HIPAA
US regulation for health information privacy and security
ISO 27701
International standard for privacy information management systems
Quick Verdict
HIPAA mandates PHI safeguards for US healthcare via enforceable rules, while ISO 27701 certifies global PIMS for PII governance. Organizations adopt HIPAA for legal compliance, ISO 27701 for auditable privacy maturity and market trust.
HIPAA
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
Key Features
- Mandates risk analysis for ePHI confidentiality, integrity, availability
- Enforces minimum necessary standard for PHI uses, disclosures
- Presumes breaches unless rebutted by four-factor risk assessment
- Imposes direct liability on business associates via BAAs
- Grants individuals rights to access, amend, account for PHI
ISO 27701
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management
Key Features
- Establishes Privacy Information Management System (PIMS)
- Controller-specific controls in Annex A
- Processor-specific controls in Annex B
- Risk-based PDCA methodology with DPIAs
- Mappings to GDPR and ISO 27001
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HIPAA Details
What It Is
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 establishes national standards via Administrative Simplification Regulations (45 CFR Parts 160, 162, 164). This US federal regulation governs privacy, security, and breach notification for protected health information (PHI). Primary purpose: balance health data flows for care with individual protections using a risk-based, flexible approach scalable to entity size.
Key Components
- **Privacy RuleControls PHI uses/disclosures, minimum necessary, patient rights.
- **Security RuleAdministrative, physical, technical safeguards for ePHI.
- **Breach Notification RuleTimely reporting of unsecured PHI breaches. Seven pillars include business associate governance, enforcement. No fixed controls; requires documented risk analysis. Compliance via HHS OCR investigations, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for covered entities (providers, plans, clearinghouses) and business associates. Mitigates penalties (up to $2M+ annually), reduces breach risks, builds patient trust. Enables secure data exchange, vendor partnerships, cyber resilience.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess risks, build safeguards, operate/monitor. Applies to US healthcare entities handling PHI. Involves training, BAAs, audits; ongoing, no expiration.
ISO 27701 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is the international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It provides requirements and guidance for managing personally identifiable information (PII) lifecycle, emphasizing accountability, risk management, and alignment with privacy laws like GDPR. It follows a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology, extendable from ISO/IEC 27001.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 for management system (context, leadership, planning, operation, evaluation, improvement)
- **Annex AControls for PII controllers (e.g., consent, data subject rights)
- **Annex BControls for PII processors (e.g., contracts, sub-processors)
- Mappings to GDPR, ISO 27001/27002; certification via accredited bodies
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates regulatory fines, breach risks; enables procurement differentiation
- Demonstrates compliance across jurisdictions; builds trust
- Reduces data footprint costs; strategic privacy governance
Implementation Overview
- Phased: discover/scope, design/plan, implement/operate, validate/improve
- PII inventory, DPIAs, training, audits; suits all sizes/industries
- Optional certification (standalone or with ISO 27001); 6-12 months typical (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | HIPAA | ISO 27701 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | PHI privacy, security, breach notification for ePHI | PIMS for PII lifecycle, privacy controls, risk management |
| Industry | US healthcare covered entities, business associates | All sectors handling PII globally |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal regulation with OCR enforcement | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Risk analysis, OCR audits, no formal certification | Internal audits, certification body Stage 1/2 audits |
| Penalties | Civil fines up to $2M+, criminal prosecution | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HIPAA and ISO 27701
HIPAA FAQ
ISO 27701 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance
Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco

Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers
Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)
Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs EN 1090
Compare NIST CSF vs EN 1090: cybersecurity's Govern-ID-Protect cycle meets steel execution classes (EXC1-4) for CE compliance. Key diffs, benefits—optimize now!
PRINCE2 vs AS9110C
Compare PRINCE2 vs AS9110C: project governance mastery meets aerospace QMS rigor. Uncover differences, synergies, and implementation strategies for compliant, high-value delivery. Explore now!
BRC vs ISO 56002
Compare BRC vs ISO 56002: Food safety certification meets innovation management. Key differences, structures, benefits & implementation for compliance, quality & growth. Dive in now!