Standards Comparison

    WCAG

    Voluntary
    2023

    W3C standard for accessible web content via POUR principles

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

    Quick Verdict

    WCAG ensures accessible web content globally via testable criteria, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security capabilities for Australian financial entities. Organizations adopt WCAG for inclusivity and litigation defense; CPS 234 for regulatory compliance and operational resilience.

    Web Accessibility

    WCAG

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • POUR principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust
    • Testable success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels
    • Technology-agnostic for all web content
    • Backward-compatible additive version updates
    • Full pages and complete processes conformance
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • Commensurate capability with threats and vulnerabilities
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic independent testing and assurance required

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    WCAG Details

    What It Is

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) is the W3C's global, technology-agnostic standard for web accessibility. It ensures content is perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for people with disabilities using a layered model of principles, guidelines, and testable success criteria.

    Key Components

    • **POUR principlesPerceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust as foundational framework.
    • 13 guidelines with ~80 success criteria at A/AA/AAA levels.
    • Informative techniques, failures, and understanding documents.
    • Conformance model requires full pages, complete processes, accessibility-supported technologies, non-interference.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Fulfills legal references in ADA, Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA.
    • Mitigates litigation and regulatory risks.
    • Boosts UX, SEO, conversions, market reach for 1B+ users.
    • Builds stakeholder trust and ESG reputation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance/policy, assessment, remediation, training, tooling/CI, monitoring.
    • Suits all web-publishing orgs, industries, sizes.
    • No certification; uses VPAT/ACR, audits for claims.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities, including banks, insurers, and super funds, to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. The approach is risk-based, emphasizing proportionality to asset criticality and sensitivity.

    Key Components

    • Governance with Board ultimate responsibility and defined roles.
    • Policy framework, asset classification, and lifecycle controls.
    • Incident response plans, systematic testing, and internal audit assurance.
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents; 10-day for control weaknesses. No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes with third-party extensions.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for compliance to avoid penalties, remediation orders, and scrutiny. Enhances operational resilience, customer trust, and vendor negotiations. Reduces incident impacts, supports business continuity, and provides competitive differentiation in financial services.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, governance design, asset registers, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; group-wide for heads. Requires evidence-based assurance via testing and audits, no formal certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    WCAG
    Web content accessibility for disabilities
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security and cyber resilience

    Industry

    WCAG
    All industries worldwide
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services only

    Nature

    WCAG
    Voluntary global technical standard
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential regulation

    Testing

    WCAG
    Automated/manual WCAG success criteria tests
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent control effectiveness testing

    Penalties

    WCAG
    Litigation risk, no direct fines
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about WCAG and APRA CPS 234

    WCAG FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages