Standards Comparison

    EU AI Act

    Mandatory
    2024

    EU regulation for risk-based AI system governance

    VS

    ISO 27017

    Voluntary
    2015

    International code of practice for cloud security controls.

    Quick Verdict

    EU AI Act mandates risk-based compliance for AI systems in EU with hefty fines, while ISO 27017 provides voluntary cloud security guidance extending ISO 27001. Companies adopt AI Act for legal EU market access; ISO 27017 for cloud assurance and audits.

    Artificial Intelligence

    EU AI Act

    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Artificial Intelligence Act

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based four-tier AI classification framework
    • Prohibits unacceptable-risk AI practices outright
    • Mandates high-risk conformity assessments and CE marking
    • Regulates general-purpose AI models separately
    • Phased implementation with staggered deadlines
    Cloud Security

    ISO 27017

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security controls

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Introduces 7 cloud-specific CLD security controls
    • Clarifies shared responsibilities for CSPs and CSCs
    • Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud
    • Addresses multi-tenancy and VM segregation risks
    • Integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS certification

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    EU AI Act Details

    What It Is

    Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the EU AI Act, is a comprehensive horizontal regulation establishing a risk-based framework for AI systems across sectors. It prohibits unacceptable risks, regulates high-risk systems via lifecycle controls, mandates transparency for limited-risk AI, and minimally regulates others. Its product-safety approach treats AI as regulated products with conformity requirements.

    Key Components

    • **Four risk tiersprohibited, high-risk (Annex I/III), limited-risk, minimal-risk.
    • **High-risk obligationsrisk management (Art. 9), data governance (Art. 10), documentation (Arts. 11-13), human oversight (Art. 14), cybersecurity (Art. 15).
    • GPAI rules (Chapter V) for foundation models, including systemic risk duties.
    • **Enforcementfines up to 7% global turnover; CE marking, EU database registration.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU market access, it mitigates legal risks, ensures compliance with extraterritorial scope, builds trust via transparency, and provides competitive edges in regulated sectors like HR, biometrics, infrastructure.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased rollout (6-36 months); involves AI inventory, classification, QMS integration, conformity assessments, post-market monitoring. Applies to providers/deployers EU-wide; requires cross-functional governance, no universal certification but notified bodies for some high-risk systems.

    ISO 27017 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific information security controls. It provides implementation guidance for cloud services across IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, using a risk-based approach within an ISO 27001 ISMS.

    Key Components

    • 37 adapted ISO 27002 controls with cloud guidance
    • 7 additional CLD controls (e.g., shared responsibilities, VM segregation, asset removal)
    • Structured around 14 security domains
    • Integrated into ISO 27001 certification via audit scope extension

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Addresses shared responsibility in cloud models
    • Meets procurement, regulatory demands (e.g., GDPR alignment)
    • Mitigates multi-tenancy, virtualization risks
    • Builds stakeholder trust, competitive differentiation for CSPs/CSCs
    • Enables efficient risk management

    Implementation Overview

    • Extend existing ISO 27001 ISMS with cloud risk assessments
    • Implement controls, update SoA, train staff
    • Applies to CSPs, CSCs globally, all sizes
    • Audited jointly (9-12 months typical)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    EU AI Act
    Risk-based AI systems, prohibitions, high-risk obligations
    ISO 27017
    Cloud-specific information security controls

    Industry

    EU AI Act
    All sectors using AI in EU, global extraterritorial reach
    ISO 27017
    Cloud providers and users, all industries globally

    Nature

    EU AI Act
    Mandatory EU regulation with fines
    ISO 27017
    Voluntary guidance extending ISO 27001

    Testing

    EU AI Act
    Conformity assessments, notified bodies for high-risk
    ISO 27017
    ISO 27001 audits including cloud controls

    Penalties

    EU AI Act
    Up to 7% global turnover fines
    ISO 27017
    No legal penalties, certification loss only

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about EU AI Act and ISO 27017

    EU AI Act FAQ

    ISO 27017 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages