GMP
Regulatory standards for pharmaceutical manufacturing quality control
BRC
Global standard for food safety in manufacturing
Quick Verdict
GMP enforces pharmaceutical manufacturing controls via regulations for patient safety worldwide, while BRC is a voluntary food safety certification with HACCP and audits for retailer supply chains. Companies adopt GMP for legal compliance; BRC for market access.
GMP
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP/cGMP)
Key Features
- Independent Quality Control Unit authority
- Quality Risk Management proportionality
- Comprehensive documentation traceability backbone
- Validated processes prevent contamination
- Continual improvement via CAPA cycle
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety
Key Features
- HACCP-based food safety plan requirements
- Senior management commitment and culture plan
- Fundamental non-negotiable control clauses
- Expanded environmental monitoring programs
- Unannounced audit options for grading
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GMP Details
What It Is
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP/cGMP) is a regulatory framework enforcing minimum standards for manufacturing controls in pharmaceuticals, biologics, and related products. Its primary purpose is ensuring consistent production meeting quality, safety, and efficacy criteria through preventive systems rather than end-testing alone. Scope spans facilities, equipment, personnel, processes, documentation, and distribution. Key approach is risk-based via Quality Risk Management (QRM) and Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS).
Key Components
- **5 Ps pillarsPeople, Premises, Processes, Procedures, Products.
- Core elements: independent Quality Control Unit, validated processes, ALCOA++ data integrity, CAPA, change control.
- Built on ICH Q9/Q10, FDA 21 CFR 210/211, EU EudraLex Vol. 4, WHO GMP.
- Compliance via inspections, no central certification but enforcement actions.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for market access; reduces recalls, liability. Strategic benefits: supply reliability, efficiency, innovation enablement. Builds regulator, patient trust; prevents historical tragedies like Elixir Sulfanilamide.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, Validation Master Plan, training, qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ), audits. Applies to all sizes in pharma/biologics globally; ongoing inspections required.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based food safety plans, and robust prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, internal audits) are non-negotiable.
- Built on risk assessments, environmental monitoring, and root cause analysis.
- Annual audits with grading (AA/A/B/C/D, + for unannounced).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandated by retailers for market access and supply chain trust.
- Reduces recalls via controls on allergens, pathogens, labelling.
- Demonstrates due diligence, GFSI recognition, operational resilience.
- Enhances reputation, efficiencies, insurance terms.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, mock audits.
- Applies to manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical.
- Requires certification body audits, continuous improvement.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GMP | BRC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Pharma manufacturing controls, facilities, processes, documentation | Food safety management, HACCP, site standards, personnel |
| Industry | Pharmaceuticals, biologics, APIs globally | Food manufacturing, packaging, pet food worldwide |
| Nature | Regulatory requirements, legally enforceable | Voluntary third-party certification standard |
| Testing | Process validation, equipment qualification, inspections | Annual audits, internal audits, unannounced options |
| Penalties | Warning letters, recalls, seizures, legal actions | Certification loss, grade downgrade, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GMP and BRC
GMP FAQ
BRC FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig

The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
K-PIPA vs IFS Food
Compare K-PIPA vs IFS Food: Decode Korea's strict data privacy law against global food safety standards. Master compliance strategies, slash risks & fines. Read now!
POPIA vs CSA
Navigate POPIA vs CSA: Compare South Africa's privacy law with key standards on data rights, security & enforcement. Unlock compliance strategies & avoid pitfalls. Optimize now!
LGPD vs J-SOX
Compare LGPD vs J-SOX: Brazil's GDPR-like data law vs Japan's SOX for financial controls. Master compliance risks, fines up to 2% revenue, & strategies for multinationals. Dive in now!