Standards Comparison

    GRI

    Voluntary
    2021

    Global framework for sustainability impact reporting

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

    Quick Verdict

    GRI enables global sustainability impact reporting for all organizations, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial entities. Companies adopt GRI for stakeholder transparency and CPS 234 to meet regulatory compliance and avoid penalties.

    Sustainability Reporting

    GRI

    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Impact-centric materiality prioritizing actual and potential impacts
    • Modular structure: Universal, Sector, and Topic Standards
    • Mandatory GRI Content Index for full traceability
    • Broad worker scope including contractors and supply chain
    • Reporting principles ensuring accuracy, balance, verifiability
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic testing and independent control assurance
    • Third-party capability assessment and controls
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    GRI Details

    What It Is

    GRI Standards is a voluntary, modular framework for sustainability reporting. Its primary purpose is to enable organizations to disclose significant economic, environmental, and social impacts on stakeholders. The core approach is impact materiality, requiring identification of actual and potential impacts via a structured process in GRI 3: Material Topics.

    Key Components

    • Universal Standards (GRI 1 Foundation, GRI 2 General Disclosures, GRI 3 Material Topics) for baseline requirements.
    • Sector Standards for high-impact industries like oil & gas, mining.
    • Topic Standards (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety, GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment) with specific disclosures.
    • Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; compliance via GRI Content Index.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., CSRD), risk management for HES impacts, and stakeholder trust. Enhances comparability, benchmarking, and access to capital.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: materiality assessment, data architecture, management disclosures, assurance. Applies globally to all sizes; no certification but external assurance recommended. Involves cross-functional teams, ESG platforms, supplier engagement.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties. The approach is risk-based, emphasizing proportionality to asset criticality and sensitivity.

    Key Components

    • Governance with Board ultimate accountability and defined roles.
    • Asset identification, classification, and commensurate controls across lifecycle.
    • Systematic testing, independent assurance, and incident response plans.
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents; 10-day for control weaknesses. No fixed control count; built on CIA triad principles with internal audit oversight.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory compliance avoids penalties, enforcement, and license risks.
    • Enhances operational resilience, customer trust, and third-party negotiations.
    • Reduces incident impacts, supports market access, and builds competitive edge.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; requires evidence-based assurance, no formal certification but APRA supervision.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    GRI
    Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security, cyber resilience for financial ops

    Industry

    GRI
    All industries worldwide, any organization size
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super)

    Nature

    GRI
    Voluntary global reporting framework
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement

    Testing

    GRI
    Internal verification, content index traceability
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent testing, internal audit required

    Penalties

    GRI
    Loss of credibility, no legal penalties
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, fines, license restrictions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about GRI and APRA CPS 234

    GRI FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages