HIPAA
US regulation safeguarding health information privacy and security
IEC 62443
International standard for IACS cybersecurity frameworks
Quick Verdict
HIPAA mandates PHI privacy/security for US healthcare via rules and OCR enforcement, while IEC 62443 provides voluntary IACS cybersecurity standards for industrial OT. Organizations adopt HIPAA for legal compliance; IEC 62443 for risk-based resilience and supplier assurance.
HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
Key Features
- Risk-based safeguards for electronic PHI
- Minimum necessary standard limits PHI disclosures
- Presumption-of-breach with four-factor assessment
- Direct liability for business associates
- Individual rights to PHI access
IEC 62443
IEC 62443 Security for industrial automation and control systems
Key Features
- Risk-based zones and conduits segmentation model
- Security levels SL-T, SL-C, SL-A framework
- Shared responsibility across asset owners, suppliers, integrators
- Seven foundational requirements FR1-7 for systems/components
- Modular ISASecure certifications SDLA, CSA, SSA
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HIPAA Details
What It Is
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) is a US federal regulation codified at 45 CFR Parts 160, 162, 164. It establishes national standards protecting protected health information (PHI) for covered entities (providers, plans, clearinghouses) and business associates. Scope covers privacy, security, breach notification. Core approach: risk-based, flexible, scalable, technology-neutral governance framework balancing data flow with protections.
Key Components
- **Privacy Rulepermitted/authorized PHI uses, minimum necessary, TPO exceptions, patient rights.
- **Security Ruleadministrative, physical, technical safeguards for ePHI; risk analysis cornerstone.
- **Breach Notification Rule60-day notifications, presumption-of-breach model. Seven pillars: scope, patient rights, BA governance, enforcement. No fixed controls; tailored via documentation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance enforced by OCR with tiered penalties up to millions.
- Mitigates breach risks, builds cyber resilience, ensures vendor accountability.
- Enables secure TPO data exchange, market access, patient trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess (risk analysis, scoping), build (policies, training, BAAs, safeguards), assure (audits, monitoring). Applies to US healthcare entities of all sizes. No certification; requires 6-year documentation, OCR audits.
IEC 62443 Details
What It Is
IEC 62443 is the international consensus-based series of standards for securing Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). It provides a comprehensive, risk-based framework spanning governance, risk assessment, system architecture, and product development for OT environments.
Key Components
- Four groupings: General (-1), Policies/Procedures (-2), System (-3), Components (-4).
- Seven Foundational Requirements (FR1-7) like identification, integrity, data flow.
- Zones/conduits model and Security Levels (SL 0-4) with SL-T, SL-C, SL-A.
- ~140+ component requirements; maturity levels ML1-4; ISASecure certifications (SDLA, CSA, SSA).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates OT-specific risks (safety, availability, legacy systems).
- Enables shared responsibility among asset owners, integrators, suppliers.
- Supports regulatory alignment, insurance benefits, supply chain assurance.
- Builds stakeholder trust via certifiable conformance.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: CSMS governance (2-1), risk assessment/zoning (3-2), controls (3-3/4-2). Applies to critical infrastructure globally; requires audits, training for all sizes.
Key Differences
| Aspect | HIPAA | IEC 62443 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | PHI privacy, security, breach notification for healthcare | IACS/OT cybersecurity lifecycle, zones, security levels |
| Industry | US healthcare covered entities, business associates | Industrial automation, critical infrastructure globally |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal regulation with OCR enforcement | Voluntary international standards series with certifications |
| Testing | Risk analysis, audits, no formal certification required | ISASecure certification, SL assessments, maturity audits |
| Penalties | Civil penalties up to $2M annually, OCR settlements | No legal penalties, loss of certification/market access |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HIPAA and IEC 62443
HIPAA FAQ
IEC 62443 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PMBOK vs BRC
PMBOK vs BRC: Compare project governance standards with food safety frameworks. Unlock tailoring, compliance strategies & implementation insights for optimal success. Dive in now!
CMMC vs GLBA
CMMC vs GLBA: DoD cybersecurity tiers (NIST 800-171/172 Levels 1-3) vs financial privacy/safeguards rules. Frameworks, pitfalls, strategies for DIB & finance compliance edge.
HITRUST CSF vs ISO 22301
Compare HITRUST CSF vs ISO 22301: Certifiable security framework vs BCMS standard. Harmonize compliance, boost resilience. Discover key differences now!