HIPAA
U.S. regulation for protecting health information privacy and security
FedRAMP
U.S. program standardizing federal cloud security authorization.
Quick Verdict
HIPAA mandates PHI protection for healthcare via Privacy/Security Rules, while FedRAMP authorizes secure cloud for federal agencies through NIST baselines. Healthcare adopts HIPAA for compliance; cloud providers pursue FedRAMP for government contracts.
HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Key Features
- Mandates risk analysis for scalable ePHI safeguards
- Enforces minimum necessary PHI uses and disclosures
- Requires 60-day breach notifications with risk assessment
- Imposes direct liability on business associates via BAAs
- Guarantees individual rights to PHI access and amendments
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
Key Features
- Reusable authorizations across federal agencies
- NIST SP 800-53 baselines at Low/Moderate/High levels
- Independent 3PAO security assessments
- Continuous monitoring with monthly deliverables
- Program and Agency authorization paths
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HIPAA Details
What It Is
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is a U.S. federal regulation establishing national standards for protecting individuals' health information. It comprises the Privacy Rule, Security Rule, and Breach Notification Rule, applying a risk-based approach to govern use, disclosure, and safeguarding of protected health information (PHI) and electronic PHI (ePHI) for covered entities and business associates.
Key Components
- **Privacy RuleControls PHI uses/disclosures, minimum necessary principle, patient rights.
- **Security RuleAdministrative, physical, technical safeguards; 19 standards with required/addressable specs.
- **Breach Notification RulePresumption-of-breach model, four-factor risk assessment, 60-day notifications. Built on flexible, scalable governance; enforced via OCR audits, no formal certification but documentation required.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for healthcare providers, plans, clearinghouses; reduces breach risks, ensures patient trust, avoids penalties up to $2M annually. Strategic benefits include cyber resilience, vendor accountability, market differentiation.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess risks, build safeguards/BAAs/training, operate with monitoring/audits. Applies to U.S. healthcare entities of all sizes; ongoing compliance via documented risk management. (178 words)
FedRAMP Details
What It Is
FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide standardized framework for security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is to enable secure, reusable cloud adoption via NIST SP 800-53-based controls tailored to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High), reducing duplication across agencies.
Key Components
- Baselines with ~156-410 controls across 20 families, including LI-SaaS for low-risk SaaS.
- Core artifacts: System Security Plan (SSP), Security Assessment Report (SAR), Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M).
- Built on NIST standards; uses accredited 3PAOs for independent assessments.
- Compliance via Agency or Program Authorizations, with ongoing continuous monitoring.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal cloud providers to access government contracts.
- Enhances risk management, market access, and reuse across agencies.
- Builds stakeholder trust via rigorous, transparent security posture.
- Competitive edge in federal procurement and commercial sales.
Implementation Overview
- Phased process: categorization, documentation, 3PAO assessment, authorization.
- Applies to CSPs of all sizes targeting U.S. federal market.
- Requires 3PAO audits; timelines 10-19 months, costs $150k-$2M+.
Key Differences
| Aspect | HIPAA | FedRAMP |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | PHI privacy, security, breach notification for healthcare | Cloud security assessment, authorization, monitoring for federal |
| Industry | Healthcare covered entities, business associates, US-focused | Cloud providers serving US federal agencies, government-wide |
| Nature | Mandatory US regulation with OCR enforcement and penalties | Standardized authorization program, mandatory for federal cloud |
| Testing | Risk analysis, self-assessments, OCR audits and investigations | 3PAO independent assessments, annual reassessments, continuous monitoring |
| Penalties | Civil monetary penalties up to $2M annually, criminal prosecution | Loss of authorization, contract ineligibility, no direct fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HIPAA and FedRAMP
HIPAA FAQ
FedRAMP FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISA 95 vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare ISA 95 vs Australian Privacy Act: Crucial insights for manufacturers integrating ERP/MES securely while meeting privacy laws. Cut risks, ensure compliance. Dive in now!
PMBOK vs IATF 16949
Discover PMBOK vs IATF 16949: Compare project governance standards with automotive QMS excellence. Master tailoring, core tools & implementation for compliance wins. Elevate your strategy now!
NIS2 vs GLBA
Discover NIS2 vs GLBA: EU directive boosts cyber resilience; US law mandates financial data safeguards. Compare scopes, fines, reporting—master compliance now!