GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/PCI DSS vs ISO 27018
    Standards Comparison

    PCI DSS vs ISO 27018

    PCI DSS

    Mandatory
    2022

    Industry standard protecting payment cardholder data security

    VS

    ISO 27018

    Voluntary
    2019

    Code of practice for PII protection in public clouds

    Quick Verdict

    PCI DSS mandates cardholder data security for payment entities via 12 requirements and audits, while ISO 27018 provides privacy controls for cloud PII processors within ISO 27001. Companies adopt PCI DSS for contractual compliance, ISO 27018 for cloud trust and procurement.

    Payment Security

    PCI DSS

    Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 12 requirements across 6 control objectives protecting CHD
    • Over 300 granular controls and sub-requirements
    • Transaction-volume-based merchant compliance levels 1-4
    • Quarterly ASV vulnerability scans and pentesting
    • Network segmentation minimizing Cardholder Data Environment
    Cloud Privacy

    ISO 27018

    ISO/IEC 27018:2019 Code of practice for PII protection

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Privacy controls for public cloud PII processors
    • Subprocessor transparency and location disclosures
    • Customer breach notification requirements
    • Prohibits PII use for advertising without consent
    • Supports data minimization and retention limits

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PCI DSS Details

    What It Is

    PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a contractual cybersecurity standard developed by major payment brands and managed by the PCI Security Standards Council since 2006. It mandates protection of cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) for merchants and service providers handling credit/debit card transactions globally. The control-based approach enforces 12 technical/operational requirements across 6 objectives, evolving via three-year cycles (v4.0 mandatory 2024).

    Key Components

    • 12 core requirements under 6 objectives: secure networks, protect CHD, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring, policies.
    • 300+ sub-requirements/controls, emphasizing encryption, MFA, segmentation.
    • Compliance model: 4 merchant levels (1 highest volume: QSA ROC + ASV scans), 2 service provider levels; SAQ for lower levels.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandate to process cards, avoiding fines, bans, GDPR penalties (€20M+).
    • Reduces breach costs ($37/record), fraud, builds trust.
    • Enhances risk management, customer confidence, competitive edge in payments.

    Implementation Overview

    • Gap analysis, CDE scoping, data flows, segmentation.
    • Deploy controls, quarterly ASV scans, pentests, audits.
    • Universal for card-handling entities; costs $5K-$200K+, ongoing maintenance challenging (47.5% fail sustainment).

    ISO 27018 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27018:2019 is an international code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 specifically for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) processed by public cloud service providers (CSPs) acting as PII processors. Its scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border data flows. It employs a risk-based, control-oriented approach integrated into an Information Security Management System (ISMS).

    Key Components

    • ~25–30 additional privacy-specific controls mapped to organizational, people, physical, and technological themes.
    • Core principles: consent/choice, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, limited retention/disclosure, security safeguards, transparency, accountability.
    • Relies on ISO 27001 certification; ISO 27018 controls assessed during ISO 27001 audits via Statement of Applicability (SoA).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances customer trust, accelerates procurement, supports regulatory alignment (GDPR Article 28, HIPAA).
    • Reduces security questionnaire friction, improves cyber insurance terms.
    • Provides competitive differentiation for CSPs demonstrating privacy stewardship.

    Implementation Overview

    • Start with gap analysis against existing ISMS; integrate controls, update documentation.
    • Key activities: subprocessor disclosures, breach notification procedures, staff training.
    • Suited for CSPs of all sizes globally; requires accredited third-party audits within ISO 27001 cycle.

    Key Differences

    AspectPCI DSSISO 27018
    ScopeCardholder data protectionPII in public clouds
    IndustryPayment processing entitiesCloud service providers
    NatureContractual security standardPrivacy code of practice
    TestingQSA audits, quarterly scansISO 27001 extension audits
    PenaltiesFines, processing bansNo direct penalties

    Scope

    PCI DSS
    Cardholder data protection
    ISO 27018
    PII in public clouds

    Industry

    PCI DSS
    Payment processing entities
    ISO 27018
    Cloud service providers

    Nature

    PCI DSS
    Contractual security standard
    ISO 27018
    Privacy code of practice

    Testing

    PCI DSS
    QSA audits, quarterly scans
    ISO 27018
    ISO 27001 extension audits

    Penalties

    PCI DSS
    Fines, processing bans
    ISO 27018
    No direct penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PCI DSS and ISO 27018

    PCI DSS FAQ

    ISO 27018 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

    From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

    From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

    Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

    Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

    Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

    Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how PCI DSS and ISO 27018 compare against other standards

    Other PCI DSS Comparisons

    • PCI DSS vs CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    • PCI DSS vs MAS TRM
    • PCI DSS vs NIST CSF
    • NIS2 vs PCI DSS
    • DORA vs PCI DSS

    Other ISO 27018 Comparisons

    • ISO 27018 vs GDPR
    • WEEE vs ISO 27018
    • ISO 27018 vs ISO 27017
    • NIST CSF vs ISO 27018
    • ISO 27018 vs FedRAMP
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved