GLBA
U.S. law for financial privacy notices and safeguards
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC rules for cybersecurity incident and governance disclosures
Quick Verdict
GLBA mandates privacy notices and security programs for financial firms protecting NPI, while U.S. SEC rules require public companies to disclose material cyber incidents within 4 days and annual governance. Firms adopt GLBA for compliance, SEC for investor transparency.
GLBA
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Key Features
- Mandates privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
- Requires comprehensive risk-based information security program
- Applies broadly to non-bank financial institutions
- Designates Qualified Individual with board reporting
- Imposes 30-day breach notification for 500+ consumers
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four business days for material incident disclosure
- Annual risk management and governance disclosures
- Board oversight and management role descriptions
- Inline XBRL structured data tagging
- Third-party risk processes inclusion
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GLBA Details
What It Is
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), enacted in 1999, is a U.S. federal regulation establishing privacy and security standards for financial institutions. Its primary purpose is protecting nonpublic personal information (NPI) through transparency and safeguards. GLBA uses a risk-based approach via the Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule.
Key Components
- **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Initial/annual notices, opt-out for nonaffiliated sharing.
- **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Written security program with administrative, technical, physical safeguards; Qualified Individual; annual board reports.
- **Pretexting provisionsAnti-social engineering protections. No formal certification; compliance via self-implementation, testing, enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
GLBA is mandatory for covered entities, reducing breach risks, ensuring regulatory compliance, building customer trust. Benefits include operational resilience, vendor oversight, competitive edge in financial services.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/NPI inventory, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing, monitoring. Applies to broad financial institutions (banks, non-banks); FTC enforces for non-banks. No certification, but expects documentation, audits.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) are federal regulations mandating standardized disclosures for public companies. They focus on timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and annual descriptions of risk management, strategy, and governance. The approach is materiality-based, aligning with securities law principles without bright-line thresholds.
Key Components
- **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material incidents within four business days.
- **Annual disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 covers risk processes, board oversight, and management roles.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data.
- Applies to all Exchange Act registrants, including FPIs via Forms 6-K and 20-F. No fixed controls; emphasizes processes and governance.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances investor protection via timely, comparable information. Mandatory for public filers to avoid enforcement. Improves risk integration, board accountability, and market efficiency. Builds stakeholder trust amid rising cyber threats.
Implementation Overview
- Cross-functional gap analysis, playbook development, process integration.
- Phased compliance: incidents from Dec 2023/June 2024; annual from Dec 2023. Applies to U.S. public companies; involves DCP enhancements, no external certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GLBA | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Privacy notices, security program for NPI | Cyber incident disclosure, risk governance |
| Industry | Financial institutions (broad non-banks) | Public companies (all SEC registrants) |
| Nature | Mandatory privacy/security regulation | Mandatory disclosure regulation |
| Testing | Risk assessments, penetration testing | No specific testing; governance disclosure |
| Penalties | Up to $100k per violation, imprisonment | Civil penalties, enforcement actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GLBA and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
GLBA FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST 800-53 vs ISO 21001
Compare NIST 800-53 vs ISO 21001: Security/privacy controls vs educational management systems. Uncover differences, mappings & strategies for compliance. Boost your framework choice now!
ISO 37301 vs ISO 56002
Compare ISO 37301 vs ISO 56002: Certifiable CMS for risk-based compliance mastery meets IMS guidance for innovation excellence. HLS-aligned benefits, pitfalls & roadmaps await!
NIST 800-171 vs APRA CPS 234
Explore NIST 800-171 vs APRA CPS 234: Key differences in CUI protection, board governance, third-party risks & compliance. Essential insights for global cyber resilience. Master now!