ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program certifying energy-efficient products and buildings
ISO 28000
International standard for supply chain security management systems.
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives energy efficiency certification for products and buildings via benchmarking and testing, while ISO 28000 establishes security management systems for supply chains. Companies adopt ENERGY STAR for cost savings and recognition; ISO 28000 for risk reduction and resilience.
ENERGY STAR
EPA ENERGY STAR Certification Program
Key Features
- Third-party certification with mandatory ongoing verification testing
- Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums
- Standardized DOE test procedures for repeatable measurements
- Strict brand governance controlling label and mark usage
- Portfolio Manager benchmarking for buildings scoring 75+
ISO 28000
ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems Requirements
Key Features
- Risk-based supply chain security management framework
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement and resilience
- Leadership commitment with top management accountability
- Supplier interdependency and third-party governance
- Integration with ISO 9001, 22301, and 27001 standards
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is a U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program established in 1992, partnered with DOE. It promotes superior energy efficiency across products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants through category-specific performance specifications and rigorous verification.
Key Components
- Performance thresholds exceeding federal minimums (e.g., 15% better for refrigerators).
- Standardized DOE test procedures.
- Mandatory third-party certification via recognized labs and bodies.
- Ongoing post-market verification (5-20% annual testing).
- Portfolio Manager for 1-100 building scores (75+ for certification).
- Strict brand governance via Brand Book.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives $500B+ savings, 4B tons GHG avoided; unlocks rebates, procurement edges, ESG credibility. Builds consumer trust (90% recognition), reduces costs, enhances reputation amid regulations.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess gaps, test/certify products or benchmark buildings, deploy with labeling compliance, verify annually. Applies to manufacturers, builders, owners across sizes/industries; third-party audits required for certification.
ISO 28000 Details
What It Is
ISO 28000:2022 — Security and resilience — Security management systems — Requirements is an international certification standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a security management system (SMS). It adopts a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach to protect supply chains from threats like theft, sabotage, and disruptions.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Focuses on risk assessment, controls (physical, procedural, technical), incident response, and supplier governance.
- Aligns with ISO High Level Structure for integration; no fixed control count—proportionate to risks.
- Optional third-party certification via accredited bodies per ISO 28003.
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces incident costs, insurance premiums, and disruptions.
- Meets contractual/regulatory demands (e.g., C-TPAT equivalents).
- Enhances resilience, market access, trade facilitation, and stakeholder trust.
- Provides competitive edge in logistics, manufacturing, pharma.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, gap analysis, risk assessment, deployment, audits.
- Scalable for SMEs to multinationals; 6-36 months typical.
- Involves mapping, training, KPIs, internal audits, management reviews.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | ISO 28000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency in products, buildings, plants | Supply chain security management system |
| Industry | All sectors, U.S.-focused, any size | Logistics, manufacturing, global, any size |
| Nature | Voluntary labeling/benchmarking program | Voluntary management system standard |
| Testing | Third-party lab tests, verification 5-20% | Internal audits, management reviews, certification |
| Penalties | Delisting, label removal, no fines | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and ISO 28000
ENERGY STAR FAQ
ISO 28000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs
Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 17025 vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare ISO 17025 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Decode lab competence standards against NY cybersecurity regs for regulated finance. Gain compliance edge—read now!
CE Marking vs CMMC
CE Marking vs CMMC: EU product safety declaration meets DoD cybersecurity tiers. Compare requirements, processes & strategies for global market access success.
EMAS vs J-SOX
EMAS vs J-SOX: EU's voluntary eco-management scheme for performance & transparency vs Japan's ICFR regime for financial reliability. Compare compliance, benefits & strategy now!