EPA
U.S. federal regulations protecting air, water, waste environments
WELL
Performance-based certification for building occupant health.
Quick Verdict
EPA enforces mandatory environmental regulations for pollution control across industries, while WELL is voluntary certification optimizing building health. Companies adopt EPA for legal compliance, WELL for occupant wellness, productivity, and ESG differentiation.
EPA
U.S. EPA Standards (40 CFR Title 40)
Key Features
- Multi-layered architecture: statutes, 40 CFR, permits, enforcement
- Evidence-driven systems requiring QA/QC monitoring data
- Hybrid technology-based and health-protective standards
- Federal baselines with state permitting implementation
- Predictable enforcement via civil penalties and settlements
WELL
WELL Building Standard v2
Key Features
- 10 concepts with 24 mandatory preconditions and 102 optimizations
- On-site performance verification testing required
- Tiered certification (Bronze to Platinum) via points
- Continuous monitoring pathways for compliance
- Applies to new and existing buildings universally
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are legally binding regulations under U.S. statutes like CAA, CWA, and RCRA, codified in 40 CFR Title 40. This regulatory framework implements environmental protection across air, water, and waste media. Primary purpose: protect human health and ecosystems via risk management. Key approach: multi-layered systems combining technology-based limits, health endpoints, and site-specific permits.
Key Components
- Statutory authorities defining mandates.
- Performance requirements (numeric limits, thresholds).
- Permitting (NPDES, Title V), monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting.
- Enforcement pathways with penalties. Built on federal-state partnership; no central certification, but compliance via audits and permits.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid strict liability penalties, shutdowns, criminal risks. Drives risk reduction, operational efficiency, ESG alignment. Enhances stakeholder trust via transparent data (ECHO, ICIS-NPDES).
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, controls design, deployment, audits. Applies to industries like manufacturing, energy; multi-state ops need layered tracking. Focus: data governance, training; ongoing via PDCA cycles.
WELL Details
What It Is
WELL Building Standard (WELL v2) is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its people-first approach emphasizes measurable indoor environmental quality and occupant outcomes via preconditions and optimizations.
Key Components
- **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
- 24 Preconditions (mandatory) and 102 Optimizations (point-earning).
- Built on public health and building science research.
- Certification via Bronze (40 pts), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80) with concept minimums at higher tiers.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives productivity, retention, higher rents (e.g., 7.7% uplift).
- Enhances ESG reporting with verifiable people metrics.
- Mitigates health risks; complements LEED for holistic sustainability.
- Builds stakeholder trust through rigorous verification.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, on-site performance verification.
- Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries.
- Requires third-party review/testing; recertification every 3 years.
Key Differences
| Aspect | EPA | WELL |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Environmental pollution control across air, water, waste | Human health and wellness in built environments |
| Industry | All industrial sectors, nationwide U.S. | Real estate, offices, healthcare globally |
| Nature | Mandatory federal regulations with enforcement | Voluntary performance-based certification |
| Testing | Continuous monitoring, EPA inspections, DMRs | On-site performance verification, annual reporting |
| Penalties | Civil/criminal fines, injunctions, shutdowns | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about EPA and WELL
EPA FAQ
WELL FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability
Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EN 1090 vs FedRAMP
EN 1090 vs FedRAMP: EU steel/aluminum execution standards for CE marking & Factory Production Control vs US federal cloud security baselines (Low/Mod/High). Compare for compliance now!
WCAG vs APRA CPS 234
Compare WCAG vs APRA CPS 234: Web accessibility standards meet Australia's financial security rules. Unlock governance, testing & compliance strategies for regulated entities now.
ISO 22000 vs ISO 41001
ISO 22000 vs ISO 41001: Food safety FSMS meets facility mgmt excellence. Both HLS/PDCA-aligned—compare hazard controls, risks, ops for seamless integration & compliance. Choose smart!