Standards Comparison

    GMP

    Mandatory
    1963

    Regulatory framework for consistent manufacturing quality control

    VS

    ISO 17025

    Voluntary
    2017

    International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

    Quick Verdict

    GMP ensures manufacturing consistency and patient safety in pharma and food via enforced controls, while ISO 17025 accredits labs for competent, impartial testing. Companies adopt GMP for regulatory compliance and market access; ISO 17025 for credible, globally accepted results.

    Manufacturing Quality

    GMP

    Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Independent quality unit oversight for batch release
    • Risk-based Quality Risk Management (QRM) integration
    • Validated processes and equipment qualification requirements
    • Comprehensive documentation ensuring data integrity (ALCOA+)
    • Facility design preventing contamination and mix-ups
    Laboratory Quality

    ISO 17025

    ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for testing laboratories

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Impartiality and confidentiality safeguards
    • Personnel competence lifecycle management
    • Metrological traceability and uncertainty evaluation
    • Method validation and proficiency testing
    • Risk-based process and management requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    GMP Details

    What It Is

    Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) are enforceable regulatory frameworks, including FDA 21 CFR Parts 210/211, EU EudraLex Volume 4, and WHO GMP, establishing minimum standards for pharmaceutical manufacturing. They ensure products are consistently produced to quality specifications through preventive controls rather than end-testing alone. Core approach is risk-based via Quality Risk Management (QRM) and Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS).

    Key Components

    • **5 PsPeople, Premises, Processes, Procedures, Products.
    • PQS elements: CAPA, change control, management review.
    • Documentation (SOPs, batch records), validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), data integrity (ALCOA+).
    • Independent Quality Control Unit or Qualified Person (QP) oversight. Compliance via inspections, no central certification but regional enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal mandates protect market access; reduces recalls, liabilities. Strategic benefits: supply reliability, efficiency, innovation enablement. Builds stakeholder trust, enhances reputation in global supply chains.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, Validation Master Plan, training, qualification, audits. Applies to pharma/biologics manufacturers globally; scales by size/risk. Involves eQMS, supplier audits; ongoing via internal inspections.

    ISO 17025 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 17025:2017, titled General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, is an international accreditation standard. It specifies requirements for competence, impartiality, and consistent operation, focusing on technical validity of results through risk-based thinking.

    Key Components

    • Eight main clauses: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource (personnel, facilities, equipment, traceability), process (methods, sampling, uncertainty, reporting), and management system requirements (Option A/B).
    • Emphasizes metrological traceability, measurement uncertainty, method validation, and proficiency testing.
    • Built on performance-based principles aligned with ISO 9001.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Ensures global acceptance of results via ILAC mutual recognition.
    • Meets regulatory/supply chain demands; mitigates risks of rejected data.
    • Builds trust, enables market access, reduces rework, enhances efficiency.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased PDCA approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
    • Applies to labs of all sizes in testing/calibration; requires accreditation by bodies like UKAS/ANAB.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    GMP
    Manufacturing controls for consistent product quality
    ISO 17025
    Laboratory competence for testing/calibration validity

    Industry

    GMP
    Pharma, biologics, food, cosmetics globally
    ISO 17025
    Testing/calibration labs across industries worldwide

    Nature

    GMP
    Enforceable regulations with inspections/warnings
    ISO 17025
    Voluntary accreditation standard for competence

    Testing

    GMP
    Process validation, equipment qualification, audits
    ISO 17025
    Method validation, proficiency testing, uncertainty evaluation

    Penalties

    GMP
    Warning letters, recalls, fines, shutdowns
    ISO 17025
    Loss of accreditation, rejected results

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about GMP and ISO 17025

    GMP FAQ

    ISO 17025 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages