Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. federal law mandating risk-based cybersecurity programs

    VS

    ISO 27017

    Voluntary
    2015

    International code of practice for cloud security controls.

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates risk-based security for US federal agencies via NIST RMF, while ISO 27017 provides voluntary cloud-specific controls extending ISO 27001 globally. Agencies comply with FISMA legally; organizations adopt ISO 27017 for cloud assurance and procurement trust.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based NIST RMF 7-step lifecycle process
    • Continuous monitoring and ongoing system authorization
    • FIPS 199 impact-based system categorization
    • Tailored NIST SP 800-53 security controls
    • Annual IG independent evaluations and metrics
    Cloud Security

    ISO 27017

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud security

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
    • Introduces 7 cloud-specific CLD security controls
    • Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud
    • Addresses multi-tenancy and VM segregation risks
    • Enables customer monitoring of cloud services

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information systems. It mandates agency-wide information security programs using NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

    Key Components

    • NIST RMF 7 steps: Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor.
    • FIPS 199 categorization (Low/Moderate/High impact); NIST SP 800-53 controls (20 families).
    • Continuous monitoring, POA&Ms, SSPs; annual IG evaluations with maturity metrics aligned to NIST CSF.
    • Oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA, Congress.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, debarment, funding loss. Provides risk reduction, resilience, market access (e.g., FedRAMP). Builds trust, enables strategic cybersecurity alignment, differentiates vendors.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased RMF approach: governance/inventory, categorize/select controls, implement/assess/authorize, continuous monitoring. Applies to agencies, contractors handling federal data; high complexity for large/federated orgs. Requires independent audits, no formal certification but ongoing ATOs.

    ISO 27017 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is an international code of practice providing guidance on information security controls for cloud services. It extends ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific implementations, targeting shared responsibilities between cloud service providers (CSPs) and customers (CSCs). Adopts a risk-based approach within ISO 27001 ISMS frameworks, applicable to IaaS, PaaS, SaaS across public, private, hybrid clouds.

    Key Components

    • Cloud-specific guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls
    • 7 additional CLD controls (e.g., shared responsibilities CLD.6.3.1, VM segregation CLD.9.5.1)
    • Built on ISO 27001 baseline
    • No standalone certification; integrated into ISO 27001 audits

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Addresses cloud risks like multi-tenancy, virtualization
    • Meets procurement, regulatory demands (e.g., GDPR alignment)
    • Enhances risk management, stakeholder trust
    • Provides competitive differentiation for CSPs/CSCs

    Implementation Overview

    • Extend existing ISO 27001 ISMS via risk assessment, control mapping
    • Key steps: define responsibilities, configure monitoring/segregation, audit preparation
    • Suits all sizes/industries globally; joint audits 9-12 months

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FISMA
    Federal info systems, NIST RMF, continuous monitoring
    ISO 27017
    Cloud-specific security controls, shared responsibility

    Industry

    FISMA
    US federal agencies, contractors, government-focused
    ISO 27017
    Global CSPs, customers, all cloud-using organizations

    Nature

    FISMA
    US federal law, mandatory for agencies, NIST-based
    ISO 27017
    Voluntary ISO guidance, extends 27001/27002

    Testing

    FISMA
    Annual IG audits, continuous monitoring, RMF assessments
    ISO 27017
    Integrated in ISO 27001 audits, no standalone cert

    Penalties

    FISMA
    Contract loss, debarment, IG reports, funding cuts
    ISO 27017
    No legal penalties, loss of certification/trust

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and ISO 27017

    FISMA FAQ

    ISO 27017 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages