ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy efficiency certification
FISMA
U.S. law mandating risk-based federal cybersecurity programs
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings via third-party testing, while FISMA mandates risk-based cybersecurity for federal systems through continuous monitoring. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for cost savings and branding; FISMA for contract eligibility and compliance.
ENERGY STAR
U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and verification testing
- Category-specific performance thresholds above federal standards
- Portfolio Manager for building energy benchmarking
- Strict brand governance and mark usage rules
- Proven 5 trillion kWh cumulative energy savings
FISMA
Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)
Key Features
- NIST RMF 7-step risk management lifecycle
- Continuous monitoring and diagnostics mandate
- Annual independent IG maturity assessments
- FIPS 199 impact-based system categorization
- Real-time major incident reporting requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is the U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program for superior energy efficiency. It covers products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants using category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums, standardized DOE test procedures, and a score-based methodology (e.g., 75+ for certification).
Key Components
- Performance thresholds (e.g., EER/IEER for HVAC, AFUE for furnaces)
- Third-party certification by EPA-recognized labs/CBs
- Post-market verification (5-20% annually)
- Portfolio Manager for building scores
- Brand governance via controlled marks Certification requires ongoing compliance and annual verification for buildings.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since 1992), emissions (4B tons avoided), unlocks rebates/procurement. Builds trust via verified claims, supports ESG, differentiates in markets. Voluntary yet de facto standard for incentives.
Implementation Overview
Assess via Portfolio Manager, test/design to specs, certify via CBs, maintain via verification/shipments. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners across sizes/industries in U.S./Canada. Involves labs, audits, continuous data reporting.
FISMA Details
What It Is
The Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is a U.S. federal law providing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. Enacted in 2002 and updated in 2014, it mandates agency-wide security programs using the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Key Components
- NIST RMF 7 steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor
- NIST SP 800-53 controls (1,000+), baselines via SP 800-53B, FIPS 199 categorization
- System Security Plans (SSPs), POA&Ms, continuous monitoring (SP 800-137)
- Oversight by OMB, CISA, annual IG evaluations with maturity models
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal agencies and contractors handling federal data
- Reduces risks, ensures resilience, meets reporting/incident obligations
- Enables contracts, builds trust, aligns security with missions
- Provides strategic efficiency and competitive market access
Implementation Overview
Phased RMF across inventories/portfolios; gap analysis, control deployment, assessments. Applies to agencies, contractors, all sizes; requires ongoing audits, no central certification. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | FISMA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency in products, buildings, plants | Information security for federal systems, data |
| Industry | All sectors, consumer/commercial products, US-focused | Federal agencies, contractors, US government systems |
| Nature | Voluntary labeling/benchmarking program | Mandatory federal law with oversight, reporting |
| Testing | Third-party certification, post-market verification | Continuous monitoring, RMF assessments, IG audits |
| Penalties | Delisting, label revocation, no legal fines | Contract loss, debarment, funding cuts, IG reports |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and FISMA
ENERGY STAR FAQ
FISMA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass
Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs
Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PCI DSS vs AS9120B
Compare PCI DSS vs AS9120B: Decode payment security vs aerospace quality standards. Uncover key differences, compliance benefits, and pick the ideal framework for your operations now.
CMMC vs UAE PDPL
Compare CMMC vs UAE PDPL: Decode DoD cybersecurity tiers (NIST 800-171) & UAE data privacy rules. Master compliance for defense & global ops. Key insights await!
ISO 37301 vs ISO 14064
Compare ISO 37301 vs ISO 14064: Certifiable CMS meets GHG standards. Integrate for risk-based compliance, emissions tracking & sustainability gains. Discover key differences now!