Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law for risk-based information security management

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global certification framework for sustainable built environment

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates cybersecurity risk management for US federal systems via NIST RMF, while BREEAM voluntarily certifies sustainable building performance. Agencies comply with FISMA to avoid penalties; developers pursue BREEAM for value uplift, ESG credibility, and market advantage.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Credit-based scoring with category weightings
    • Third-party certification by BRE Global
    • 10 core sustainability assessment categories
    • Scheme-specific for lifecycle stages and assets
    • Continuous updates via KBCNs and Version 7

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. Enacted in 2002 and modernized in 2014, it mandates agency-wide information security programs using the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) with seven steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.

    Key Components

    • NIST SP 800-53 controls tailored by FIPS 199 impact levels (Low/Moderate/High).
    • Continuous monitoring via SP 800-137 and CDM tools.
    • System Security Plans (SSPs), POA&Ms, and Authorizations to Operate (ATOs).
    • Oversight through OMB policy, CISA metrics, and IG evaluations using maturity models.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid IG downgrades, contract losses, and funding cuts. It reduces breach risks, enables market access (e.g., FedRAMP), and builds resilience via integrated risk management.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased RMF application: inventory assets, categorize systems, deploy controls, assess continuously. Applies to all federal executive agencies, contractors handling federal data; requires annual reporting, no central certification but IG audits.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability assessment and certification framework for the built environment. It evaluates performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities throughout their lifecycle, using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology that translates sustainability measures into ratings from Pass to Outstanding.

    Key Components

    • Core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation (10 primary domains).
    • Credits awarded for compliance with issue-specific criteria, evidence requirements, and prerequisites.
    • Built on third-party assurance via licensed assessors and BRE Global audits.
    • Certification model includes design-stage and post-construction stages, with ongoing updates through Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reductions), asset value uplift (up to 30%), and ESG alignment.
    • Supports regulatory incentives, tenant demands, and investor requirements like EU Taxonomy.
    • Mitigates risks in climate resilience, greenwashing, and performance gaps.
    • Enhances market differentiation and stakeholder trust via credible ratings.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: early assessor appointment, pre-assessment, evidence gathering, BRE QA.
    • Applies to all sizes, built environment sectors, globally with local adaptations.
    • Requires licensed assessors; certification via BRE Global.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FISMA
    Federal info systems cybersecurity risk management
    BREEAM
    Built environment sustainability and performance

    Industry

    FISMA
    US federal agencies, contractors, government tech
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure worldwide

    Nature

    FISMA
    Mandatory US federal law with NIST RMF
    BREEAM
    Voluntary third-party certification scheme

    Testing

    FISMA
    Continuous monitoring, IG annual assessments, RMF ATO
    BREEAM
    Licensed assessor audits, BRE quality assurance certification

    Penalties

    FISMA
    Contract loss, debarment, IG reports, funding cuts
    BREEAM
    No penalties, loss of certification and market prestige

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and BREEAM

    FISMA FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages