ISO 37301
Certifiable international standard for compliance management systems
ISO 56002
International guidance standard for innovation management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 37301 provides certifiable requirements for compliance management systems to manage risks and obligations systematically, while ISO 56002 offers guidance for innovation management systems to drive value creation. Companies adopt them for governance, risk reduction, and strategic capability.
ISO 37301
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems requirements
Key Features
- Certifiable requirements for compliance management systems
- High-Level Structure for ISO standards integration
- Risk-based planning of obligations and controls
- Leadership commitment and compliance culture emphasis
- Mandatory whistleblowing protections and channels
ISO 56002
ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance
Key Features
- PDCA cycle aligned management system structure
- Leadership commitment and policy establishment
- Portfolio management and uncertainty handling
- Performance evaluation with KPIs and audits
- Integration with HLS/HS ISO standards
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37301 Details
What It Is
ISO 37301:2021, titled Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance for use, is a certifiable international standard for establishing effective Compliance Management Systems (CMS). Replacing guidance-only ISO 19600, it employs a risk-based PDCA cycle within the ISO High-Level Structure (HLS), applicable to all organization sizes and sectors.
Key Components
- Leadership commitment, compliance policy, roles/responsibilities
- **Planningrisk assessments, objectives, controls for obligations
- **Support/Operationresources, competence, whistleblowing, third-party controls
- **Evaluation/Improvementmonitoring, audits, KPIs, corrective actions Follows HLS with 10 clauses; certification via accredited bodies like ANAB.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives compliance culture, reduces fines/reputational risks, supports ESG/SDGs. Enhances investor trust, integrates with ISO 9001/14001/27001. Provides certification for competitive edge, evidence in enforcement.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: context analysis, obligation registers, training, audits. Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; 3-year certification cycle with surveillance. Demands resources, cultural change; 2024 amendment adds climate action.
ISO 56002 Details
What It Is
ISO 56002:2019, titled Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance, is an international guidance standard from ISO/TC 279. It provides a framework for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and improve an Innovation Management System (IMS). The primary purpose is to enable systematic value creation through innovation across all organization types, sizes, and sectors. It follows a PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with other ISO standards.
Key Components
- Seven core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, enabling culture, etc.
- No prescriptive controls; focuses on tailored processes like portfolio management and uncertainty handling.
- Guidance only; conformity via self-assessment or third-party audits, not formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives strategic innovation governance and reduces 'innovation theater'.
- Enhances competitiveness, risk management, and stakeholder trust.
- Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001 for efficiency.
- No legal mandate; adopted for business resilience and growth.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: diagnosis, design, pilot, scale, sustain.
- Involves gap analysis, policy development, training, KPIs, audits.
- Applicable universally; suits established organizations best.
- No mandatory certification; optional assurance via ISO 56004.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37301 | ISO 56002 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance obligations, risks, culture, whistleblowing | Innovation processes, portfolio, value creation |
| Industry | All sectors, sizes, global | All sectors, sizes, global |
| Nature | Certifiable requirements standard | Guidance-only standard |
| Testing | Accredited certification audits, 3-year cycle | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No certification or penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37301 and ISO 56002
ISO 37301 FAQ
ISO 56002 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs REACH
NIST CSF vs REACH: Compare cybersecurity risk framework with EU chemicals regulation. Key differences, benefits & strategies for compliance & risk mgmt. Discover now!
ISO 26000 vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare ISO 26000 vs Australian Privacy Act: Discover key differences in SR guidance & privacy principles. Align ESG, human rights & data security for compliance—explore now!
PIPL vs NERC CIP
Compare PIPL vs NERC CIP: China's GDPR-like privacy law vs US grid cybersecurity standards. Master compliance risks, strategies & implementation for global ops. Dive in now!