Standards Comparison

    ENERGY STAR

    Voluntary
    1992

    U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings

    VS

    SAMA CSF

    Mandatory
    2017

    Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity maturity

    Quick Verdict

    ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings to cut costs and emissions, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms to ensure resilience against threats. Organizations adopt ENERGY STAR for market edge; SAMA CSF for regulatory survival.

    Energy Efficiency

    ENERGY STAR

    U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory third-party certification and verification testing
    • Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums
    • Standardized DOE test procedures across products
    • Portfolio Manager benchmarking for 75+ building scores
    • Strict brand governance and mark usage rules
    Cybersecurity

    SAMA CSF

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
    • Four core domains with detailed subdomains
    • Board-level governance and CISO requirements
    • Third-party risk management mandates
    • Principle-based controls aligned with NIST/ISO

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ENERGY STAR Details

    What It Is

    ENERGY STAR is a U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program established in 1992. It sets superior energy efficiency standards for products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants. The core approach uses category-specific performance thresholds, standardized testing, and independent verification to signal top-tier efficiency.

    Key Components

    • Performance thresholds (e.g., 15% above federal minimums for appliances)
    • Third-party certification via EPA-recognized labs and bodies
    • Post-market verification testing (5-20% of models annually)
    • Portfolio Manager tool for 1-100 building scores (75+ for certification)
    • Brand governance with strict mark usage rules Certification requires ongoing compliance and annual building verification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since inception), emissions (4B tons avoided), and unlocks rebates/procurement advantages. Builds consumer trust (90% recognition), enhances reputation, and supports ESG goals despite being voluntary.

    Implementation Overview

    Involves partnership agreement, lab testing, certification submission via QPX, and continuous verification. Applies to manufacturers, builders, and facility managers across sizes/industries in U.S./Canada. Requires third-party audits; phased approach: assess, test/certify, deploy, monitor.

    SAMA CSF Details

    What It Is

    The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF), Version 1.0 (May 2017), is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented blueprint to govern cybersecurity, focusing on detecting, resisting, responding to, and recovering from threats across information assets. Its risk-based approach emphasizes maturity progression through self-assessments and audits.

    Key Components

    • Four main domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
    • Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
    • Built on NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; features a six-level maturity model (Level 3 minimum: structured policies/standards/procedures, KPIs).
    • Compliance via periodic self-assessments and SAMA reviews, no external certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for banks, insurers, finance firms to avoid penalties, audits, operational disruptions.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces incident impacts, supports Vision 2030 digital growth.
    • Builds trust with regulators, customers, partners; enables competitive differentiation via higher maturity (Levels 4-5).

    Implementation Overview

    Phased roadmap: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, control design/deployment, operations/monitoring, audits/improvement. Applies to all sizes of SAMA entities in Saudi Arabia; requires board sponsorship, GRC tools, training.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ENERGY STAR
    Energy efficiency across products, buildings, plants
    SAMA CSF
    Cybersecurity across governance, risk, operations, third-parties

    Industry

    ENERGY STAR
    All sectors, US-focused, voluntary global use
    SAMA CSF
    Saudi financial institutions only, mandatory

    Nature

    ENERGY STAR
    Voluntary certification program
    SAMA CSF
    Mandatory regulatory framework

    Testing

    ENERGY STAR
    Third-party labs, post-market verification, annual building scores
    SAMA CSF
    Self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity model reviews

    Penalties

    ENERGY STAR
    Delisting, label revocation, no fines
    SAMA CSF
    Fines, supervisory actions, license risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ENERGY STAR and SAMA CSF

    ENERGY STAR FAQ

    SAMA CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages