Standards Comparison

    ENERGY STAR

    Voluntary
    1992

    U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings

    VS

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    Mandatory
    1997

    FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records and signatures

    Quick Verdict

    ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings to cut costs and emissions, while FDA 21 CFR Part 11 mandates controls for electronic records in life sciences to ensure data integrity and regulatory compliance.

    Energy Efficiency

    ENERGY STAR

    U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory third-party certification and verification testing
    • Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minima
    • Standardized DOE test procedures for consistent measurement
    • Strict brand governance and mark usage controls
    • Portfolio Manager benchmarking for buildings and plants
    Electronic Records

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Secure, time-stamped audit trails for changes
    • Electronic signatures equivalent to handwritten
    • Validation ensuring system accuracy and reliability
    • Access controls for authorized users only
    • Controls for closed and open systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ENERGY STAR Details

    What It Is

    ENERGY STAR is a U.S. government-backed voluntary labeling and benchmarking program administered by the EPA with DOE technical support. Launched in 1992, it promotes superior energy efficiency across products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants through performance thresholds, standardized testing, and certification.

    Key Components

    • Category-specific efficiency metrics (e.g., EER/IEER for HVAC, AFUE for furnaces)
    • Over 65 product categories with 80,000+ certified models
    • Portfolio Manager for building scores (75+ threshold)
    • Third-party certification via EPA-recognized labs/CBs and ongoing verification (5-20% annually)
    • Rigorous brand governance via Brand Book

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since inception), emissions (4B tons avoided), unlocks rebates/procurement advantages, enhances reputation (90% consumer recognition), supports ESG goals and regulatory benchmarking.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: assess gaps, test/certify products or benchmark buildings, deploy with labeling compliance, maintain via verification/training. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners across U.S./Canada; annual PE/RA verification for buildings.

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details

    What It Is

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. federal regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate-rule-required records, employing a risk-based approach clarified in 2003 guidance, with enforcement discretion on some elements like validation.

    Key Components

    • Subparts A-C cover scope, electronic records controls (§11.10 closed systems, §11.30 open systems), and signatures (§§11.50-11.300).
    • Core controls: validation, audit trails, access limits, operational/authority/device checks, training, accountability policies, signature linking/uniqueness.
    • Built on ALCOA+ principles; no formal certification, but compliance via validation and inspection readiness.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for FDA compliance in pharma, devices, biotech to avoid enforcement actions.
    • Enhances data integrity, reduces risks, enables digital transformation, builds stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, gap analysis, validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), SOPs/training, ongoing monitoring.
    • Targets life sciences; risk-based for all sizes; audited during FDA inspections.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ENERGY STAR
    Energy efficiency for products, buildings, plants
    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness

    Industry

    ENERGY STAR
    All sectors, consumer/commercial, US-focused
    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Life sciences, pharma, devices, US-regulated

    Nature

    ENERGY STAR
    Voluntary labeling/benchmarking program
    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Mandatory regulation for electronic records

    Testing

    ENERGY STAR
    Third-party labs, post-market verification
    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    System validation, IQ/OQ/PQ, audit trails

    Penalties

    ENERGY STAR
    Delisting, no label use
    FDA 21 CFR Part 11
    Warning letters, fines, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ENERGY STAR and FDA 21 CFR Part 11

    ENERGY STAR FAQ

    FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages