Standards Comparison

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global certification framework for sustainable built environments.

    Quick Verdict

    HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable cybersecurity assurance for healthcare via risk-tailored controls, while BREEAM provides sustainability certification for buildings through category-weighted credits. Organizations adopt them for credible third-party validation, regulatory alignment, and market differentiation in regulated sectors.

    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ frameworks for assess-once-report-many
    • Risk-based tailoring via organizational/system/regulatory factors
    • Five-level maturity model with weighted scoring
    • Centralized certification via MyCSF and assessors
    • Inheritance for cloud/shared responsibility models
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Credit-based scoring across 10 weighted sustainability categories
    • Third-party certification by licensed Assessors and BRE audits
    • Lifecycle coverage from design to in-use operational performance
    • Knowledge Base Compliance Notes for ongoing updates
    • Alignment with EU Taxonomy and net-zero strategies

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based approach with structured tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors.

    Key Components

    • 19 assessment domains and hierarchical taxonomy (14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications).
    • Five-level maturity model: Policy (15%), Procedure (20%), Implemented (40%), Measured (10%), Managed (15%).
    • Tiered assurances: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year).
    • MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, and certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Rationalizes multi-regulatory compliance (assess once, report many).
    • Provides credible third-party assurance for healthcare, finance.
    • Reduces breach risk (99.4% breach-free certified environments).
    • Enables market differentiation, lower insurance premiums.

    Implementation Overview

    Multi-phase: scoping/gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment by authorized assessors, continuous monitoring. Suited for regulated industries; requires policies, evidence automation, inheritance for cloud. Certification valid 1-2 years.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. It assesses environmental, social, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology that yields ratings from Pass to Outstanding.

    Key Components

    • **10 core categoriesManagement, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
    • Credits earned via scheme-specific technical manuals and Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs).
    • Third-party assurance by licensed Assessors and BRE Global audits (ISO/IEC 17065 accredited).
    • Ratings: Pass (≥30%), Excellent (≥70%), Outstanding (≥85%).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives operational savings (e.g., 22-33% energy reduction), asset value uplift (up to 30%), and ESG alignment.
    • Supports regulatory compliance (e.g., EU Taxonomy), risk mitigation, and market differentiation.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through verified performance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, certification.
    • Requires early Assessor/AP appointment, evidence management, training.
    • Applicable globally to all sizes/types; voluntary but often planning-driven.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    HITRUST CSF
    Information security, privacy controls across 19 domains
    BREEAM
    Building sustainability, health, energy across 10+ categories

    Industry

    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare, regulated sectors globally
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate worldwide

    Nature

    HITRUST CSF
    Voluntary certifiable control framework
    BREEAM
    Voluntary sustainability certification system

    Testing

    HITRUST CSF
    Maturity-scored validated assessments by assessors
    BREEAM
    Credit-based audits by licensed assessors

    Penalties

    HITRUST CSF
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties
    BREEAM
    No legal penalties, loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about HITRUST CSF and BREEAM

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages