Standards Comparison

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

    VS

    BRC

    Voluntary
    2022

    GFSI-benchmarked global standard for food safety certification

    Quick Verdict

    HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable cybersecurity assurance for healthcare and regulated industries via maturity-scored assessments, while BRC provides GFSI-benchmarked food safety certification for manufacturers through rigorous on-site audits. Organizations adopt them for trusted third-party validation and market access.

    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ frameworks for assess-once-report-many
    • Risk-based tailoring via structured organizational factors
    • Five-level maturity model from policy to managed
    • MyCSF platform for automated scoping and evidence
    • Tiered certifications e1/i1/r2 with inheritance support
    Food Safety

    BRC

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Codex HACCP-based food safety plan
    • Senior management commitment fundamentals
    • Environmental monitoring and risk zoning
    • GFSI-benchmarked retailer certification
    • Unannounced audits for culture verification

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It uses a risk-based approach with structured tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors for scalable assurance.

    Key Components

    • 19 assessment domains covering governance, technical controls, and resilience.
    • Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, ~49 objectives, ~156 specifications.
    • **Five-level maturity modelPolicy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed.
    • **Tiered certificationse1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year).
    • MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, and remediation.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Rationalizes multi-regulatory compliance (assess once, report many).
    • Provides credible third-party assurance via centralized HITRUST review.
    • Reduces breach risk (99.4% certified breach-free) and TPRM costs.
    • Enables market differentiation, insurance savings, faster sales in healthcare/finance.

    Implementation Overview

    Multi-phase: scoping/gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment by Authorized Assessors. Applies to regulated industries handling sensitive data; requires evidence of operational maturity. Involves MyCSF, inheritance from clouds, CAPs; 6-18 months typical.

    BRC Details

    What It Is

    The BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked third-party certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, packers, and related supply-chain activities. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality via a structured management system emphasizing senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based plans, and robust prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).

    Key Components

    Nine core clauses: 1) Senior management commitment, 2) HACCP food safety plan, 3) Quality management system, 4) Site standards, 5) Product control, 6) Process control, 7) Personnel, plus risk zones and traded products. Features fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergens, internal audits) with grading (AA/A/B/C/D) via annual announced/unannounced audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated by retailers for supply-chain access; reduces audits, evidences due diligence, mitigates recalls (allergens, pathogens, labelling). Builds resilience, trust, and market credibility; aligns with FSMA/legislation.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification. Targets food sector globally; 6-12 months typical, requires CAPEX for facilities/training/audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    HITRUST CSF
    Information security/privacy controls across 19 domains
    BRC
    Food safety, quality, legality in manufacturing/processing

    Industry

    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic
    BRC
    Food manufacturing, packaging, storage/distribution

    Nature

    HITRUST CSF
    Voluntary certifiable security framework
    BRC
    GFSI-benchmarked food safety certification standard

    Testing

    HITRUST CSF
    Maturity-scored validated assessments via MyCSF
    BRC
    Annual on-site audits, announced/unannounced

    Penalties

    HITRUST CSF
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties
    BRC
    Certification suspension/denial, market access loss

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about HITRUST CSF and BRC

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    BRC FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages