What is the primary objective of **FISMA**?

**FISMA's primary objective is to provide a comprehensive framework for federal agencies to develop, document, document, and assess information security programs that protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of federal information and information systems.** Enacted in 2002 and modernized in 2014, it mandates risk-based protections using NIST’s **Risk Management Framework (RMF)** (NIST SP 800-37), including system categorization per **FIPS 199**, control selection from **NIST SP 800-53**, and continuous monitoring to ensure security is commensurate with risk and mission needs.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FISMA**?

**FISMA legally requires compliance from all U.S. federal executive branch civilian agencies and any contractors, vendors, or service providers operating federal information systems or processing federal data on their behalf.** This includes cloud providers under **FedRAMP**, state/local entities managing federal programs (e.g., Medicaid), and system integrators; national security systems are excluded and follow separate frameworks. Agency heads, CIOs, CISOs, and Authorizing Officials bear direct responsibility, with oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA, and Inspectors General.

Does **FISMA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**FISMA requires independent annual evaluations by agency Inspectors General (IGs) or external auditors, but does not mandate third-party certification like ISO standards.** IGs assess program maturity using CISA’s core/supplemental metrics (e.g., 20 core metrics aligned to NIST CSF functions) across domains like risk management and continuous monitoring, reporting via CyberScope to OMB. Contractors face agency-driven assessments, often via DCSA for DoD-aligned systems.

How often should an assessment for **FISMA** be performed?

**FISMA requires annual independent evaluations by Inspectors General, complemented by ongoing continuous monitoring as part of the RMF Monitor step.** Agencies submit CIO/IG/SAOP reports yearly to OMB by July 31, with real-time major incident reporting to Congress (within 30 days for significant PII breaches). System-level assessments occur via continuous diagnostics (e.g., CDM tools), with POA&Ms tracked ongoing and ATOs maintained through dynamic risk reviews.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FISMA**?

**FISMA non-compliance results in unfavorable IG maturity ratings (e.g., "Not Effective"), OMB remediation directives, operational restrictions, loss of federal contracts/funding, and debarment for contractors.** Agencies face public GAO scrutiny, reduced mission capability, and Congressional oversight; contractors risk termination under DFARS clauses. No direct fines exist, but repeated failures (e.g., HHS’s multi-year low ratings) trigger heightened DHS/CISA intervention and reputational damage.

An **FISMA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**FISMA does not officially map to other international frameworks within its statutory scope, as it is a U.S. federal law focused exclusively on domestic civilian agency requirements.** Its NIST RMF and SP 800-53 controls share conceptual alignments (e.g., risk-based approach), but official guidance emphasizes standalone implementation for federal systems, with reciprocity limited to U.S. contexts like FedRAMP.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FISMA**?

**The first step to implement FISMA is the RMF Prepare phase: establish governance, assign roles (e.g., CIO, CISO, Authorizing Official), and develop an authoritative system inventory.** Create a risk management strategy, categorize systems per FIPS 199, and define boundaries/data flows using tools like a CMDB, securing executive sponsorship to align security with mission priorities.

What is the primary objective of **COBIT**?

**COBIT's primary objective is to support understanding, designing, and implementing enterprise governance and management of information and technology (EGIT) to create value from I&T, manage risk, and optimize resources.** COBIT 2019 achieves this through a core model of **40 governance and management objectives** across five domains (**EDM**, **APO**, **BAI**, **DSS**, **MEA**), guided by **six governance system principles** and supported by **seven components** (processes, organizational structures, principles/policies, information, culture/behavior, services/infrastructure, people/skills).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COBIT**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with COBIT, as it is a voluntary framework developed by ISACA, not a regulation.** Professionally, it is required for ISACA credentials like **COBIT 2019 Foundation** and **Design & Implementation** certifications, and recommended for executives, CIOs, auditors (e.g., **CGEIT**, **CISA** holders), and GRC professionals in enterprises relying on I&T for value creation, risk management, and compliance alignment.

Does **COBIT** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COBIT does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it is a framework, not a certifiable standard.** Organizations may conduct internal capability assessments using the **CMMI-based performance management model** (levels 0-5) or engage ISACA-accredited assessors for voluntary assurance via **MEA04 Managed Assurance**, providing evidence for governance maturity without formal certification.

How often should an assessment for **COBIT** be performed?

**COBIT assessments should be performed annually or upon significant changes in enterprise context, using the COBIT Performance Management (CPM) model.** The framework's dynamic governance system principle requires ongoing monitoring via **MEA** domain objectives, with capability levels (0-5) reassessed through gap analyses tied to **11 design factors** (e.g., strategy shifts, threat landscape) to ensure tailored relevance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COBIT**?

**Non-compliance with COBIT carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a voluntary framework.** Indirect consequences include weakened EGIT, exposing organizations to unmitigated I&T risks, audit deficiencies, regulatory non-alignment (e.g., via poor MEA conformance), and failure to demonstrate value/risk optimization to stakeholders, potentially leading to operational failures or lost competitive advantage.

Can **COBIT** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COBIT 2019 explicitly supports mapping to other frameworks through its governance framework principles of alignment, openness, and conceptual consistency.** The core model (**40 objectives**) and components integrate with operational standards, enabling tailored governance systems via design factors and focus areas like cybersecurity or DevOps.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COBIT**?

**The first step to implement COBIT is to evaluate stakeholder needs and enterprise context using the goals cascade to map to enterprise goals (EGs) and alignment goals (AGs).** This informs **11 design factors** for scoping the governance system, followed by a current-state capability assessment (levels 0-5) per **APO02 Managed Strategy** practices.

FISMA vs COBIT

Standards Comparison

FISMA

Mandatory

2014

U.S. federal law for risk-based cybersecurity management

COBIT

Voluntary

2019

Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

Quick Verdict

FISMA mandates risk-based security for US federal systems via NIST RMF, while COBIT provides voluntary IT governance framework. Agencies comply with FISMA legally; enterprises adopt COBIT for strategic alignment and maturity.

Cybersecurity

FISMA

Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandates NIST RMF 7-step risk management process
Requires continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization
Enforces FIPS 199 impact-based system categorization
Applies to federal agencies and contractors
Features OMB, DHS oversight and IG assessments

IT Governance

COBIT

COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

11 design factors for tailored governance systems
40 objectives in 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
Goals cascade linking stakeholders to IT outcomes
Separation of governance from management roles

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

FISMA Details

What It Is

Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It modernizes the 2002 act, mandating agency-wide security programs via NIST RMF 7-step process: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.

Key Components

NIST SP 800-53 controls, FIPS 199 categorization (Low/Moderate/High impact)
Continuous monitoring, SSPs, POA&Ms, ATOs
Oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA, IGs with annual metrics
Compliance model: independent IG evaluations, maturity levels 1-5

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for federal agencies/contractors; reduces breach risks, enables market access (e.g., FedRAMP). Builds resilience, efficiency, trust; avoids fines, debarment, operational disruptions.

Implementation Overview

Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorize/select controls, implement/assess/authorize, monitor. Applies to agencies, contractors, cloud providers; requires audits, automation for large/complex orgs. (178 words)

COBIT Details

What It Is

COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies, is a comprehensive governance and management framework developed by ISACA for enterprise information and technology (I&T). Its primary purpose is to help organizations create value from I&T, manage risks, and optimize resources by translating stakeholder needs into actionable objectives. It employs a tailoring approach using design factors and a goals cascade for customized governance systems.

Key Components

40 governance and management objectives grouped into **five domainsEDM (Evaluate, Direct, Monitor), APO, BAI, DSS, MEA.
Six governance system principles and seven components (processes, structures, policies, etc.).
CMMI-based performance management with capability levels 0-5.
No formal certification; compliance via self-assessments and audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns I&T with business strategy for value delivery.
Supports compliance (e.g., SOX, GDPR mappings) and risk optimization.
Enhances assurance, auditability, and stakeholder trust.
Enables digital transformation and competitive agility.

Implementation Overview

Phased: assess gaps, design via toolkit, pilot objectives, measure capabilities.
Applies to all sizes/industries; training via ISACA certifications essential.
Focuses on tailoring, not full adoption; audits for assurance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about FISMA and COBIT

FISMA FAQ

COBIT FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats

Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs

Discover NIST 800-53 ROI in private sector: control families like RA, SI, SR reduce median breach costs from $100K to under $50K. Get benchmarks to prioritize i

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SOC 2 vs SAMA CSF

Compare SOC 2 vs SAMA CSF: Voluntary US audit for SaaS security (TSC focus) vs mandatory Saudi finance framework (maturity model, governance). Key diffs, implementation tips. Secure compliance now!

Australian Privacy Act vs GDPR UK

Explore Australian Privacy Act vs UK GDPR: APPs & NDB vs principles, rights & DPIAs. Key differences in scope, breaches, fines & reforms for global compliance. Dive in!

ENERGY STAR vs HITRUST CSF

Compare ENERGY STAR vs HITRUST CSF: Energy efficiency certification meets cybersecurity assurance. Discover differences, compliance strategies, and ROI benefits for regulated industries. Optimize now!

FISMA

COBIT

Quick Verdict

FISMA

Key Features

COBIT

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

FISMA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

COBIT Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

FISMA FAQ

What is the primary objective of FISMA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FISMA?

Does FISMA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FISMA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FISMA?

An FISMA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FISMA?

COBIT FAQ

What is the primary objective of COBIT?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COBIT?

Does COBIT require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COBIT be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COBIT?

Can COBIT be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COBIT?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats

NIST 800-53 Private Sector ROI Reality Check: Isolating Control Family Impacts on 2024 Breach Costs

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SOC 2 vs SAMA CSF

Australian Privacy Act vs GDPR UK

ENERGY STAR vs HITRUST CSF