HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
CIS Controls
Prioritized cybersecurity framework for cyber resilience
Quick Verdict
HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable, risk-tailored assurance harmonizing 60+ standards for healthcare and regulated industries, while CIS Controls provide prioritized cyber hygiene safeguards for all organizations. Companies adopt HITRUST for trusted third-party validation; CIS for practical, scalable defense.
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into certifiable controls
- Risk-based tailoring via structured factors
- Five-level maturity model for controls
- Centralized MyCSF platform and validation
- Assess once, report many mappings
CIS Controls
CIS Controls v8.1
Key Features
- 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
- Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
- Mappings to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, HIPAA frameworks
- Free CIS Benchmarks for secure configurations
- Asset inventory and continuous vulnerability management focus
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing over 60 standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS. It employs a risk-based approach with structured tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors.
Key Components
- 19 assessment domains and hierarchical taxonomy (14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications).
- Five-level maturity model: Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed.
- Tiered assessments: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored).
- MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, and certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Unified compliance for "assess once, report many."
- Credible third-party assurance reduces audits and sales friction.
- Risk management via maturity scoring and inheritance.
- Market differentiation, especially in healthcare and finance.
Implementation Overview
Multi-phase: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment by assessors, certification. Suited for regulated industries; requires policies, evidence automation, ongoing monitoring. ~12-18 months typical for r2.
CIS Controls Details
What It Is
CIS Controls v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce attack surfaces and enhance resilience. It applies to all industries and organization sizes via Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3), focusing on actionable Safeguards derived from real-world threats.
Key Components
- 18 Controls across asset management, data protection, vulnerability handling, monitoring, and incident response.
- 153 Safeguards grouped into IG1 (56 essentials), IG2, IG3 for maturity scaling.
- Built on offense-informed prioritization; no formal certification, self-assessed compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates 85% of common attacks, accelerates regulatory mappings (NIST, HIPAA).
- Delivers ROI via efficiency, insurance discounts, vendor trust.
- Builds resilience against breaches, supply-chain risks.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: governance, discovery, foundational controls (IG1), expansion (IG2/3).
- Involves inventories, automation, training; suits SMBs to enterprises, all sectors.
- Metrics-driven, ongoing validation via tools like CIS Benchmarks.
Key Differences
| Aspect | HITRUST CSF | CIS Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | 19 domains, harmonized 60+ frameworks, maturity-scored controls | 18 prioritized controls, 153 safeguards, cyber hygiene focus |
| Industry | Healthcare primary, industry-agnostic, regulated sectors | All industries, sector-agnostic, all organization sizes |
| Nature | Certifiable framework with centralized assurance program | Voluntary best-practice controls, no certification |
| Testing | Validated assessments by authorized assessors, maturity scoring | Self-assessment, no formal testing or certification required |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No penalties, voluntary implementation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HITRUST CSF and CIS Controls
HITRUST CSF FAQ
CIS Controls FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance
Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc
The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GMP vs REACH
Discover GMP vs REACH: Compare pharma quality standards with EU chemical safety rules. Unlock compliance strategies, key differences & risks to protect operations. Master both today!
ISO 30301 vs Basel III
ISO 30301 vs Basel III: Compare records management systems (MSR governance) with banking capital/liquidity rules. Uncover compliance diffs, risks & strategies—boost resilience now!
ISO 37301 vs APRA CPS 234
ISO 37301 vs APRA CPS 234: Certifiable CMS meets Aussie financial info sec prudence. Compare governance, risks, controls, whistleblowing & testing. Align for resilient compliance now!