ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings
SAMA CSF
Saudi framework for financial sector cybersecurity maturity
Quick Verdict
ENERGY STAR drives voluntary energy efficiency certification for products and buildings to cut costs and emissions, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms to ensure resilience against threats. Organizations adopt ENERGY STAR for market edge; SAMA CSF for regulatory survival.
ENERGY STAR
U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and verification testing
- Category-specific performance thresholds above federal minimums
- Standardized DOE test procedures across products
- Portfolio Manager benchmarking for 75+ building scores
- Strict brand governance and mark usage rules
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level maturity model targeting Level 3 minimum
- Four core domains with detailed subdomains
- Board-level governance and CISO requirements
- Third-party risk management mandates
- Principle-based controls aligned with NIST/ISO
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is a U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program established in 1992. It sets superior energy efficiency standards for products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants. The core approach uses category-specific performance thresholds, standardized testing, and independent verification to signal top-tier efficiency.
Key Components
- Performance thresholds (e.g., 15% above federal minimums for appliances)
- Third-party certification via EPA-recognized labs and bodies
- Post-market verification testing (5-20% of models annually)
- Portfolio Manager tool for 1-100 building scores (75+ for certification)
- Brand governance with strict mark usage rules Certification requires ongoing compliance and annual building verification.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since inception), emissions (4B tons avoided), and unlocks rebates/procurement advantages. Builds consumer trust (90% recognition), enhances reputation, and supports ESG goals despite being voluntary.
Implementation Overview
Involves partnership agreement, lab testing, certification submission via QPX, and continuous verification. Applies to manufacturers, builders, and facility managers across sizes/industries in U.S./Canada. Requires third-party audits; phased approach: assess, test/certify, deploy, monitor.
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
The Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF), Version 1.0 (May 2017), is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented blueprint to govern cybersecurity, focusing on detecting, resisting, responding to, and recovering from threats across information assets. Its risk-based approach emphasizes maturity progression through self-assessments and audits.
Key Components
- Four main domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
- Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
- Built on NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; features a six-level maturity model (Level 3 minimum: structured policies/standards/procedures, KPIs).
- Compliance via periodic self-assessments and SAMA reviews, no external certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for banks, insurers, finance firms to avoid penalties, audits, operational disruptions.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident impacts, supports Vision 2030 digital growth.
- Builds trust with regulators, customers, partners; enables competitive differentiation via higher maturity (Levels 4-5).
Implementation Overview
Phased roadmap: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, control design/deployment, operations/monitoring, audits/improvement. Applies to all sizes of SAMA entities in Saudi Arabia; requires board sponsorship, GRC tools, training.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ENERGY STAR | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Energy efficiency across products, buildings, plants | Cybersecurity across governance, risk, operations, third-parties |
| Industry | All sectors, US-focused, voluntary global use | Saudi financial institutions only, mandatory |
| Nature | Voluntary certification program | Mandatory regulatory framework |
| Testing | Third-party labs, post-market verification, annual building scores | Self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity model reviews |
| Penalties | Delisting, label revocation, no fines | Fines, supervisory actions, license risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ENERGY STAR and SAMA CSF
ENERGY STAR FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
OSHA vs ISO 19600
Discover OSHA vs ISO 19600: U.S. safety standards meet global CMS guidelines. Unlock strategies to integrate OSHA enforcement with ISO risk management for resilient compliance. Elevate your governance now!
PCI DSS vs IFS Food
PCI DSS vs IFS Food: Compare payment security standards with food safety protocols. Uncover key requirements, compliance strategies, and differences for risk management. Read now!
AS9110C vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare AS9110C vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Key differences in aerospace QMS for MROs vs public disclosure mandates. Uncover gaps, synergies, compliance roadmap. Secure your edge now!