What is the primary objective of **EPA**?

**The primary objective of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is to protect human health and the environment by enforcing federal statutes like the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).** These implement standards codified in **40 CFR**, including NAAQS for air, effluent guidelines for water discharges via NPDES permits, and hazardous waste controls for TSDFs, ensuring clean air, water, and land through performance limits, monitoring, and enforcement.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **EPA**?

**Entities discharging pollutants, emitting air contaminants, or managing hazardous waste are legally required to comply with EPA standards under CAA, CWA, and RCRA.** This includes major sources (e.g., ≥10 tpy single HAP or ≥25 tpy combined under CAA §112), NPDES point source dischargers, RCRA generators (e.g., LQGs accumulating >1,000 kg/month), and TSDF operators; states implement via SIPs/permits with EPA oversight.

Does **EPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**EPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for most standards, relying instead on self-monitoring, DMRs, and EPA/state inspections.** RCRA TSDF protocols guide voluntary audits eligible for penalty mitigation under 1995 Audit Policy; Title V and NPDES emphasize permit compliance via records, with e-reporting (eRule) enabling ECHO verification—no ISO-like certification required.

How often should an assessment for **EPA** be performed?

**EPA assessments via self-audits and inspections should occur at least annually, aligned with permit/reporting cycles like semiannual RCRA Subpart AA/BB/CC monitoring and daily LDAR checks.** NPDES requires ongoing DMRs; RCRA mandates 3-year record retention with periodic reviews; biennial RCRA reports for LQGs ensure continuous compliance verification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **EPA**?

**Non-compliance with EPA standards triggers civil penalties (strict liability, e.g., economic benefit recovery), injunctive relief, and criminal charges for knowing violations.** Cases like Hino Motors ($1.6B CAA fraud) show multi-million fines; RCRA violations (e.g., Stericycle) incur per-day penalties; ECHO data drives enforcement, with citizen suits amplifying exposure.

An **EPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, EPA standards cannot be directly mapped to other international frameworks in this FAQ, as they are U.S.-specific under 40 CFR implementing CAA/CWA/RCRA.** Focus remains on federal baselines, state SIPs/NPDES, and permit-specific obligations without cross-references.

What is the first step to begin implementing **EPA**?

**The first step to implement EPA compliance is conducting a baseline audit using EPA protocols (e.g., RCRA TSDF checklist) to create a regulatory register of statutes, permits, and gaps.** Prioritize high-risk areas like labeling, DMRs, and accumulation limits, followed by quick-win corrections and EMS development.

What is the primary objective of **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The primary objective of MLPS 2.0 is to establish a graded cybersecurity protection system ensuring security controls match the potential harm from system compromise to national security, social order, and public interests.** It classifies information systems into five levels (1-5) based on impact severity, mandating commensurate technical, management, physical, and personnel controls per GB/T 22239-2020 standards. This integrates cybersecurity into national governance, covering all network operators in China via the 2017 Cybersecurity Law Article 21.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**All network operators in mainland China, including domestic firms, foreign-invested enterprises, and multinationals, are legally required to comply with MLPS 2.0.** This encompasses operators of IT systems, cloud platforms, IoT, big data, and industrial controls. Virtually every entity with networks falls under its scope, with critical sectors (e.g., finance, energy) often at Level 3+; enforced by Ministry of Public Security and local PSBs.

Does **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 requires external security reviews by licensed Chinese firms for Level 2+ systems, with PSB approval.** Reviews score compliance (minimum 75/100) across technical, management, and physical domains per GB/T 28448-2019. Level 1 needs self-assessment only; higher levels demand documentation submission and potential on-site inspections.

How often should an assessment for **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be performed?

**Assessments under MLPS 2.0 must occur periodically: biennially for Level 2, annually for Level 3, semi-annually for Level 4, and as mandated for Level 5.** Re-evaluations are also required after major changes (e.g., architecture shifts). Self-inspections are ongoing for all levels, with external audits by licensed firms for Level 2+.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**Non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 results in administrative fines up to 100,000 yuan, operational suspensions, system shutdowns, and intensified PSB inspections.** Enforcement links to business license renewals; severe cases involve blacklisting or criminal liability, as seen in fines exceeding RMB 200 million for data breaches tied to MLPS failures.

An **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 control domains (e.g., governance, physical, technical) map to frameworks like ISO 27001 Annex A and NIST CSF.** Common controls align with organizational/people/physical/technological categories; organizations use Statements of Applicability for gap analysis, though MLPS adds prescriptive grading and PSB oversight.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The first step is conducting a provisional self-assessment to classify systems into Levels 1-5 based on impact to national security, social order, and public interests.** Inventory assets, evaluate harm severity per GB/T 22240-2020, document rationale, then file with local PSB (within 30 days for Level 2+), engaging experts as needed.

EPA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Standards Comparison

EPA

Mandatory

1970

U.S. federal standards for air, water, waste protection

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory

N/A

China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection framework

Quick Verdict

EPA enforces US environmental standards via permits and monitoring for pollution control, while MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity in China. Companies adopt EPA for legal compliance and MLPS for market access and security.

Air Quality

EPA

U.S. EPA Environmental Standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Legally binding regulations codified in 40 CFR Title 40
Facility-specific permits translating national standards
Numeric limits and technology-based performance criteria
Evidence-driven monitoring with QA/QC requirements
Federal-state enforcement with strict liability penalties

Standard

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Five-level impact-based system classification
Mandatory PSB registration for Level 2+ systems
Graded technical and governance controls
Third-party audits with 75/100 pass score
Ongoing re-evaluations and enforcement oversight

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

EPA Details

What It Is

EPA standards are legally enforceable requirements under statutes like Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), codified in 40 CFR Title 40. This regulatory framework implements environmental protection across air, water, and waste media through a systems approach combining national baselines with site-specific obligations.

Key Components

Statutory authority, regulations, permits, monitoring/reporting, enforcement.
Numeric limits (e.g., NAAQS, effluent guidelines), technology-based controls (MACT, NSPS), work practices.
RCRA Subparts AA/BB/CC for hazardous waste air emissions.
Compliance via NPDES/Title V/RCRA permits; no formal certification but mandatory audits/enforcement.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance avoids civil/criminal penalties, operational shutdowns, reputational harm. Enables risk management, ESG alignment, efficiency gains via pollution prevention. Builds stakeholder trust through transparent data (ECHO, ICIS-NPDES).

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, EMS design, controls deployment, training, audits. Applies to regulated industries (manufacturing, energy); multi-state ops need federal-state mapping. Ongoing via PDCA, digital reporting tools.

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

What It Is

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, governance, and organizational controls.

Key Components

Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
Standards like GB/T 22239-2019 (baselines), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
Common controls for all levels plus extended for cloud, IoT, big data.
Compliance via third-party audits (75/100 score minimum) and PSB approval for Level 2+.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for all China-based networks; non-compliance risks fines, suspensions.
Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
Builds regulator trust, enables market access.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing monitoring.
Applies to all sizes in China; higher levels for critical sectors.
Requires local PSB filing, periodic re-evaluations.

Key Differences

Aspect	EPA	MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Scope	Air, water, waste pollution standards	Graded cybersecurity for networks
Industry	All industrial sectors US-wide	All network operators in China
Nature	Mandatory US federal regulations	Mandatory Chinese cybersecurity law
Testing	Self-monitoring, EPA inspections	Third-party audits, PSB approval
Penalties	Civil/criminal fines, shutdowns	Fines, operations suspension