GLBA
U.S. federal law for financial privacy and safeguards
ISO 27701
International standard for privacy information management systems.
Quick Verdict
GLBA mandates privacy notices and safeguards for US financial firms handling NPI, enforced by FTC with heavy penalties. ISO 27701 offers voluntary global PIMS certification for PII processors, providing auditable privacy governance. Firms adopt GLBA for compliance, ISO 27701 for assurance.
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Requires initial and annual privacy notices with opt-out rights
- Mandates comprehensive Safeguards Rule security program
- Applies to broad range of non-bank financial entities
- Designates Qualified Individual for program oversight
- Imposes 30-day FTC breach notification requirement
ISO 27701
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management
Key Features
- Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) framework
- Controller and processor-specific controls (Annex A/B)
- Risk-based assessments and DPIAs
- GDPR and ISO 27001 alignments/mappings
- Auditable certification for PII accountability
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GLBA Details
What It Is
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1999. It establishes privacy and security standards for financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). Primary purpose: protect consumer financial data through transparency and safeguards. Adopts a risk-based approach via Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule.
Key Components
- Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313): notices, opt-outs for nonaffiliated sharing.
- Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314): written security program with administrative, technical, physical controls.
- **Pretexting provisionsanti-social engineering protections. Built on interconnected privacy-security framework; no certification, but FTC enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for financial institutions (banks, non-banks like tax firms). Mitigates enforcement risks (fines up to $100K/violation), enhances trust, reduces breach impacts. Builds resilience, vendor oversight; strategic for reputation in finance.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping, risk assessment, controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing. Applies to broad entities handling NPI; U.S.-focused. Requires audits, board reporting, no formal certification.
ISO 27701 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is an international standard providing requirements and guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It focuses on managing personally identifiable information (PII) lifecycle for controllers and processors, using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 extend management system requirements for privacy.
- Annex A (controllers) and Annex B (processors) specify privacy controls.
- Mappings to GDPR (Annex D) and other standards.
- Certification via accredited bodies, often integrated with ISO 27001 audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates accountability for global privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA).
- Mitigates regulatory fines, breach risks, and vendor exclusions.
- Builds trust, differentiates in B2B markets, harmonizes compliance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: discover/scope, design/plan, implement/operate, validate/improve.
- Involves PII inventory, DPIAs, DSR processes, training.
- Suits all sizes/industries handling PII; voluntary certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GLBA | ISO 27701 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer financial privacy and security (NPI) | Privacy management system (PII lifecycle) |
| Industry | Financial institutions (broad, US-focused) | All sectors processing PII (global) |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law with FTC enforcement | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Risk assessments, penetration testing, board reports | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Up to $100k per violation, criminal penalties | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GLBA and ISO 27701
GLBA FAQ
ISO 27701 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
COPPA vs EU AI Act
Unlock COPPA vs EU AI Act: U.S. kids' privacy law meets EU AI rules. Diffs, $170M fines, edtech tips. Safeguard data—master compliance now!
WELL vs EU AI Act
Explore WELL vs EU AI Act: Health-focused buildings meet AI risk regulation. Key differences, compliance strategies for innovative, people-first projects. Compare now!
K-PIPA vs FISMA
Discover K-PIPA vs FISMA: South Korea's consent-centric privacy powerhouse vs US federal risk-based cybersecurity. Key diffs in CPOs, 72h breaches, 3% fines. Master compliance now!