GLBA
U.S. law mandating financial privacy notices and safeguards
ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility
Quick Verdict
GLBA mandates privacy notices and security programs for financial institutions protecting NPI, while ISO 26000 provides voluntary guidance on broad social responsibility principles for all organizations. Companies adopt GLBA for legal compliance; ISO 26000 for strategic sustainability and stakeholder trust.
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Mandates privacy notices and opt-out for NPI sharing
- Requires written information security program with safeguards
- Designates Qualified Individual for security oversight
- Imposes 30-day FTC breach notification for 500+ consumers
- Applies broadly to activity-based financial institutions
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Seven principles underpinning all SR activities
- Seven core subjects for comprehensive coverage
- Non-certifiable guidance applicable to all organizations
- Stakeholder engagement for issue prioritization
- Integration throughout governance and operations
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GLBA Details
What It Is
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), enacted in 1999, is a U.S. federal regulation establishing privacy and security standards for financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). It uses a dual-track, risk-based approach via the Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313) and Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314), plus pretexting protections.
Key Components
- **Privacy RuleInitial/annual notices, opt-out for nonaffiliated sharing.
- **Safeguards RuleComprehensive security program with administrative, technical, physical safeguards; Qualified Individual; annual board reporting; breach notification for 500+ consumers.
- Built on risk assessments, vendor oversight, testing (penetration, vulnerability scans).
- Enforced by FTC for non-banks; no certification, but compliance via audits/enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate for financial entities (broad scope: lenders, tax firms, auto dealers).
- Mitigates penalties ($100K/violation), breaches, reputational harm.
- Builds trust, enables secure data flows, differentiates in competitive markets.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/data mapping, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes (exemptions for <5K customers); FTC-focused for non-banks; ongoing audits, no formal certification.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is an international guidance standard on social responsibility, providing a framework for organizations to address impacts on society and the environment. Its primary purpose is to promote sustainable development through transparent, ethical behavior. The approach is holistic, principles-based, emphasizing stakeholder engagement and contextual prioritization.
Key Components
- Seven **core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- Seven **principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- No certifiable requirements; focuses on integration rather than audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances risk management, reputation, and stakeholder trust.
- Aligns with SDGs, OECD, GRI for credibility.
- Drives operational resilience, talent retention, market access without certification burdens.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assess materiality, engage stakeholders, integrate into governance/operations.
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors globally.
- No certification; self-assessment, transparent reporting via ISO tools.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GLBA | ISO 26000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer financial privacy and data security | Broad social responsibility across 7 core subjects |
| Industry | Financial institutions (broad, activity-based) | All organizations, all sectors worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory U.S. federal regulation with enforcement | Voluntary non-certifiable guidance standard |
| Testing | Risk assessments, penetration testing, audits | Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, no formal tests |
| Penalties | Civil penalties up to $100k per violation | No legal penalties, reputational risks only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GLBA and ISO 26000
GLBA FAQ
ISO 26000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Measuring CIS Controls v8.1 in the Real World: KPIs, Dashboards, and Automated Evidence for Continuous Assurance
Master CIS Controls v8.1 measurement with essential KPIs, executive-ready dashboards, and automated evidence collection for continuous assurance. Make complianc

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance
Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIS2 vs UL Certification
Compare NIS2 vs UL Certification: EU cyber directive boosts risk mgmt, reporting & fines vs UL's safety tests, marks & inspections. Achieve compliance now!
NIST 800-53 vs EN 1090
Compare NIST 800-53 cybersecurity controls vs EN 1090 structural standards. Discover baselines, RMF vs FPC, execution classes for risk & compliance mastery. Optimize now!
COBIT vs ISO 13485
Discover COBIT vs ISO 13485: IT governance meets medtech QMS. Unpack differences, synergies for compliance, risk mgmt & value delivery. Optimize your strategy now!