio Manager tool for building benchmarking and scores
- Strict brand governance with controlled label usage
- Proven 5 trillion kWh savings since 1992 inception
AS9100
AS9100D Quality Management Systems for Aerospace
Key Features
- Configuration management for product integrity
- Product safety lifecycle controls
- Counterfeit parts prevention processes
- Operational risk management in Clause 8
- Enhanced supplier and sub-tier controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is the U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program for energy efficiency. It sets category-specific performance specifications for products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants, using standardized DOE test procedures and third-party verification to signal superior efficiency.
Key Components
- Performance thresholds (e.g., 15% above federal minima for appliances; 75+ score for buildings)
- Third-party certification via EPA-recognized labs and bodies
- Ongoing verification testing (5-20% annually per category)
- Portfolio Manager for benchmarking; brand governance rules Certification model requires partner agreements, data submission via QPX, and mark usage compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives $500B+ cost savings, 4B metric tons GHG avoided; unlocks rebates, procurement prefs. Builds trust via credible label (90% recognition); manages risks of delisting/misuse. Enhances ESG, market differentiation.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess/gap analysis, design/testing/certification, deployment, ongoing verification. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners across U.S./Canada; annual building recertification via licensed professionals. Involves lab testing, MESA enrollment, shipment reporting.
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based, process-oriented approach to ensure product safety and supply chain integrity.
Key Components
- 10-clause Annex SL structure covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1).
- Built on PDCA cycle; requires third-party certification via IAQG-accredited auditors.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandated by OEMs for market access and supplier qualification.
- Reduces defects, improves delivery, mitigates safety risks.
- Enhances reputation via OASIS database visibility; drives cost savings and competitiveness.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification.
- Applies to all sizes in ASD; 6-18 months typical; annual surveillance audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | AS9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency in products, buildings, plants | Quality management for aerospace design, production |
| Industry | All sectors, consumer/commercial, US-focused | Aviation, space, defense supply chains, global |
| Nature | Voluntary labeling/benchmarking program | Certification standard building on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Third-party lab tests, post-market verification | Stage audits, surveillance, internal audits |
| Penalties | Delisting, label revocation, no legal fines | Certification suspension, market access loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and AS9100
ENERGY STAR FAQ
AS9100 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 2 Implementation Guide for Small DIB Contractors: First 5 Steps to C3PAO Certification with Infographic
Actionable CMMC Level 2 guide for small DIB contractors: 5-step roadmap to C3PAO certification with infographic on timelines, costs & POA&Ms. Achieve DoD compli

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 41001 vs ISO 30301
Unlock ISO 41001 vs ISO 30301: Compare FM systems for strategic facilities with records management for compliance. Align for efficiency, risk control & sustainability. Explore now!
HITRUST CSF vs BRC
Compare HITRUST CSF vs BRC: certifiable cybersecurity framework meets food safety standard. Uncover differences in controls, scoping & benefits for compliance. Choose wisely now!
FISMA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11
Unlock FISMA vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Federal cybersecurity (NIST RMF) meets electronic records validation. Key differences, strategies, pitfalls for agencies & life sciences compliance.