REACH
EU regulation for chemical registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
Quick Verdict
REACH mandates chemical risk management for EU market access, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 provides voluntary AIMS certification for responsible AI. Companies adopt REACH to avoid penalties and bans; ISO 42001 for trust, compliance, and innovation edge.
REACH
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 on REACH
Key Features
- Shifts burden of proof to industry for risks
- 1 tonne/year registration threshold per legal entity
- Authorisation for SVHCs drives substitution
- EU-wide restrictions on unacceptable risks
- Mandatory supply-chain SVHC communication duties
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System
Key Features
- PDCA-based framework for AI governance
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk AI
- 38 Annex A controls for AI-specific risks
- Full AI lifecycle management from design to decommissioning
- Integration with ISO 27001 and other management systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
REACH Details
What It Is
REACH (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) is a directly applicable EU regulation establishing a comprehensive framework for managing chemical risks. Its primary purpose is protecting human health and the environment through industry-led identification of substance properties, risks, and safe-use measures. Scope covers substances, mixtures, and articles; approach is risk-based with tonnage-triggered data requirements.
Key Components
- Four pillars: Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, Restriction.
- 17 technical annexes detailing dossiers, SDS, lists (e.g., Annex XIV SVHCs, Annex XVII restrictions).
- Core principles: industry responsibility, substitution promotion, data-sharing via consortia.
- No certification; compliance via ECHA dossier submission and national enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal obligation for EU market access; avoids fines, seizures, market bans. Enhances risk management, supply-chain transparency, innovation via safer alternatives. Builds stakeholder trust, supports ESG goals, provides competitive edge in chemical-dependent sectors.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, substance inventory, dossier preparation (IUCLID), supply-chain SDS/communication, monitoring updates. Applies to manufacturers/importers/downstream users across industries; ongoing audits, no central certification but Member State inspections required. (178 words)
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS), a certifiable framework to govern AI responsibly. It specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving AIMS using Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology and High-Level Structure (HLS), addressing AI lifecycle risks like bias and transparency.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
- **Annex A38 AI-specific controls (e.g., data governance, third-party risks)
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments (AIIAs) for high-risk systems
- Annex B/C guidance; integrates with ISO 31000 risk management
Why Organizations Use It
Drives ethical AI, mitigates risks (bias, drift), ensures EU AI Act alignment, builds trust, enables innovation. Early adopters like Microsoft gain certification credibility, procurement advantages, insurance savings.
Implementation Overview
Phased gap analysis, policy development, training, audits. Universal applicability (all sizes/sectors); voluntary certification via accredited bodies (6-12 months typical, faster with ISO 27001 integration).
Key Differences
| Aspect | REACH | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction | AI management systems lifecycle governance and risks |
| Industry | Chemicals, manufacturing, all EU importers/exporters | All sectors using/developing AI globally |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with national enforcement | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Dossier submissions, compliance checks by ECHA/MSAs | Third-party audits, AI impact assessments, PDCA reviews |
| Penalties | Fines, product seizures, market bans by Member States | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about REACH and ISO/IEC 42001:2023
REACH FAQ
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats
Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!
Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers
Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 56002 vs ISO 41001
ISO 56002 vs ISO 41001: Compare innovation & facility mgmt systems. HLS/PDCA frameworks align leadership, risks & ops for strategic gains. Discover differences, integration tips—boost performance now!
J-SOX vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Explore J-SOX vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023—Japan's principles-based ICFR vs AI governance std. IT focus, risks, compliance for execs. Unlock key diffs now!
ISO 22000 vs FedRAMP
Discover ISO 22000 vs FedRAMP: Compare food safety FSMS standards with federal cloud security baselines. Uncover differences, benefits & compliance paths now.