GRI
Global framework for sustainability impact reporting
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
GRI enables global sustainability impact reporting for all organizations, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial entities. Companies adopt GRI for stakeholder transparency and CPS 234 to meet regulatory compliance and avoid penalties.
GRI
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards
Key Features
- Impact-centric materiality prioritizing actual and potential impacts
- Modular structure: Universal, Sector, and Topic Standards
- Mandatory GRI Content Index for full traceability
- Broad worker scope including contractors and supply chain
- Reporting principles ensuring accuracy, balance, verifiability
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic testing and independent control assurance
- Third-party capability assessment and controls
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
GRI Details
What It Is
GRI Standards is a voluntary, modular framework for sustainability reporting. Its primary purpose is to enable organizations to disclose significant economic, environmental, and social impacts on stakeholders. The core approach is impact materiality, requiring identification of actual and potential impacts via a structured process in GRI 3: Material Topics.
Key Components
- Universal Standards (GRI 1 Foundation, GRI 2 General Disclosures, GRI 3 Material Topics) for baseline requirements.
- Sector Standards for high-impact industries like oil & gas, mining.
- Topic Standards (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety, GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment) with specific disclosures.
- Built on principles like accuracy, balance, verifiability; compliance via GRI Content Index.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., CSRD), risk management for HES impacts, and stakeholder trust. Enhances comparability, benchmarking, and access to capital.
Implementation Overview
Phased: materiality assessment, data architecture, management disclosures, assurance. Applies globally to all sizes; no certification but external assurance recommended. Involves cross-functional teams, ESG platforms, supplier engagement.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties. The approach is risk-based, emphasizing proportionality to asset criticality and sensitivity.
Key Components
- Governance with Board ultimate accountability and defined roles.
- Asset identification, classification, and commensurate controls across lifecycle.
- Systematic testing, independent assurance, and incident response plans.
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents; 10-day for control weaknesses. No fixed control count; built on CIA triad principles with internal audit oversight.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids penalties, enforcement, and license risks.
- Enhances operational resilience, customer trust, and third-party negotiations.
- Reduces incident impacts, supports market access, and builds competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; requires evidence-based assurance, no formal certification but APRA supervision.
Key Differences
| Aspect | GRI | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people | Information security, cyber resilience for financial ops |
| Industry | All industries worldwide, any organization size | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Voluntary global reporting framework | Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Internal verification, content index traceability | Systematic independent testing, internal audit required |
| Penalties | Loss of credibility, no legal penalties | Regulatory sanctions, fines, license restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GRI and APRA CPS 234
GRI FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27018 vs CIS Controls
Compare ISO 27018 vs CIS Controls: Cloud PII privacy extension of 27001 vs 18 prioritized cyber safeguards. Boost compliance, reduce risks—choose wisely! Dive in now.
WEEE vs ISO 30301
Compare WEEE Directive & ISO 30301: e-waste rules vs records systems. Achieve EPR compliance, hit 65% targets, ensure audit-proof docs. Unlock strategies now!
OSHA vs CCPA
Compare OSHA safety standards vs CCPA privacy laws: Key differences, compliance tips, penalties & strategies. Safeguard your workplace & data—expert guide inside!