Standards Comparison

    FISMA

    Mandatory
    2014

    U.S. law for risk-based federal cybersecurity management

    VS

    J-SOX

    Mandatory
    2008

    Japanese regulation for internal controls over financial reporting

    Quick Verdict

    FISMA mandates cybersecurity for US federal systems via NIST RMF, while J-SOX requires Japanese listed firms to assess financial reporting controls annually. Agencies ensure resilience; companies build investor trust and avoid penalties through rigorous governance.

    Cybersecurity

    FISMA

    Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)
    • Requires continuous monitoring and diagnostics
    • Enforces FIPS 199 system impact categorization
    • Demands annual IG independent assessments
    • Extends requirements to federal contractors
    Financial Reporting

    J-SOX

    Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Management assessment of ICFR effectiveness
    • External auditor review of management reports
    • Principles-based risk scoping with COSO
    • Explicit focus on IT general controls
    • Applies to listed firms and subsidiaries

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    FISMA Details

    What It Is

    The Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014 is a U.S. federal law establishing a risk-based framework for protecting federal information and systems. It modernizes the 2002 act, mandating agency-wide security programs focused on confidentiality, integrity, and availability via the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF).

    Key Components

    • **7-step RMFPrepare, Categorize (FIPS 199), Select/Implement/Assess (NIST SP 800-53), Authorize, Monitor.
    • Continuous diagnostics, incident reporting, and oversight by OMB, DHS/CISA, IGs.
    • Metrics-aligned maturity model (Levels 1-5) with core domains like risk management and supply chain security.
    • Compliance via ATO and annual reporting.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Federal agencies and contractors must comply to avoid penalties, debarment, and funding loss. It reduces breach risks, enables market access (e.g., FedRAMP), boosts resilience, and builds stakeholder trust through evidence-based security.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased RMF application: governance/inventory, control deployment, assessments, continuous monitoring. Applies to agencies, contractors; suits all sizes via tailoring. Requires IG audits, POA&Ms; 12-24 months typical.

    J-SOX Details

    What It Is

    J-SOX (Japanese Sarbanes-Oxley) refers to the internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) provisions of Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), promulgated in 2006 and effective from April 2008. It is a mandatory regulation for listed companies, requiring management assessment of ICFR effectiveness with external auditor review. The approach is principles-based and risk-focused, emphasizing COSO framework components plus explicit IT response.

    Key Components

    • Five COSO components (Control Environment, Risk Assessment, Control Activities, Information & Communication, Monitoring) augmented by IT Response.
    • Entity-level, process-level, and IT general controls (ITGCs) like access, change management.
    • No fixed control count; risk-based scoping of key controls.
    • Compliance via annual internal control reports audited by external firms.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal compliance for ~3,800 listed firms and subsidiaries.
    • Enhances financial reporting reliability, investor trust, reduces restatement risks.
    • Strategic benefits: operational efficiency, IT governance, audit cost savings via automation.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Phased approachgovernance, scoping, design, testing, reporting, monitoring.
    • Targets listed companies in Japan; multinationals align with global ops.
    • Requires documentation, testing, remediation; auditor attestation essential. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    FISMA
    Federal info systems cybersecurity
    J-SOX
    Financial reporting internal controls

    Industry

    FISMA
    US federal agencies, contractors
    J-SOX
    Japanese listed companies, subsidiaries

    Nature

    FISMA
    Mandatory US federal law
    J-SOX
    Mandatory Japanese securities law

    Testing

    FISMA
    Continuous monitoring, RMF assessments
    J-SOX
    Annual management assessment, auditor review

    Penalties

    FISMA
    Contract loss, debarment, IG reports
    J-SOX
    Fines, listing suspension, criminal liability

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about FISMA and J-SOX

    FISMA FAQ

    J-SOX FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages