What is the primary objective of **FERPA**?

**FERPA’s primary objective is to protect the privacy of parents and students by regulating access to and disclosure of personally identifiable information (PII) in education records.** Enacted in 1974 as section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. § 1232g) with regulations at 34 CFR Part 99, it grants rights to inspect records within 45 days (§99.10), seek amendments for inaccurate or misleading information (§99.20), and require written consent for disclosures unless exceptions apply (§99.30).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FERPA**?

**FERPA applies to educational agencies or institutions receiving funds under any program administered by the U.S. Secretary of Education.** This includes public K-12 districts, most postsecondary institutions via student aid like Pell Grants (§99.1(c)), and applies institution-wide to all components (§99.1(d)). Rights holders are parents of minors and “eligible students” (age 18+ or postsecondary attendees), with rights transferring at eligibility (§99.5).

Does **FERPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, FERPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal policies, annual notifications (§99.7), disclosure recordkeeping (§99.32), and response to Department of Education investigations by the Family Policy Compliance Office (§99.60). Institutions must maintain auditable records but self-certify adherence.

How often should an assessment for **FERPA** be performed?

**FERPA requires annual notification of rights to parents and eligible students (§99.7(a)(1)), but does not specify assessment frequency.** Best practice involves periodic internal reviews of policies, access controls, and disclosure logs, aligned with data governance cycles, to ensure ongoing compliance with recordkeeping (§99.32) and procedural obligations like 45-day access responses (§99.10).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FERPA**?

**Non-compliance can result in Department of Education enforcement, including withholding federal funds, cease-and-desist orders, or termination of funding eligibility (§99.67(a)).** The Family Policy Compliance Office investigates complaints filed within 180 days (§99.63-64), may bar violating third parties from PII access for five years (§99.67(c)-(e)), and requires corrective actions without private right of action for damages.

Can **FERPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**FERPA is a U.S.-specific statute with no explicit mappings to international frameworks in its regulations.** Its controls for PII in education records (34 CFR §99.3), consent (§99.30), and exceptions (§99.31) may align conceptually with global privacy laws, but compliance remains standalone, focusing on U.S. federal funding conditions (§99.1).

What is the first step to begin implementing **FERPA**?

**The first step is to issue an annual notification of FERPA rights to parents and eligible students (§99.7(a)).** This must detail inspection procedures, amendment processes, consent rules, complaint filing, and—if used—criteria for school officials and legitimate educational interests (§99.7(a)(3)), provided via means reasonably likely to inform (§99.7(b)).

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to enable aviation maintenance organizations to consistently provide products and services meeting customer and applicable statutory/regulatory requirements while enhancing customer satisfaction through effective QMS application and continual improvement.** It incorporates ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure across Clauses 4–10, adding maintenance-specific controls like configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, traceability, preservation, and human factors consideration to ensure continuing airworthiness.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to aviation maintenance organizations, including repair stations and MRO providers, regardless of size, performing maintenance, repair, overhaul, or continuing airworthiness management.** It targets entities whose primary business involves these services for civil/military aircraft, including OEMs with autonomous MRO operations; certification is often mandated by customers, OEMs, or regulators for OASIS listing and contract eligibility.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies, with the QMS fully operational for at least three months, including a full internal audit cycle and management review.** Stage 1 audits review documentation; Stage 2 verifies implementation via on-site evidence of processes like operational planning and release controls.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal audits for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and importance, with full cycles completed before certification.** Surveillance audits occur annually post-certification, recertification every three years; management reviews are regular, using performance data from monitoring and audits.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from contracts, regulatory sanctions, and safety incidents from inadequate controls.** It can lead to OASIS delisting, fines, certificate suspension (e.g., under FAA/EASA Part 145), rework costs, AOG events, litigation, and reputational damage in high-risk MRO environments.

Can **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C aligns with ISO 9001:2015 via Annex SL high-level structure and shares terminology like documented information and external providers.** IAQG provides correlation matrices linking Clauses 4–10 to aviation regulations (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145), facilitating integrated QMS without exclusions unless justified in scope.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step to implement AS9110C is to define QMS scope, determine internal/external issues (Clause 4), and conduct a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 using IAQG checklists.** Secure executive sponsorship, map regulatory/customer requirements, and justify any non-applicable clauses to establish boundaries and prioritize risks.

FERPA vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

FERPA

Mandatory

1974

U.S. federal regulation protecting student education records privacy

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

International standard for aviation maintenance quality management

Quick Verdict

FERPA protects student privacy in U.S. education via access and consent rules, enforced by funding cuts. AS9110C ensures aviation maintenance quality through audits and risk controls, adopted voluntarily for market access and safety.

Student Privacy

FERPA

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Establishes rights to inspect and review education records within 45 days
Requires prior written consent for most PII disclosures from records
Defines expansive PII including direct, indirect, and linkable identifiers
Provides enumerated exceptions for school officials and emergencies
Mandates annual notices and disclosure recordkeeping logs

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: Quality Management Systems Requirements for Aviation Maintenance Organizations

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking in strategic and operational planning
Configuration management and traceability controls
Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention
Human factors in root cause analysis
Dedicated safety policy and leadership accountability

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FERPA Details

What It Is

FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974; 20 U.S.C. §1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a U.S. federal regulation. It protects privacy of personally identifiable information (PII) in education records for institutions receiving federal education funds. Employs rights-based approach with consent rules, exceptions, and operational controls balancing privacy and education needs.

Key Components

Core rights: inspect/review within 45 days, amend inaccurate/misleading records, prior consent for disclosures.
Definitions: broad education records, expansive PII (linkable identifiers), directory information.
Disclosures: consent default + 15+ exceptions (school officials/legitimate interest, emergencies, audits).
Obligations: annual notices, disclosure logs, amendment hearings. Enforcement via complaints, funding leverage; no certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for K-12/postsecondary receiving federal funds (e.g., Title I, Pell Grants).
Prevents funding loss, lawsuits, reputational harm.
Enables compliant data sharing, vendor use, analytics.
Builds trust with students/parents, supports innovation.

Implementation Overview

Phased program: governance setup, data inventory/classification, policies/training/RBAC, vendor contracts/audits, logging/incident response. Applies to funded educational agencies/institutions; ongoing monitoring, no external audits required.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance organizations (MROs), such as repair stations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with Annex SL structure, emphasizing risk-based thinking, PDCA cycle, and aviation-specific requirements for continuing airworthiness.

Key Components

Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, product safety, traceability, external provider controls.
No fixed number of controls; focuses on documented information and process effectiveness.
Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies with audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part 145).
Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability for airworthiness.
Enhances on-time delivery, customer satisfaction, market access via OASIS.
Builds stakeholder trust through demonstrable QMS maturity.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-12 months typical).
Applies to MROs of all sizes globally; requires operational evidence pre-certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	FERPA	AS9110C
Scope	Student education records privacy	Aviation maintenance QMS
Industry	U.S. education institutions	Aerospace MRO organizations
Nature	Federal privacy regulation	Voluntary certification standard
Testing	Complaint investigations	Internal/external audits
Penalties	Federal funding withholding	Loss of certification

Scope

FERPA

Student education records privacy

AS9110C

Aviation maintenance QMS

Industry

FERPA

U.S. education institutions

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO organizations

Nature

FERPA

Federal privacy regulation

AS9110C

Voluntary certification standard

Testing

FERPA

Complaint investigations

AS9110C

Internal/external audits

Penalties

FERPA

Federal funding withholding

AS9110C

Loss of certification

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FERPA and AS9110C

FERPA FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact

Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IEC 62443 vs Australian Privacy Act

Compare IEC 62443 vs Australian Privacy Act: Align industrial cybersecurity standards with privacy laws for OT resilience. Key insights on zones, SLs, APP 11 security. Boost compliance now!

EN 1090 vs 23 NYCRR 500

EN 1090 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Compare EU steel/aluminum CE marking standards with NY cybersecurity regs. Master execution classes, FPC certification, risk assessments & compliance strategies now.

CCPA vs GMP

Compare CCPA vs GMP: Decode privacy rights, data security & consumer protections vs manufacturing quality controls. Master compliance strategies for business resilience now!

FERPA

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

FERPA

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FERPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

FERPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of FERPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FERPA?

Does FERPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FERPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FERPA?

Can FERPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FERPA?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

Can AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

IEC 62443 vs Australian Privacy Act

EN 1090 vs 23 NYCRR 500

CCPA vs GMP