GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/EN 1090 vs 23 NYCRR 500
    Standards Comparison

    EN 1090 vs 23 NYCRR 500

    EN 1090

    Mandatory
    2009

    European standard for steel/aluminium structural execution and conformity

    VS

    23 NYCRR 500

    Mandatory
    2017

    NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity.

    Quick Verdict

    EN 1090 enables CE marking for structural metal components in Europe, ensuring fabrication quality via FPC. 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY financial firms, protecting NPI through governance and controls. Fabricators need EN 1090 for market access; financiers require Part 500 compliance.

    Structural Metalwork

    EN 1090

    EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4) scaling requirements
    • Mandatory Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
    • Enables CE marking under CPR for structures
    • Detailed technical execution rules for steel/aluminium
    • Welding quality management via ISO 3834 alignment
    Financial Services

    23 NYCRR 500

    23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Annual CISO/CEO dual-signature compliance certification
    • 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for privileged and remote access
    • Comprehensive TPSP risk management and contractual controls
    • Risk-based penetration testing and vulnerability assessments

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    EN 1090 Details

    What It Is

    EN 1090 is the European harmonized standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) for execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). It provides a risk-based framework via Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4) to ensure controlled fabrication, assembly, and market placement with CE marking.

    Key Components

    • **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC), Declaration of Performance (DoP).
    • **EN 1090-2/-3Technical requirements for steel/aluminium (materials, welding, tolerances, corrosion protection, NDT).
    • Core principles: traceability, welding coordination (ISO 3834), risk-scaled inspection.
    • Certification model: Notified Body audits FPC with ongoing surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU/EEA market access; reduces liability, ensures quality; enables high-risk projects (EXC3/EXC4); builds trust via certified capability; aligns with sustainability trends.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, FPC build, personnel qualification, NB certification (3-12 months). Applies to fabricators of load-bearing components; requires welding expertise, digital traceability.

    23 NYCRR 500 Details

    What It Is

    23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a prescriptive state-level mandate for financial services entities. It establishes minimum risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems' confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The approach is hybrid: risk-based tailoring with prescriptive elements like MFA and incident reporting.

    Key Components

    • 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program, CISO governance, risk assessments, MFA, encryption, penetration testing, TPSP oversight, and 72-hour incident notification.
    • Built on risk assessment architecture; annual dual CISO/CEO certification with 5-year record retention.
    • Class A companies face enhanced controls like independent audits and EDR.
    • Compliance model emphasizes evidence-based attestation, not third-party certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for NY-licensed financial entities (banks, insurers, etc.) to avoid multimillion-dollar fines.
    • Reduces cyber incident risk, strengthens governance, and builds stakeholder trust.
    • Provides competitive edge via robust TPSP management and resilience.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: gap analysis, asset inventory, MFA rollout, TPSP contracts, testing.
    • Applies to Covered Entities in NY financial services; scalable by size/complexity.
    • No formal certification; annual filing and DFS examinations required. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    AspectEN 109023 NYCRR 500
    ScopeStructural steel/aluminium execution & conformityCybersecurity for financial information systems
    IndustryConstruction/manufacturing, EEA market accessNY financial services entities only
    NatureHarmonized CE marking standard, mandatory for marketState regulation with fines/enforcement
    TestingFPC certification, surveillance audits by Notified BodiesAnnual pen testing, vulnerability scans, risk assessments
    PenaltiesMarket exclusion, no CE markingMulti-million fines, consent orders

    Scope

    EN 1090
    Structural steel/aluminium execution & conformity
    23 NYCRR 500
    Cybersecurity for financial information systems

    Industry

    EN 1090
    Construction/manufacturing, EEA market access
    23 NYCRR 500
    NY financial services entities only

    Nature

    EN 1090
    Harmonized CE marking standard, mandatory for market
    23 NYCRR 500
    State regulation with fines/enforcement

    Testing

    EN 1090
    FPC certification, surveillance audits by Notified Bodies
    23 NYCRR 500
    Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans, risk assessments

    Penalties

    EN 1090
    Market exclusion, no CE marking
    23 NYCRR 500
    Multi-million fines, consent orders

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about EN 1090 and 23 NYCRR 500

    EN 1090 FAQ

    23 NYCRR 500 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

    Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

    Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

    Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

    Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)

    Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

    Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

    Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance

    Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how EN 1090 and 23 NYCRR 500 compare against other standards

    Other EN 1090 Comparisons

    • EN 1090 vs NERC CIP
    • EN 1090 vs GRI
    • EPA vs EN 1090
    • SQF vs EN 1090
    • ISO 14001 vs EN 1090

    Other 23 NYCRR 500 Comparisons

    • ISO 55001 vs 23 NYCRR 500
    • WCAG vs 23 NYCRR 500
    • 23 NYCRR 500 vs EU AI Act
    • DORA vs 23 NYCRR 500
    • NIS2 vs 23 NYCRR 500
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved