What is the primary objective of **FERPA**?

**FERPA’s primary objective is to protect the privacy of parents and students by regulating access to and disclosure of personally identifiable information (PII) in education records.** Enacted in 1974 as section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. § 1232g) with regulations at 34 CFR Part 99, it grants rights to inspect and review records within 45 days (§99.10), seek amendments for inaccurate or misleading information (§99.20), and control disclosures via written consent unless exceptions apply (§99.30).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FERPA**?

**FERPA applies to educational agencies or institutions receiving funds under any program administered by the U.S. Secretary of Education, extending institution-wide to all components (§99.1).** This includes public K-12 districts, most postsecondary institutions via student aid like Pell Grants (§99.1(c)(2)), and their agents or vendors treated as school officials (§99.31(a)(1)(i)(B)). Purely private K-12 schools without federal funds are exempt (§99.1(b)).

Does **FERPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, FERPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal policies, annual notifications (§99.7), disclosure recordkeeping (§99.32), and responsiveness to Department of Education investigations by the Family Policy Compliance Office (§99.60–67). Institutions must maintain auditable artifacts like logs and vendor contracts.

How often should an assessment for **FERPA** be performed?

**FERPA requires annual notification of rights to parents or eligible students (§99.7(a)), but does not specify assessment frequency.** Best practice involves periodic internal reviews of policies, access controls, and disclosure logs aligned with §99.32, plus data inventories and vendor audits to ensure ongoing compliance with evolving data practices.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FERPA**?

**Non-compliance can result in Department of Education enforcement actions, including withholding federal funds, cease-and-desist orders, or termination of funding eligibility (§99.67(a)).** Third-party violators face five-year PII access bans (§99.67(c)–(e)); complaints trigger investigations (§99.63), potentially leading to corrective actions and reputational harm.

Can **FERPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, FERPA’s controls for PII in education records, consent, and disclosures can be mapped to frameworks like GDPR or CCPA for gap analysis.** Core alignments include data minimization, access rights (§99.10), and vendor oversight (§99.31(a)(1)(i)(B)), though FERPA lacks private rights of action or direct fines.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FERPA**?

**The first step is publishing an annual notification of FERPA rights, specifying procedures for inspection, amendment, consent, and—if used—criteria for school officials and legitimate educational interests (§99.7(a)).** This institution-wide notice (§99.1(d)) informs parents/eligible students and establishes governance baseline.

What is the primary objective of **GLBA**?

**The primary objective of GLBA is to require financial institutions to explain their information-sharing practices and safeguard nonpublic personal information (NPI).** Enacted in 1999, GLBA mandates transparency via the **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)** for notices and opt-outs on sharing NPI with nonaffiliated third parties, and protection via the **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)** for a comprehensive information security program with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GLBA**?

**GLBA applies to any "financial institution" handling NPI, defined broadly by activities like loans, financial advice, or insurance.** Under FTC jurisdiction, this includes non-banks such as mortgage lenders, payday lenders, debt collectors, tax preparation firms, check cashers, and auto dealers arranging financing. Entities with fewer than 5,000 customers have limited exemptions from some written requirements but must still implement reasonable safeguards.

Does **GLBA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, GLBA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **Safeguards Rule** requires internal risk assessments, vulnerability scans, and penetration testing (at least annually for critical systems), plus service provider oversight with contractual safeguards. Organizations must designate a **Qualified Individual** for program oversight and provide annual written reports to the board or senior officers, with evidence maintained for regulatory review.

How often should an assessment for **GLBA** be performed?

**GLBA assessments must be performed periodically, at least annually, and upon material changes in operations, technology, or threats.** The revised **Safeguards Rule** (effective June 2023) mandates written risk assessments inventorying NPI, evaluating threats, and defining risk criteria, driving continuous updates to the information security program, testing, and service provider monitoring.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GLBA**?

**Non-compliance with GLBA can result in civil penalties up to $100,000 per violation for institutions and $10,000 per violation for individuals, plus up to 5 years imprisonment for willful violations.** FTC enforcement examples include Equifax, PayPal, and TaxSlayer cases, with additional reputational harm, remediation orders, and public breach notifications for incidents affecting 500+ consumers (30-day FTC reporting required since May 2024).

Can **GLBA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, GLBA elements map directly to frameworks like NIST CSF, NIST SP 800-53, and ISO 27001.** The **Safeguards Rule** aligns with risk assessments, access controls, encryption, incident response, and vendor oversight in these standards, enabling integrated compliance without independent treatment.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GLBA**?

**The first step is to determine applicability by inventorying NPI flows and designating a Qualified Individual to oversee the program.** Conduct a scoping exercise mapping data collection, storage, sharing, and vendors, followed by a written risk assessment to prioritize safeguards, privacy notices, and board reporting per the **Safeguards Rule**.

FERPA vs GLBA | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

FERPA

Mandatory

1974

U.S. federal law protecting student education records privacy

GLBA

Mandatory

1999

U.S. law for financial privacy and data safeguards

Quick Verdict

FERPA protects student education records for schools receiving federal funds, mandating access rights and disclosure controls. GLBA safeguards consumer financial data for financial institutions, requiring privacy notices and security programs. Organizations adopt them to ensure compliance, avoid penalties, and build trust.

Student Privacy

FERPA

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Grants rights to inspect, amend, and consent to education record disclosures
Requires prior written consent for PII except enumerated exceptions
Expansive PII definition includes linkable indirect identifiers
Mandates 45-day record access and annual rights notifications
Applies institution-wide to federal education fund recipients

Financial Privacy

GLBA

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
Written information security program with safeguards
Qualified Individual for program oversight and reporting
Breach notification within 30 days for 500+ consumers
Service provider oversight and risk assessments

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FERPA Details

What It Is

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), enacted 1974 as section 444 of GEPA, codified at 20 U.S.C. §1232g with regulations at 34 CFR Part 99. U.S. federal regulation safeguarding privacy of student education records and PII for parents/eligible students. Establishes rights-based framework with consent requirements balanced by operational exceptions.

Key Components

Core rights: inspect/review records (45 days), amend inaccurate/misleading info, consent to PII disclosures.
Definitions: broad education records, expansive PII (direct/indirect/linkable), directory information.
Disclosures: general consent + exceptions (school officials/LEI, emergencies, audits, subpoenas).
Obligations: annual notices, disclosure logs (§99.32), vendor controls. Enforced via complaints/fund withholding; no certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for federal fund recipients (K-12/postsecondary).
Mitigates enforcement risks, reputational harm, lawsuits.
Enables secure data sharing, edtech integration, analytics.
Builds stakeholder trust, supports institutional functions.

Implementation Overview

Phased: governance, data inventory/classification, policies/training, RBAC/logging, vendor TPRM.
Applies U.S. educational agencies/institutions; ongoing monitoring/audits required.

GLBA Details

What It Is

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1999. It establishes a regulatory framework for consumer financial privacy and data security in financial institutions. GLBA uses a risk-based approach through its Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule to protect nonpublic personal information (NPI).

Key Components

**Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Requires notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing.
**Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Mandates a comprehensive security program with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards.
**Pretexting provisionsProhibits obtaining NPI under false pretenses. Built on transparency, choice, and security principles; enforced by FTC for non-banks, no formal certification but requires audits and reporting.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal compliance to avoid FTC penalties up to $100,000 per violation.
Risk mitigation against breaches and enforcement.
Builds customer trust and competitive edge in financial services.
Enhances governance and vendor oversight.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: scoping, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls, training, testing. Applies to broad financial institutions (banks, fintech, tax firms); U.S.-focused; involves ongoing audits, board reporting, no certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	FERPA	GLBA
Scope	Student education records and PII privacy	Consumer financial NPI privacy and security
Industry	Educational institutions receiving federal funds	Financial institutions including non-banks
Nature	Mandatory federal regulation with funding leverage	Mandatory federal regulation with civil penalties
Testing	Disclosure logging and access request processes	Risk assessments, pen tests, vulnerability scans
Penalties	Federal funding withholding and complaints process	Civil penalties up to $100k per violation

Scope

FERPA

Student education records and PII privacy

GLBA

Consumer financial NPI privacy and security

Industry

FERPA

Educational institutions receiving federal funds

GLBA

Financial institutions including non-banks

Nature

FERPA

Mandatory federal regulation with funding leverage

GLBA

Mandatory federal regulation with civil penalties

Testing

FERPA

Disclosure logging and access request processes

GLBA

Risk assessments, pen tests, vulnerability scans

Penalties

FERPA

Federal funding withholding and complaints process

GLBA

Civil penalties up to $100k per violation

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FERPA and GLBA

FERPA FAQ

GLBA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IATF 16949 vs GDPR UK

Compare IATF 16949 vs UK GDPR: Vital insights for automotive leaders balancing quality standards with data privacy compliance. Align both for seamless UK supply chain success.

ENERGY STAR vs FSSC 22000

Compare ENERGY STAR vs FSSC 22000: Energy efficiency label vs food safety scheme. Uncover scope, requirements, benefits & implementation for compliance success. Dive in!

APPI vs HITRUST CSF

Compare APPI vs HITRUST CSF: Japan's privacy law vs certifiable security framework. Uncover key differences, compliance tips & implementation for global data handlers. Secure your edge now.

FERPA

GLBA

Quick Verdict

FERPA

Key Features

GLBA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FERPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

GLBA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

FERPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of FERPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FERPA?

Does FERPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FERPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FERPA?

Can FERPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FERPA?

GLBA FAQ

What is the primary objective of GLBA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GLBA?

Does GLBA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GLBA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GLBA?

Can GLBA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GLBA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IATF 16949 vs GDPR UK

ENERGY STAR vs FSSC 22000

APPI vs HITRUST CSF