ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program certifying energy-efficient products and buildings
EN 1090
EU standard for steel and aluminium structural execution
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings via benchmarking and testing, saving costs and emissions. EN 1090 mandates CE marking for structural steel/aluminium via Factory Production Control, ensuring safety and market access.
ENERGY STAR
EPA ENERGY STAR Certification Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification by EPA-recognized bodies
- Ongoing post-market verification testing of 5-20% models
- Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums
- Standardized DOE test procedures for consistent metrics
- Portfolio Manager benchmarking with 75+ score certification
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes EXC1-EXC4
- Factory Production Control FPC certification
- CE marking and Declaration of Performance
- Welding quality aligned with ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT inspection
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is the U.S. EPA's voluntary labeling and certification program for superior energy efficiency. It covers products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants using performance thresholds, standardized testing, and third-party verification to signal top-tier efficiency.
Key Components
- Category-specific specs (e.g., 15%+ above federal minimums, EER/IEER/COP metrics)
- DOE test procedures (10 CFR codified)
- Third-party labs, certification bodies, QPX reporting
- Post-market verification (5-20% annually)
- Portfolio Manager for 1-100 building scores (75+ threshold)
- Brand governance via Brand Book Certification requires annual renewal for buildings/plants.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives $500B+ savings, 4B tons GHG avoided; unlocks rebates, procurement prefs. Builds trust (90% recognition), reduces costs/emissions, enhances ESG/reputation. Voluntary yet de facto standard via policies/utilities.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess/gap analysis (4-8wks), design/test/certify (3-12mo), deploy, verify/improve. Applies all sizes/industries (U.S./Canada focus); needs labs/CBs, data governance, ongoing VT. Third-party verification mandatory for certification.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is the harmonized European standard (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) for execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components and kits under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). It employs a risk-based approach via Execution Classes (EXC1-4) to ensure safe fabrication, assembly, and market placement with CE marking.
Key Components
- **Factory Production Control (FPC)Certified system for process control, traceability, and inspections.
- **Technical requirementsMaterials, welding (aligned with ISO 3834), tolerances, corrosion protection, NDT.
- **AVCP systemsNotified Body certification, Initial Type Testing/Calculation (ITT/ITC), Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **Risk scalingLinks consequence, service, and production categories to EXC requirements.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for EU/EEA market access and CE marking.
- Mitigates liability, ensures quality consistency.
- Enables high-risk projects, builds stakeholder trust.
- Drives operational maturity, competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC development, personnel/welding qualification, NB audits. Targets fabricators in construction; 6-12 months typical, with ongoing surveillance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency labeling, benchmarking for products, buildings, plants | Execution, conformity of steel/aluminium structural components |
| Industry | All sectors, products, buildings; US-focused, global recognition | Construction, fabrication; EU/EEA mandatory for structural metals |
| Nature | Voluntary certification program with third-party verification | Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking under CPR |
| Testing | Third-party lab testing, post-market verification (5-20% annually) | Factory Production Control certification, initial audits, surveillance |
| Penalties | Delisting, loss of label use, no legal fines | Market exclusion, fines, certificate suspension, legal liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and EN 1090
ENERGY STAR FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates
Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)
Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 17025 vs ISO 21001
Discover ISO 17025 vs ISO 21001: Lab testing competence meets educational management systems. Compare structures, risks & benefits for accreditation. Boost compliance now!
PMBOK vs EMAS
Compare PMBOK vs EMAS: Project governance powerhouse meets elite environmental standard. Key differences in compliance, strategy & implementation revealed. Optimize now!
FISMA vs ISO 26000
Compare FISMA vs ISO 26000: Mandatory US cybersecurity law meets voluntary global SR guidance. Master compliance, risk strategies & implementation for resilient ops. Explore now!