Standards Comparison

    GDPR

    Mandatory
    2016

    EU regulation for comprehensive personal data protection

    VS

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    Voluntary
    2023

    International standard for AI management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    GDPR mandates personal data protection for EU residents globally with hefty fines, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 offers voluntary AI governance certification. Companies adopt GDPR for legal compliance, ISO 42001 for ethical AI trust and market edge.

    Data Privacy

    GDPR

    Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - General Data Protection Regulation

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Extraterritorial reach applies to non-EU entities targeting EU data
    • Accountability principle requires demonstrating compliance through DPIAs and ROPAs
    • Fines up to 4% of global annual turnover for violations
    • Enhanced data subject rights including erasure and portability
    • Mandatory 72-hour personal data breach notifications
    AI Management

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management Systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • PDCA framework for AI lifecycle governance
    • Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
    • Annex A with 38 AI-specific controls
    • Third-party and supply chain risk management
    • Seamless integration with ISO 27001/9001

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    GDPR Details

    What It Is

    Regulation (EU) 2016/679, known as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), is a directly applicable EU regulation protecting natural persons' personal data. It modernizes privacy for the digital age, replacing the 1995 Directive, with extraterritorial scope applying globally to EU data processors. Employs a risk-based, accountability-driven approach with seven core principles: lawfulness, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity, and accountability.

    Key Components

    • Seven foundational principles under Article 5
    • Comprehensive data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection)
    • Obligations like DPIAs, ROPAs, DPO appointment, 72-hour breach notifications
    • Enforcement via tiered fines up to €20M or 4% global turnover; no formal certification but ongoing compliance demonstration

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU data processing to avoid severe penalties, enhances risk management, builds stakeholder trust, boosts reputation as privacy leader, and supports global compliance amid Brussels Effect influencing laws like LGPD, CCPA.

    Implementation Overview

    Involves gap analysis, policy updates, training, DPO hiring, technical safeguards. Applies to all sizes processing EU data, especially high-risk/large-scale. Two-year transition originally; requires continuous audits, no central certification but DPA oversight. SMEs face high burdens; multinationals adopt worldwide.

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). This certifiable framework specifies requirements to establish, implement, maintain, and improve responsible AI governance using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) common to ISO management systems. It applies universally to organizations developing, providing, or using AI, addressing lifecycle risks like bias, transparency, and ethics.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, and improvement.
    • **Annex A38 AI-specific controls across 10 themes (e.g., data governance, third-party risks).
    • Mandatory AI Impact Assessments (AIIAs) for high-risk systems.
    • Built on ISO 31000 risk management; enables third-party certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates AI risks (e.g., model drift, discrimination) and ensures regulatory alignment (EU AI Act).
    • Builds stakeholder trust, enhances reputation, and drives competitive differentiation.
    • Integrates with ISO 27001/9001 for cost efficiencies and innovation opportunities.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy development, risk assessments, training, audits.
    • Suited for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical with tools like ISMS.online.
    • Requires leadership commitment; certification via accredited auditors recommended. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    GDPR
    Personal data protection and privacy
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    AI management systems and lifecycle governance

    Industry

    GDPR
    All sectors processing EU data globally
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    All industries using/developing AI worldwide

    Nature

    GDPR
    Mandatory EU regulation with fines
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    GDPR
    DPIAs for high-risk, DPA audits
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    AIIAs, internal audits, third-party certification

    Penalties

    GDPR
    Up to 4% global turnover fines
    ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    Loss of certification, no legal fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about GDPR and ISO/IEC 42001:2023

    GDPR FAQ

    ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages