Standards Comparison

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security and privacy standards

    VS

    23 NYCRR 500

    Mandatory
    2017

    NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance

    Quick Verdict

    HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable, multi-framework assurance for healthcare ecosystems, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates risk-based cybersecurity for NY financial firms. Organizations adopt HITRUST for trusted vendor assurance; Part 500 for regulatory compliance and enforcement avoidance.

    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ authoritative security standards into one framework
    • Risk-based tailoring using organizational and system factors
    • Maturity scoring across policy, process, implemented, measured, managed
    • Centralized certification via MyCSF platform and assessors
    • Control inheritance for shared responsibility models
    Financial Services

    23 NYCRR 500

    23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification to NYDFS
    • CEO/CISO dual-signature annual compliance certification
    • Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged and remote access
    • Risk-based third-party service provider oversight policy
    • Annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ standards like HIPAA, NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It provides a risk-tailored, prescriptive assurance program via the MyCSF platform.

    Key Components

    • 19 assessment domains covering governance, technical safeguards, and resilience.
    • Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications.
    • Five-level maturity model (policy, process, implemented, measured, managed).
    • Tiered assurances: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Rationalizes multi-regulatory compliance (assess once, report many).
    • Delivers credible third-party assurance reducing audit fatigue.
    • 99.41% breach-free rate among certified environments; 464% ROI reported.
    • Essential for healthcare ecosystems, vendor mandates, cyber insurance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment, continuous monitoring.
    • Targets healthcare, regulated sectors; scalable via inheritance (up to 85%).
    • Requires Authorized External Assessors, MyCSF, 90-day operational evidence.

    23 NYCRR 500 Details

    What It Is

    23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate for financial entities. It establishes minimum, risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems' confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The approach centers on documented risk assessments informing program design.

    Key Components

    • 14 core requirements including cybersecurity program (§500.2), CISO governance (§500.4), MFA (§500.12), encryption (§500.15), penetration testing (§500.5), and third-party oversight (§500.11).
    • Pillars: governance, risk assessment, technical controls, incident response, and annual certification.
    • Built on risk-based principles with phased amendments (2023 Second Amendment).
    • Compliance via CEO/CISO dual-signature annual certification by April 15, with 5-year record retention.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Covered entities comply to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M). It enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust, and aligns with NIST CSF for broader benefits.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased rollout (up to 24 months) via gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment (MFA, asset inventory), TPSP contracts, and evidence repository. Applies to NY-licensed financial firms (banks, insurers); Class A companies face enhanced audits. No third-party certification, but DFS examinations enforce.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    HITRUST CSF
    Comprehensive controls across 19 domains, harmonizing 60+ standards
    23 NYCRR 500
    Financial services cybersecurity program, risk assessments, MFA, vendor oversight

    Industry

    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare primary, industry-agnostic, global adoption
    23 NYCRR 500
    NY financial services entities (banks, insurers), NY-licensed

    Nature

    HITRUST CSF
    Voluntary certifiable framework with maturity scoring
    23 NYCRR 500
    Mandatory state regulation with fines and enforcement

    Testing

    HITRUST CSF
    Maturity-based assessments (e1/i1/r2), authorized assessors, MyCSF platform
    23 NYCRR 500
    Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans, risk assessments, CISO oversight

    Penalties

    HITRUST CSF
    Loss of certification, market/reputation impact
    23 NYCRR 500
    Multi-million fines, consent orders, license revocation

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about HITRUST CSF and 23 NYCRR 500

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    23 NYCRR 500 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages