ISO 27018
Code of practice for protecting PII in public cloud services
ISO 41001
International standard for facility management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 27018 provides cloud-specific PII privacy controls for CSPs as an ISO 27001 extension, while ISO 41001 establishes facility management systems for all organizations. Companies adopt them for compliance assurance, procurement advantage, and operational excellence in privacy and facilities.
ISO 27018
ISO/IEC 27018: Code of practice for PII protection in public clouds
Key Features
- Privacy-specific controls for public cloud PII processors
- Subprocessor transparency and location disclosure requirements
- Prohibits PII use for marketing without consent
- Breach notification obligations to PII controllers
- Supports data subject rights in multi-tenant environments
ISO 41001
ISO 41001:2018 Facility management — Management systems — Requirements
Key Features
- HLS alignment enables IMS integration
- Distinguishes FM from demand organizations
- Stakeholder requirement lifecycle management
- Risk planning includes continuity preparedness
- Operational service integration controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27018 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope covers cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows. It uses a risk-based approach, adding ~25-30 privacy controls to the ISMS framework.
Key Components
- Core areas: transparency, subprocessors, breach notification, data minimization, security safeguards.
- Built on principles: consent, purpose limitation, accountability, aligned with ISO 29100 and GDPR Article 28.
- Assessed via ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certification, documented in Statement of Applicability.
Why Organizations Use It
- Builds customer trust and accelerates procurement.
- Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA).
- Reduces risk in PII processing; aids cyber insurance.
- Differentiates CSPs in competitive markets.
Implementation Overview
- Layer onto existing ISO 27001 ISMS via gap analysis.
- Key activities: policy updates, subprocessor management, training, audits.
- Applies to CSPs of all sizes; annual surveillance audits required.
ISO 41001 Details
What It Is
ISO 41001:2018 — Facility management — Management systems — Requirements with guidance for use is an international certifiable standard for facility management systems (FMS). It specifies requirements to demonstrate effective, efficient FM delivery supporting demand organization objectives, interested parties' needs, and sustainability in competitive environments. Adopts ISO High-Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA cycle for interoperability.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: Context, Leadership, Planning, Support, Operation, Performance evaluation, Improvement.
- FM-specific: stakeholder mapping (4.2), risk/opportunity planning incl. continuity (6.1), service integration (8.3).
- Built on process approach; Annex A guidance.
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Strategic FM alignment, cost optimization, risk reduction.
- Meets tenders/contracts; enhances ESG/sustainability.
- Improves occupant wellbeing, operational resilience.
- Builds stakeholder trust, competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy/objectives, processes, audits.
- All org sizes/sectors; 6–24 months typical.
- Internal audits, management reviews required for certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27018 | ISO 41001 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | PII protection in public clouds for processors | Facility management systems for service delivery |
| Industry | Cloud service providers, all sectors globally | All organizations with facilities, non-sector specific |
| Nature | Voluntary code of practice, extends ISO 27001 | Voluntary certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | Assessed in ISO 27001 audits, annual surveillance | ISO 27001-style audits, stage 1/2, surveillance |
| Penalties | Loss of audit alignment, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27018 and ISO 41001
ISO 27018 FAQ
ISO 41001 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SOC 2 vs ISO 19600
Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 19600: SOC 2 audits data security for SaaS via Trust Criteria; ISO 19600 guides risk-based CMS for all orgs. Find your ideal compliance path!
ITIL vs GDPR
ITIL vs GDPR: Compare ITSM best practices with EU data rules. Align ITIL 4's SVS & 34 practices for GDPR compliance, risk reduction & value-driven services. Master integration now.
ISO 50001 vs ISO 27017
ISO 50001 vs ISO 27017: Energy management for efficiency gains vs cloud security controls. Cut costs, boost resilience—compare key differences & implementation now!