What is the primary objective of **GRI**?

**The primary objective of GRI is to provide a global common language for organizations to report their significant impacts on the economy, environment, and people.** GRI Standards enable transparency and accountability through a modular system of Universal Standards (GRI 1: Foundation 2021, GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021, GRI 3: Material Topics 2021), Sector Standards, and Topic Standards, emphasizing impact materiality over financial materiality alone.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GRI**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with GRI, as it is a voluntary framework.** However, it is professionally expected for large corporates, multinationals, and listed companies facing stakeholder demands, with 96% of G250 firms and 67% of N100 using GRI per KPMG 2020 data, especially in high-impact sectors like oil & gas and mining where Sector Standards apply.

Does **GRI** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**GRI does not require external audit or third-party certification.** It mandates verifiability through the GRI Content Index, which lists all disclosures, locations, omissions, and reasons (e.g., GRI 1 principles of accuracy, balance, verifiability), enabling optional independent assurance on disclosures like GRI 403-8 (OHS system coverage).

How often should an assessment for **GRI** be performed?

**GRI materiality assessments under GRI 3 must be performed ongoing, not confined to annual reporting cycles.** The four-step process—understand context, identify impacts, assess significance, prioritize—requires highest governance body oversight, with annual reporting of material topics via Disclosures 3-1, 3-2, and 3-3 per topic.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GRI**?

**Non-compliance with GRI carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect consequences include reputational damage, exclusion from investor screenings, procurement risks, and misalignment with regulations referencing GRI (e.g., CSRD), plus weakened verifiability and stakeholder trust without a GRI Content Index.

Can **GRI** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, GRI can and is routinely mapped to other international frameworks.** Its impact-centric design complements investor standards like SASB (financial materiality), with joint GRI-SASB guidance enabling combined use; mappings exist for ISSB, TCFD, and CDP, reducing duplication while serving broad stakeholders.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GRI**?

**The first step to implement GRI is to apply GRI 1: Foundation 2021 to understand "in accordance" requirements and reporting principles.** Then prepare GRI 2 general disclosures and conduct a GRI 3 materiality assessment, documenting the process (Disclosure 3-1), topics (3-2), and management approaches (3-3), followed by a GRI Content Index.

What is the primary objective of **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM's primary objective is to establish sound technology risk governance and cyber resilience through defence-in-depth and continuous IT process improvement to preserve confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of data and systems.** Issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore in January 2021, the Guidelines promote proportional practices across financial institutions (FIs) for risk identification, assessment, treatment, monitoring, and reporting (§4.1.4; Preface §1.4).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MAS TRM**?

**MAS TRM applies to all financial institutions (FIs) supervised by MAS, including banks, insurers, capital market intermediaries, payment service providers, and fintech sandbox participants.** Applicability is proportional to risk profile, service complexity, and technology use (§2.2); boards and senior management bear ultimate accountability (§3.1).

Does **MAS TRM** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**MAS TRM requires an independent internal audit function to assess TRM control effectiveness, governance, and risk management (§3.1.7; §15), but does not mandate external audits or third-party certifications.** FIs may engage external penetration testing (§13.2) or assurance as proportionate measures.

How often should an assessment for **MAS TRM** be performed?

**MAS TRM requires vulnerability assessments regularly commensurate with system criticality and exposure (§13.1.1), and penetration testing at least annually for internet-exposed systems or after major changes (§13.2.4).** DR plans must be reviewed annually (§8.2.2), with periodic cyber exercises (§13.3) and policy reviews (§3.2.1).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MAS TRM**?

**Non-compliance with MAS TRM can result in supervisory actions including fines (e.g., S$27.45 million across nine FIs for related lapses), license revocation, and executive prohibition orders.** MAS evaluates observance of the Guidelines' spirit during supervision (§2.2), leading to remediation directives and reputational harm.

Can **MAS TRM** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**MAS TRM can be mapped to frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0 for ERM integration and ISO 27001 for ISMS controls, aligning outcomes in governance, risk assessment, and cyber operations.** The Guidelines encourage incorporating industry standards (§3.2.1) while maintaining proportionality.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MAS TRM**?

**The first step is for the board to approve a technology risk appetite/tolerance statement and establish an independent TRM function (§3.1.7).** This sets governance tone, enabling asset inventories (§3.3) and risk framework development (§4.1).

GRI vs MAS TRM

Standards Comparison

GRI

Voluntary

2021

Global framework for impact-centric sustainability reporting

MAS TRM

Mandatory

2021

Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance.

Quick Verdict

GRI enables global sustainability impact reporting for all organizations, emphasizing materiality and disclosures. MAS TRM mandates technology risk management for Singapore FIs, focusing on cyber resilience and governance. Companies use GRI for stakeholder transparency; MAS TRM for regulatory compliance.

Sustainability Reporting

GRI

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Impact-based materiality prioritizing stakeholder effects
Modular system of Universal, Sector, Topic Standards
Mandatory Content Index for traceability and verifiability
Broad worker scope including contractors and supply chain
Interoperable with SASB, ISSB for dual reporting

Technology Risk Management

MAS TRM

MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Board and senior management accountability for TRM
Proportional implementation based on risk and complexity
Comprehensive third-party risk management requirements
Annual penetration testing for internet-facing systems
Integrated governance with ERM and risk registers

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

GRI Details

What It Is

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards is a modular sustainability reporting framework providing a global common language for disclosing economic, environmental, and social impacts. Its primary purpose is impact-centric materiality, requiring organizations to report significant actual and potential effects on stakeholders, using Universal Standards (GRI 1-3), Sector Standards, and Topic Standards like GRI 403 for occupational health and safety.

Key Components

**Universal StandardsFoundation (principles), General Disclosures, Material Topics.
**Topic StandardsSpecific metrics for issues like emissions, waste, OHS.
Over 30 Topic Standards; mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability.
Built on principles of accuracy, balance, verifiability; no certification, but assurance encouraged.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives accountability, regulatory alignment (e.g., CSRD), risk management, benchmarking. Enhances stakeholder trust, investor access, supply-chain resilience; voluntary yet widely adopted (73% of G250).

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: materiality assessment, data architecture, management disclosures, Content Index. Applies to all sizes/sectors globally; involves governance, stakeholder engagement, assurance readiness.

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

MAS TRM (Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines, January 2021) is a supervisory framework for financial institutions (FIs) to manage technology and cyber risks. It adopts a risk-based, proportional approach emphasizing governance, defence-in-depth, and continuous improvement to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data.

Key Components

15 sections covering governance, risk frameworks, SDLC, operations, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber operations, testing, and audit.
Core principles: board accountability, asset inventories, third-party oversight, secure-by-design, and independent assurance.
No fixed controls; compliance via supervisory review, no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for Singapore FIs to avoid fines, license actions.
Enhances resilience, reduces systemic risks, builds trust.
Supports ERM integration, innovation (AI/cloud), competitive edge.

Implementation Overview

Phased: governance, inventory, controls, testing, monitoring.
Applies to banks, insurers, fintechs; scales by size/risk.
Involves audits, metrics; 12-18 months typical for mid/large FIs.

Key Differences

Aspect	GRI	MAS TRM
Scope	Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people	Technology, cyber risks in financial IT operations
Industry	All sectors worldwide, universal applicability	Singapore financial institutions only
Nature	Voluntary global reporting framework	Supervisory guidelines with enforcement
Testing	Materiality assessments, content index verification	Penetration testing, vulnerability scans, DR tests
Penalties	Reputational damage, no legal penalties	Fines, license revocation, enforcement actions

Scope

GRI

Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people

MAS TRM

Technology, cyber risks in financial IT operations

Industry

GRI

All sectors worldwide, universal applicability

MAS TRM

Singapore financial institutions only

Nature

GRI

Voluntary global reporting framework

MAS TRM

Supervisory guidelines with enforcement

Testing

GRI

Materiality assessments, content index verification

MAS TRM

Penetration testing, vulnerability scans, DR tests

Penalties

GRI

Reputational damage, no legal penalties

MAS TRM

Fines, license revocation, enforcement actions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GRI and MAS TRM

GRI FAQ

MAS TRM FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers

Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Discover how compliance monitoring tools empower lean teams to automate real-time checks, ensure GDPR/HIPAA/SOC 2 compliance, and scale oversight efficiently. T

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COBIT vs GRI

Compare COBIT vs GRI: ISACA's IT governance powerhouse meets global sustainability standards. Uncover key differences in principles, domains, implementation, and HES compliance to optimize enterprise risk and ESG reporting. Discover now!

ISO 27018 vs ISO 41001

Discover ISO 27018 vs ISO 41001: Cloud PII privacy meets FM excellence. Compare scopes, controls & benefits for compliance. Unlock insights now!

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27017

Explore MLPS 2.0 vs ISO 27017: China's mandatory graded cybersecurity scheme meets global cloud controls. Uncover key gaps, synergies & strategies for compliance success.

GRI

MAS TRM

Quick Verdict

GRI

Key Features

MAS TRM

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

GRI Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

MAS TRM Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

GRI FAQ

What is the primary objective of GRI?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GRI?

Does GRI require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GRI be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GRI?

Can GRI be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GRI?

MAS TRM FAQ

What is the primary objective of MAS TRM?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with MAS TRM?

Does MAS TRM require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for MAS TRM be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with MAS TRM?

Can MAS TRM be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing MAS TRM?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

Scaling Compliance: How Modern Tools Transform Lean Teams into Regulatory Powerhouses

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COBIT vs GRI

ISO 27018 vs ISO 41001

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27017