FERPA
U.S. federal law protecting student education records privacy
BRC
Global standard for food safety management
Quick Verdict
FERPA mandates student record privacy for U.S. schools receiving federal funds, while BRC is voluntary certification ensuring food safety for manufacturers. Schools adopt FERPA for compliance and funding; food firms pursue BRC for retailer access and risk reduction.
FERPA
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act
Key Features
- Grants access, amendment, and consent rights over education records
- Requires prior written consent for PII disclosures with exceptions
- Mandates 45-day inspection timeline and hearing procedures
- Defines expansive PII including re-identification risks
- Imposes disclosure logging and annual rights notifications
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety
Key Features
- HACCP-based food safety plan with fundamentals
- Senior management commitment and culture plan
- Environmental monitoring and risk zoning
- Unannounced audits for higher grades
- Strict scope and exclusion rules
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
FERPA Details
What It Is
FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99) is a U.S. federal regulation establishing privacy protections for education records at institutions receiving Department of Education funds. Its primary purpose is safeguarding personally identifiable information (PII) through rights to access, amend records, and control disclosures. It uses a rights-based, exception-driven approach balancing privacy with educational operations.
Key Components
- Core rights: inspect/review (45 days), amend inaccurate records, consent to PII disclosures.
- **Expansive definitionseducation records, PII (direct/indirect identifiers), directory information.
- Disclosure exceptions (e.g., school officials, health/safety emergencies, subpoenas).
- Compliance mandates: annual notices, disclosure logs, vendor controls.
- Enforcement via funding withholding and complaints to Family Policy Compliance Office.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for federally funded schools to avoid penalties, reputational harm. Enables secure data sharing, builds stakeholder trust, supports edtech innovation while mitigating breach risks.
Implementation Overview
Phased program: governance setup, data inventory, policies/training, RBAC/tech controls, vendor DPAs, audits. Applies to K-12/postsecondary; no certification but ongoing FPCO oversight. (178 words)
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured, auditable management system combining senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based plans, and prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP plan, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, internal audits) critical for certification.
- Built on risk-based hazard analysis including fraud, malicious contamination.
- Annual audits (announced/unannounced) with grading (AA/A/B/C/D).
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer mandates for supply chain access.
- Reduces recalls via robust controls on allergens, pathogens, labelling.
- Enhances due diligence, operational resilience, FSMA alignment.
- Builds trust with stakeholders through third-party verification.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, mock audits. Applies to manufacturers globally; requires CAPEX for site upgrades, ongoing audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | FERPA | BRC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Student education records privacy and access rights | Food manufacturing safety, quality, and operations |
| Industry | U.S. education (K-12, postsecondary) | Global food manufacturing and supply chain |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. federal law for funded institutions | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification |
| Testing | Department of Education complaint investigations | Annual third-party site audits |
| Penalties | Federal funding withholding | Certification loss and market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about FERPA and BRC
FERPA FAQ
BRC FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application
Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
HITRUST CSF vs EMAS
Discover HITRUST CSF vs EMAS: cybersecurity assurance powerhouse meets EU environmental gold standard. Unpack differences, benefits & choose your compliance path now.
GDPR UK vs ISO 27701
Compare GDPR UK vs ISO 27701: Key differences in principles, enforcement, DPIAs & transfers. Align compliance for ICO fines avoidance & PIMS certification. Read now!
DORA vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
Compare DORA vs CSL: EU financial resilience meets China's data fortress. Key diffs in ICT risks, testing, third-party oversight & localization. Master global compliance now!